论我国预告登记制度之完善

发布时间：2019-01-07 19:50

【摘要】：预告登记是不动产登记类型的一种特殊形式,它保全以不动产物权变动为目的债权请求权的实现,保障了“先债权”向“后物权变动”的过渡,从而使得登记权利人的利益得到了有力保护。与此同时,对于市场交易安全的保护、市场秩序的维护,预告登记制度有着重大且深远的意义。文章通过预告登记实证案例提出问题,分析了预告登记制度的性质、立法模式等,进一步提出完善该制度的效力、适用范围、程序等方面的举措,使之充分发挥其作用。第一章为我国预告登记制度的实务分歧及其现存不足。主要借司法实践中的典型案例作为引子,提出了预告登记的性质、效力、程序等方面在司法实务中出现的焦点问题以及我国立法体系下预告登记的现存不足。第二章为我国预告登记的性质与立法模式之管见。提出了预告登记制度的性质实为债权,为解决实务分歧提供了统一的标准；论证了我国预告登记目前坚守“绝对无效”立法模式的合理性、正当性；且基于此种立法模式的现实性,论证了我国预告登记制度不应该赋予其顺位的保全效力。第三章为我国预告登记的制度完善。文章提出了其效力应该给予补充、适用领域扩大、程序完善等意见,从而充分发挥预告登记制度的功能,使得法律实务难题明晰化。
[Abstract]:Notice registration is a special form of real estate registration type, which preserves the realization of claim right for the purpose of real property right change, and ensures the transition from "first creditor's rights" to "property right change". As a result, the interests of the registered right holders have been protected. At the same time, for the protection of market transaction security, the maintenance of market order, notice registration system has great and far-reaching significance. In this paper, the author analyses the nature and legislative model of the notice registration system, and puts forward some measures to perfect the system, such as effectiveness, scope of application, procedure and so on, in order to give full play to its function. The first chapter is the practical differences and the existing deficiencies of the advance notice registration system in China. Based on the typical cases in judicial practice, this paper puts forward the problems of the nature, effectiveness and procedure of notice registration in judicial practice, as well as the existing deficiencies of notice registration under the legislative system of our country. The second chapter is about the nature and legislative model of advance notice registration in China. This paper puts forward that the nature of the notice registration system is the creditor's right, which provides a unified standard for resolving the practical differences, and demonstrates the rationality and legitimacy of the "absolutely invalid" legislative model of the advance notice registration in our country at present. Based on the reality of this legislative model, this paper demonstrates that China's notice registration system should not give it the preservation effect of ranking. The third chapter is the improvement of the system of advance notice registration in our country. This paper puts forward that its effect should be supplemented, the application field expanded, the procedure consummated, and so on, so as to give full play to the function of the notice registration system and make the legal practice difficult problem clear.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】