用人单位虚假雇佣残疾人的法律关系性质辨析——裁判视野下的观察

发布时间：2019-01-02 13:18

【摘要】：用人单位常采用与残疾人签订虚假劳动合同的形式以实现享受雇佣残疾人的优惠政策且不承担实际用工的风险。本文以公开检索到的113份因用人单位虚假雇佣残疾人引发争议的裁判文书为样本,从规范梳理、实证考察、学理检讨三个层面探析当事人之间法律关系的性质与效力。探求当事人之间的真实意思系法律关系定性的核心与逻辑起点。如有证据表明当事人构成通谋虚伪意思表示,则劳动合同无效,法院应主客观相结合解释和确认被隐藏着的真实的意思表示。如果否认用人单位与残疾人之间具有劳动关系,他们之间有关"残疾证换酬劳"之类的协议是否发生私法上的效果,应当依据有关合同效力规则进行判定,可认定为有效;而其公法上的效果,则应当依据有关公法规则的立法目的以及相应规则进行判定。
[Abstract]:Employers often sign false labor contracts with the disabled in order to enjoy the preferential policies of employing disabled people and do not bear the risk of actual employment. This paper takes 113 documents publicly retrieved as a sample to analyze the nature and effectiveness of the legal relationship between the parties from three levels: normative combing, empirical investigation and theoretical review. Exploring the real meaning between the parties is the core and logical starting point of the qualitative nature of the legal relationship. If there is evidence that the parties constitute conspiracy hypocrisy, then the labor contract is invalid, the court should combine the subjective and objective interpretation and confirm the hidden true expression of will. If it is denied that there is a labor relationship between the employer and the disabled, whether or not the agreement between them has the effect of private law, it should be judged according to the rules of validity of the relevant contract, which can be recognized as valid; The effect of public law should be judged according to the legislative purpose of the relevant public law rules and the corresponding rules.
【作者单位】：复旦大学法学院;
【基金】：中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题(CLS(2016)D65)
【分类号】：D922.182.3

【相似文献】