环境侵权溢出性研究—兼评《侵权责任法》第65条
发布时间：2018-12-19 12:16
【摘要】：科学日新月异的发展带来企业生产活动的技术性、专业性不断提高,从而引发的环境问题不可避免成为制约社会发展的重要环节。随着环境问题不断引发,传统以“排放”为主的环境污染侵权形式已无法涵盖环境侵权的所有内容,进入立法者和普通大众视线的是损害更为严重的生态破坏,且生态破坏因其自身特殊性,《侵权责任法》无力应对。2016年4月14日,第424期民商法前沿论坛在中国人民大学隆重举行。会议针对当前环境侵权溢出性问题进行广泛讨论,相关环境法学者做了发言,表达了对问题进行整治的急迫心情。现行《侵权责任法》将环境问题作为单独章节加以调整,并以“环境污染责任为题”,第65条也做出了“因污染环境造成损害的,污染者应当承担侵权责任”的相应规定。在环境侵权问题上,一些立法理念其标准并非实质意义上的价值衡量,而是一种“经济发展优先”的思想。公法与私法的冲突,人身权利、财产权利以及精神权利的私益性与环境侵权的公益性之间的矛盾,正随着环境问题的发展不断涌现,引发学者广泛关注。本文以《侵权责任法》第65条为视角,对侵权法所存在的问题,环境侵权面临的困境进行分析,运用各种研究方法,在对国内外相关立法进行学习的基础上,提出自己的一些见解。并对环境侵权的溢出性问题做积极可行性设想,以此突破传统民法框架,寻求环境侵权问题更理想的走向。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of science has brought about the technical and professional development of enterprises' production activities, which inevitably leads to environmental problems that restrict the development of society. With the environmental problems being caused constantly, the traditional environmental pollution tort form based on "discharge" has been unable to cover all the contents of the environmental tort, and it is the more serious ecological damage that has come to the attention of the legislators and the general public. Because of its own particularity, the Tort liability Law is unable to deal with ecological damage. On April 14, 2016, the 424 Forum on the Frontier of Civil and Commercial Law was held in Renmin University of China. At the meeting, the spillover problem of environmental tort was extensively discussed, and the relevant environmental law scholars made a speech, expressing the urgency of solving the problem. The current Tort liability Law adjusts environmental issues as a separate chapter, and takes environmental pollution liability as its title. Article 65 also provides that "polluters shall bear tort liability if damage is caused by pollution to the environment". On the issue of environmental tort, the standard of some legislative ideas is not the value measure in essence, but a thought of "economic development first". The conflict between public law and private law, the contradiction between personal rights, property rights and spiritual rights, and the public welfare of environmental tort, is emerging with the development of environmental problems, which has aroused widespread concern of scholars. From the perspective of Article 65 of the Tort liability Law, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the Tort Law and the plight of the Environmental Tort, and applies various research methods to study the relevant legislation at home and abroad. Put forward some of your own ideas. And make the positive feasibility assumption to the spillover problem of the environmental tort, so as to break through the traditional civil law frame, and seek the more ideal trend of the environmental tort problem.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2386906
[Abstract]:The rapid development of science has brought about the technical and professional development of enterprises' production activities, which inevitably leads to environmental problems that restrict the development of society. With the environmental problems being caused constantly, the traditional environmental pollution tort form based on "discharge" has been unable to cover all the contents of the environmental tort, and it is the more serious ecological damage that has come to the attention of the legislators and the general public. Because of its own particularity, the Tort liability Law is unable to deal with ecological damage. On April 14, 2016, the 424 Forum on the Frontier of Civil and Commercial Law was held in Renmin University of China. At the meeting, the spillover problem of environmental tort was extensively discussed, and the relevant environmental law scholars made a speech, expressing the urgency of solving the problem. The current Tort liability Law adjusts environmental issues as a separate chapter, and takes environmental pollution liability as its title. Article 65 also provides that "polluters shall bear tort liability if damage is caused by pollution to the environment". On the issue of environmental tort, the standard of some legislative ideas is not the value measure in essence, but a thought of "economic development first". The conflict between public law and private law, the contradiction between personal rights, property rights and spiritual rights, and the public welfare of environmental tort, is emerging with the development of environmental problems, which has aroused widespread concern of scholars. From the perspective of Article 65 of the Tort liability Law, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the Tort Law and the plight of the Environmental Tort, and applies various research methods to study the relevant legislation at home and abroad. Put forward some of your own ideas. And make the positive feasibility assumption to the spillover problem of the environmental tort, so as to break through the traditional civil law frame, and seek the more ideal trend of the environmental tort problem.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 竺效;;论环境侵权原因行为的立法拓展[J];中国法学;2015年02期
2 王利民;李昱;;环境侵权责任的构成:解读新《环境保护法》第64条[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年06期
3 吕忠梅;;论生态文明建设的综合决策法律机制[J];中国法学;2014年03期
4 竺效;;论中国环境法基本原则的立法发展与再发展[J];华东政法大学学报;2014年03期
5 吕忠梅;;生态文明建设的法治思考[J];法学杂志;2014年05期
6 张新宝;庄超;;扩张与强化:环境侵权责任的综合适用[J];中国社会科学;2014年03期
7 曾祥生;方昀;;环境侵权行为的特征及其类型化研究[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年01期
8 薛丹;;基于环境责任保险的动态环境侵权救济体系研究[J];中国人口.资源与环境;2012年07期
9 王晓辉;;日本公害补偿制度评析与借鉴[J];环境保护;2011年16期
10 戴茂华;;论进一步完善我国环境侵权民事责任立法的必要性——兼评《侵权责任法》中环境污染责任条款[J];河北法学;2011年01期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 吕忠梅;;论环境侵权的二元性[N];人民法院报;2014年
，本文编号：2386906
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2386906.html
