我国不动产登记机构登记错误赔偿责任制度之完善

发布时间：2018-11-10 07:55

【摘要】：不动产登记机构登记错误的赔偿责任对保障私权、督促依法行政、维护制度的高效公正运行起着关键作用。目前该责任制度在我国法律规定中和司法实践中存在一些问题,相关学术研究争论不止。因此,我国不动产登记机构登记错误赔偿责任制度应当予以修正。本文由引言、正文、结语等部分组成。正文分为四章。第一章主要为不动产登记错误界定问题。学术上共有广义说、狭义说、折衷说等学说。由于我国采取的是债权形式主义的物权变动方式,折衷说更契合我国实际。除此之外,登记错误的范围还包括机构纯粹的违反登记程序的举动,如延迟登记、不履行告知义务等举动。第二章分析了我国登记机构赔偿责任的性质、归责原则、具体形态以及审查标准在法律规定中、司法实践中具有的问题及在学术中具备的争议。第三章对问题及争议原因进行分析。从理论、制度、思维三个层面分析了存在的问题及争议的成因。成因主要为：在公私法划分理论研究范式下,公私法联动视角缺乏；关于国家赔偿责任之法律规定之间存在重复和冲突；法学研究思维和法律实践思维存在差别等。第四章为我国登记机构赔偿责任制度之完善部分。我国不动产登记错误赔偿责任制度应从以下方面予以完善：第一,明确登记错误赔偿责任的性质为行政赔偿责任；第二,在行政赔偿责任归责原则为违法责任的前提下,明确“法”之范围,即包含原则；第三,理顺登记错误赔偿责任的具体形态。一般情况下,登记机构的责任为单独责任；恶意串通情形下机构的责任为特殊的连带责任；无意思联络侵权的情况下,登记机构的责任为不真正连带责任。第四,完善登记审查标准,以效益大于成本原则、审查能力原则、尊重登记申请人意思自治原则确定和完善审查标准,包括书面审查登记原因行为,审查身份证明及权属证书之真实性、有效性,查明有关证明材料与申请登记等内容是否书面基本相同。
[Abstract]:The liability of compensation for registration errors of real estate registration institutions plays a key role in protecting private rights, supervising administration according to law, and maintaining the efficient and fair operation of the system. At present, there are some problems in our country's legal regulation and judicial practice. Therefore, the system of liability for false registration of real estate registration institutions in China should be amended. This article is composed of preface, text, conclusion and so on. The text is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is mainly about the problem of wrong definition of real estate registration. Academically there are broad sense, narrow sense, compromise theory and so on. Because our country adopts the property right change mode of creditor's right formalism, the compromise theory is more in accord with the reality of our country. In addition, the scope of registration errors also includes the agency's pure violation of registration procedures, such as late registration, failure to comply with the obligation to inform, and so on. The second chapter analyzes the nature of the liability of the registration agencies in China, the principle of liability, the specific form and the standard of examination in the legal provisions, judicial practice problems and academic disputes. The third chapter analyzes the problems and the causes of the dispute. This paper analyzes the existing problems and the causes of disputes from three aspects: theory, institution and thinking. The main causes are as follows: under the research paradigm of the theory of the division of public and private law, the angle of view of the linkage between public and private law is lacking; there are duplicates and conflicts between the legal provisions of the state's liability for compensation, and there are differences between the thinking of legal research and the thinking of legal practice, etc. The fourth chapter is the perfect part of the liability system of the registration institution in our country. The system of compensation for false registration of immovable property in our country should be improved from the following aspects: first, it is clear that the nature of the liability for compensation of registration errors is administrative liability for compensation; Secondly, under the premise that the principle of imputation of administrative compensation liability is illegal, the scope of "Law" is defined, that is, the principle of inclusion; third, the concrete form of liability for registration errors is straightened out. In general, the responsibility of the registration institution is a separate liability; in the case of malicious collusion, the liability of the institution is a special joint liability; in the case of no intention contact infringement, the liability of the registration institution is not genuine joint and several liability. Fourth, perfect the standard of registration examination, determine and perfect the standard of examination with the principle of benefit greater than cost, principle of examination ability and respect for the principle of autonomy of the applicant for registration, including the behavior of examining the reasons for registration in writing. Examine the authenticity and validity of the identity certificate and the title certificate, and find out whether the relevant documents are basically the same as the application for registration.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】