我国医疗责任鉴定机构的法律问题研究
发布时间:2018-12-18 09:19
【摘要】:当前,在双轨制的医疗责任鉴定机构的形势下,各医疗责任鉴定机构都在为化解医疗纠纷而服务。然而,两种鉴定机构由于在设立、职责、治理结构等方面的界限存在模糊,导致鉴定意见出现矛盾问题,困扰着纠纷的解决和鉴定意见的权威和效力。对于这些存在的问题,从分析当前双轨制的鉴定机构及其存在的问题、域外鉴定制度的发展状况着手,提出了要完善医疗责任鉴定机构的设想,即建立一元化的统一医疗责任鉴定机构。为科学规范、统一管理,在设立鉴定机构方面,建立一个医疗责任鉴定机构,变双轨为单轨,这就要求配备合格的鉴定人员;在规范鉴定机构的程序上,应规范鉴定的启动程序,公开鉴定过程;在鉴定机构职责的完善上,实行鉴定专家跨区域,避免“同行鉴定”之嫌,统一以抽签的方式选派鉴定人参与鉴定,同时规范鉴定的启动程序;在鉴定机构的内部治理结构上,加强对鉴定人和鉴定意见的事后审查,加强独立管理,摆脱行政干预,机构内部治理推行个人负责制。从而建立一个科学、合理的医疗责任鉴定机构,这也就可以解决当前存在很多矛盾纠纷。
[Abstract]:At present, under the dual-track medical responsibility appraisal institution, each medical responsibility appraisal organization is serving to resolve the medical dispute. However, due to the blur in the establishment, responsibility, governance structure and other aspects of the two appraisal institutions, there are contradictions in the appraisal opinions, which puzzles the resolution of disputes and the authority and effectiveness of the appraisal opinions. With regard to these problems, starting from the analysis of the current two-track appraisal institutions and their existing problems, and the development of the extraterritorial appraisal system, this paper puts forward a tentative plan to perfect the medical responsibility appraisal institutions. That is, the establishment of a unified identification of medical responsibility. For the sake of scientific standardization and unified management, a medical responsibility appraisal institution should be set up in the aspect of setting up appraisal institution, which should be equipped with qualified appraisal personnel. In the procedure of standardizing the appraisal institution, the starting procedure of the appraisal should be standardized, and the appraisal process should be made public; On the perfection of the duty of the appraisal organization, the experts should be carried out across regions to avoid the suspicion of "peer appraisal", and experts should be selected by drawing lots to participate in the appraisal, and the starting procedure of the appraisal should be standardized at the same time; In the internal governance structure of the appraisal organization, we should strengthen the ex post examination of the appraiser and the appraisal opinion, strengthen the independent management, get rid of the administrative intervention, and carry out the personal responsibility system in the internal management of the organization. Thus, a scientific and reasonable medical responsibility appraisal institution can be established, which can solve many contradictions and disputes.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.16;D923
本文编号:2385639
[Abstract]:At present, under the dual-track medical responsibility appraisal institution, each medical responsibility appraisal organization is serving to resolve the medical dispute. However, due to the blur in the establishment, responsibility, governance structure and other aspects of the two appraisal institutions, there are contradictions in the appraisal opinions, which puzzles the resolution of disputes and the authority and effectiveness of the appraisal opinions. With regard to these problems, starting from the analysis of the current two-track appraisal institutions and their existing problems, and the development of the extraterritorial appraisal system, this paper puts forward a tentative plan to perfect the medical responsibility appraisal institutions. That is, the establishment of a unified identification of medical responsibility. For the sake of scientific standardization and unified management, a medical responsibility appraisal institution should be set up in the aspect of setting up appraisal institution, which should be equipped with qualified appraisal personnel. In the procedure of standardizing the appraisal institution, the starting procedure of the appraisal should be standardized, and the appraisal process should be made public; On the perfection of the duty of the appraisal organization, the experts should be carried out across regions to avoid the suspicion of "peer appraisal", and experts should be selected by drawing lots to participate in the appraisal, and the starting procedure of the appraisal should be standardized at the same time; In the internal governance structure of the appraisal organization, we should strengthen the ex post examination of the appraiser and the appraisal opinion, strengthen the independent management, get rid of the administrative intervention, and carry out the personal responsibility system in the internal management of the organization. Thus, a scientific and reasonable medical responsibility appraisal institution can be established, which can solve many contradictions and disputes.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.16;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 霍宪丹;;中国司法鉴定管理体制改革的实践与展望[J];中国司法;2011年01期
2 夏芸;;医学鉴定与法的评价——以日本的判例为视点[J];法律与医学杂志;2007年01期
3 沈健,韩波;论医疗事故鉴定结论在民事诉讼中的应用[J];法学评论;2004年02期
4 施卫忠;许江;;司法鉴定制度改革刍论[J];南京大学法律评论;2001年01期
5 刘志军;;论医疗损害责任鉴定制度的改革[J];河北工程大学学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
6 张晨;医疗事故争议两种鉴定活动的差异初探[J];中国司法鉴定;2004年S1期
7 陈洪明,刘永强;浅论医疗事故的司法鉴定[J];中国司法鉴定;2004年S1期
8 李菊萍;;论医疗事故技术鉴定制度的缺憾及完善[J];中国司法鉴定;2006年04期
9 农会清;钟凯;梁增文;;论我国现行双轨制下医疗鉴定制度的改革[J];社会科学家;2013年04期
10 杨荣强;叶强;李明发;贾波;上官鑫鑫;;医疗事故技术鉴定中存在的问题及探讨[J];中国卫生资源;2010年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 周瑶华;[N];人民法院报;2003年
,本文编号:2385639
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2385639.html