空间役权制度研究

发布时间：2019-03-02 10:30

【摘要】：随着经济的进一步发展,资源也日显匮乏。为充分发挥土地资源的效用,土地已逐渐开始迈上分层和立体利用的道路。土地的上方是空间,土地的分层利用意味着空间开始进入广泛的社会生产和生活当中。由此,与空间权属相关的各种制度也随之产生,我国《物权法》已使用了“建设用地使用权”这一概念。但空间所涉及的诸多权利及其纠纷并非单一的“空间权”所能涵盖,如同与土地相关的权利并不能仅依“地上权”即可厘清一样。本文所要研究的空间役权,虽然属于空间权的下位概念,但其本身具有独特的价值,理应具有独立的法律地位。但就目前来看,学界对空间役权的研究甚少,其制度构建也需要进一步探讨。全文共分四个部分。第一部分是空间役权之界定。首先,文章分析了空间役权的含义,针对传统的“役权”概念进行重新审视,初步阐明传统的人役权与地役权的不足之处,并引入空间役权这一概念；其次,文章探讨了空间役权的价值属性,空间役权在理论上丰富了物权体系,在实践上也满足了社会之需；最后,文章对与空间役权相关的概念进行了具体辨析。第二部分是空间权之比较法考察。基于空间役权与空间权的衔接关系,文章首先讲述了空间权的产生渊源；其次,文章介绍了国外理论界对于空间权的含义之争；再次,文章介绍了两大法系关于空间役权的不同立法模式；最后,文章根据对前述空间权的渊源、含义以及立法模式的分析,得出考察结论。第三部分是空间役权制度之适用。文章主要研究了空间役权在我国的适用空间,重点分析了空间役权在我国用益物权体系上的物权独立性,以及空间役权与我国现有的一物一权主义是否矛盾两个问题。第四部分是空间役权之制度构建。文章从权利的构成、变动以及限制三个方面对空间役权制度进行系统分析,提出制度构建思路和立法建议,为使该制度最终融入我国的用益物权体系做好一定的准备工作。
[Abstract]:With the further development of the economy, resources are becoming increasingly scarce. In order to give full play to the utility of land resources, land has gradually begun to take the road of stratification and three-dimensional use. Above the land is the space, and the layered use of the land means that the space begins to enter into a wide range of social production and life. As a result, various systems related to the ownership of space have emerged, and the concept of "the right to use construction land" has been used in the property Law of China. However, many of the rights involved in space and its disputes are not covered by a single "space right", just as land-related rights cannot be clarified only by "land rights". The spatial servitude in this paper belongs to the subordination concept of the spatial right, but it has its own unique value and should have an independent legal status. But at present, there is little research on spatial servitude in academic circles, and its system construction also needs to be further discussed. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part is the definition of spatial servitude. Firstly, the paper analyzes the meaning of spatial servitude, re-examines the traditional concept of "easement", expounds the shortcomings of traditional human servitude and easement, and introduces the concept of spatial servitude. Secondly, the paper discusses the value attribute of spatial servitude, which enriches the real right system in theory and meets the needs of society in practice. Finally, the paper analyzes the concepts related to spatial servitude. The second part is a comparative study of space rights. Based on the connection between space servitude and space right, this paper first describes the origin of space right, secondly, it introduces the dispute about the meaning of space right in foreign theoretical circles. Thirdly, the paper introduces the different legislative models of space servitude in the two legal systems. Finally, based on the analysis of the origin, meaning and legislative mode of the above-mentioned space right, the paper draws a conclusion. The third part is the application of spatial servitude system. This paper mainly studies the applicable space of spatial servitude in our country, and emphatically analyzes the independence of spatial servitude in the system of usufruct right in our country, and the contradiction between spatial servitude and existing one-property-one-principle in our country. The fourth part is the system construction of spatial servitude. This paper makes a systematic analysis of the spatial servitude system from three aspects: the constitution, the change and the restriction of the right, and puts forward the thought of the system construction and the legislative suggestion, in order to make sure the system is finally integrated into the usufruct system of our country.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.2

【共引文献】