论我国民法典的立法路径选择
[Abstract]:There are three great debates about the formulation of civil code in history, which give beneficial enlightenment to the formulation of civil code in later generations. The formulation of civil code in our country has also experienced a relatively complex process. The fourth Plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China (CPC) put forward the formulation of the Civil Code, which made clear the goal of formulating the Civil Code in our country. However, there are still some controversies in the system structure and legislative model of the Civil Code. Although the goal is clear, it is necessary to examine whether the current civil code of our country is ripe or not and whether the legislative conditions are available. According to the experience of our country's current civil legislation and the preparation of the theory of civil law, the current civil code of our country should adopt the gradual legislative path. The first step is to introduce the general principles of the civil law first, and this work is already being done. The General provisions of the Civil Code (draft) have been widely consulted; The second step is to compile the civil code, which, of course, depends on reaching a consensus on the structure of the civil code, otherwise the progress of this work will be very slow; The third step is to codify the civil code, which is a systematic compilation and arrangement work on the basis of the various parts of the civil law, but the work is not very difficult, and the key is the work of the second step. The complexity of the adjustment object, the lack of preparation for academic theory, the arduous nature of legislative tasks, and the complexity of legislative technology determine that it is also a more tortuous process for its introduction. At present, it needs to be reached in the following areas, such as the consensus of scholars. The starting of the compilation of the civil code, the reserve of the theoretical knowledge and the formation of the basic legal literacy of the public do some necessary preparatory work, so as to create a more favorable opportunity for the smooth introduction of the civil code of our country.
【作者单位】: 山东大学威海分校;
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 封丽霞;世界民法典编纂史上的三次论战——“法典化”与“非法典化”思想之根源与比较[J];法制与社会发展;2002年04期
2 梁慧星;制定民法典的设想[J];现代法学;2001年02期
3 王利明;论中国民法典的制订[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;1999年01期
4 王利明;论中国民法典的制订[J];政法论坛;1998年05期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王太平;;中国民法典的“知识化”:理由和具体方案[J];知识产权;2017年11期
2 王晓翔;;论我国商誉权法律保护制度的构建[J];金陵法律评论;2016年01期
3 汪全胜;;论我国民法典的立法路径选择[J];外国法制史研究;2016年00期
4 刘志刚;;一般人格权形成路径的宪法学分析[J];复旦学报(社会科学版);2017年05期
5 厉尽国;;中国《民法典》编纂中的习惯法问题[J];交大法学;2017年03期
6 蓝蓝;;《民法总则》法源规定之评析——以法典的开放性为切入点[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2017年05期
7 杨正宇;;由“知识产权收益”窥探“知识产权入典”[J];贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版);2017年03期
8 陈寒非;;民法典编纂中的民事习惯:从事实到规范的转化[J];民间法;2017年01期
9 赵磊;;民法典编纂中的立法模式悖论——基于商法规范如何安排的视角[J];北方法学;2017年03期
10 陈建华;;民法典编纂背景下民法与宪法的关系——基于司法实践视角[J];法治论坛;2017年01期
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 江平;制订民法典的几点宏观思考[J];政法论坛;1997年03期
2 魏振瀛;中国的民事立法与民法法典化[J];中外法学;1995年03期
,本文编号:2437953
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2437953.html