我国民事法律中的“修理、重作、更换”
发布时间：2018-12-12 07:01
【摘要】：我国现行民事法律中将"修理、重作、更换"定性为一种民事责任的承担方式,存在谬误。"修理、重作、更换"不是一个法律概念,其不具备法律概念应有的特性,也无法发挥法律概念的功能;"修理、重作、更换"不是一种独立的请求权,它已被其他请求权所涵盖。"修理、重作、更换"不具有民事责任的强制性。根据民法典总则"提取公因式"原理,民法典应废弃现行民事立法将"修理、重作、更换"作为一种民事责任承担方式的做法。
[Abstract]:In the current civil law of our country, "repair, rework and replacement" is characterized as a way of assuming civil liability, and there is a fallacy. "repair, rework, replacement" is not a legal concept, it does not have the characteristics of the legal concept, nor can it play the function of the legal concept; "repair, rework, replacement" is not a separate claim, it is covered by other claims. Repair, rework, replacement "Non-civil liability is mandatory." According to the principle of "extracting the common cause" of the general rule of the Civil Code, the Civil Code should abandon the existing civil legislation and take the practice of "repairing, redoing and replacing" as a way of assuming civil liability.
【作者单位】： 全国哲学社会科学规划办公室基金管理处;
【分类号】：D923
，
本文编号：2374146
[Abstract]:In the current civil law of our country, "repair, rework and replacement" is characterized as a way of assuming civil liability, and there is a fallacy. "repair, rework, replacement" is not a legal concept, it does not have the characteristics of the legal concept, nor can it play the function of the legal concept; "repair, rework, replacement" is not a separate claim, it is covered by other claims. Repair, rework, replacement "Non-civil liability is mandatory." According to the principle of "extracting the common cause" of the general rule of the Civil Code, the Civil Code should abandon the existing civil legislation and take the practice of "repairing, redoing and replacing" as a way of assuming civil liability.
【作者单位】： 全国哲学社会科学规划办公室基金管理处;
【分类号】：D923
，
本文编号：2374146
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2374146.html
