《民法总则》第123条的功能考察——兼论知识产权法典化的未来发展
发布时间：2018-11-09 18:07
【摘要】：《民法总则》第123条是我国民法典中唯一一条对知识产权进行集中性规定的条文。该条在功能上存在着诸多不足,其价值宣示功能被弱化,统领法律体系功能存在缺位,促进法学研究的功能尚有限,未必能有效地实现立法者所期望达成的目的。在民法典编纂的轨迹之外,知识产权领域本身也在走一条逐步体系化并最终迈向法典化的道路,许多国家先后制定了单独的知识产权法典。立法者应从促进知识产权法律的体系化、宣示知识产权国家战略和刺激知识产权研究等方面出发,适时启动我国知识产权法典的编纂工作。
[Abstract]:Article 123 of the Civil Code is the only article in the Civil Code that provides centralized provisions on intellectual property rights. There are many deficiencies in the function of this article, the function of value declaration is weakened, the function of commanding legal system is absent, and the function of promoting legal research is still limited, which may not be able to achieve the purpose that legislators expect to achieve effectively. In addition to the track of the compilation of civil code, the field of intellectual property itself is also following a path of gradual systematization and finally towards codification. Many countries have formulated separate intellectual property codes one after another. In order to promote the systematization of intellectual property law, proclaim the national strategy of intellectual property and stimulate the research of intellectual property, the legislator should start the codification of intellectual property code in good time.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心;
【基金】：国家知识产权局软科学研究项目“我国民法典中知识产权部分主要内容研究”(项目编号:SS16-A-01)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2321171
[Abstract]:Article 123 of the Civil Code is the only article in the Civil Code that provides centralized provisions on intellectual property rights. There are many deficiencies in the function of this article, the function of value declaration is weakened, the function of commanding legal system is absent, and the function of promoting legal research is still limited, which may not be able to achieve the purpose that legislators expect to achieve effectively. In addition to the track of the compilation of civil code, the field of intellectual property itself is also following a path of gradual systematization and finally towards codification. Many countries have formulated separate intellectual property codes one after another. In order to promote the systematization of intellectual property law, proclaim the national strategy of intellectual property and stimulate the research of intellectual property, the legislator should start the codification of intellectual property code in good time.
【作者单位】： 中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心;
【基金】：国家知识产权局软科学研究项目“我国民法典中知识产权部分主要内容研究”(项目编号:SS16-A-01)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 胡承伟;;关键设施理论与知识产权拒绝许可的反垄断规制[J];滨州学院学报;2014年02期
2 ;时讯点击[J];法律与生活;2014年11期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 吴栓荻;新常态下我国知识产权边境措施完善问题研究[D];广西大学;2017年
，本文编号：2321171
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2321171.html
