我国《民法总则》的制度创新及历史意义
发布时间：2019-03-24 21:24
【摘要】：在我国《民法总则》中,社会主义核心价值观在总体上未处于民法基本原则的地位,因其在构成要件和法律效果方面均较模糊,因而不是独立的裁判规范。但其为民法总则乃至民法典的目标、任务,不妨碍其中的平等、自由、公正、诚信等核心价值作为民法的基本原则。《民法总则》关于个人信息、数据、网络虚拟财产的规定属于指引性、"法源性"的条款,具有时代气息、初步满足实际生活的需要,引出制定具体规则的任务。承认宗教活动场所(组织)等团体的特别法人资格,将非法人组织作为第三民事主体,专设危难相助的特别制度,在特定情况下民政部门被首选为监护人,等等,这些都立足于中国现实、关注并解决中国问题,具有里程碑式的意义,值得鼓与呼。
[Abstract]:In China's General principles of Civil Law, the socialist core values are not in the position of the basic principles of civil law on the whole, because they are vague in terms of their constituent elements and legal effects, so they are not independent norms of adjudication. However, it is the goal and mission of the General provisions of Civil Law and even the Civil Code, without prejudice to the core values of equality, freedom, justice, integrity and other core values of the Civil Code as the basic principles of the Civil Law. About personal Information, data in the General principles of the Civil Code, The stipulation of the network virtual property belongs to the guidance, the "law source" clause, has the time breath, initially satisfies the actual life needs, leads to the task of making specific rules. Recognizing the special legal personality of groups such as places of religious activity (organizations), taking unincorporated organizations as the third civil subject, establishing a special system of assistance in distress, and selecting civil affairs departments as guardians under certain circumstances, and so on, All these are based on China's reality, pay attention to and solve the Chinese problem, with a landmark significance, worthy of drum and shout.
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目“法学方法论与中国民商法研究”(批准号:13AZD065) 清华大学自主科研计划课题“中国民法典编纂重大理论问题研究”(批准号:2015THZWJC01)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2446694
[Abstract]:In China's General principles of Civil Law, the socialist core values are not in the position of the basic principles of civil law on the whole, because they are vague in terms of their constituent elements and legal effects, so they are not independent norms of adjudication. However, it is the goal and mission of the General provisions of Civil Law and even the Civil Code, without prejudice to the core values of equality, freedom, justice, integrity and other core values of the Civil Code as the basic principles of the Civil Law. About personal Information, data in the General principles of the Civil Code, The stipulation of the network virtual property belongs to the guidance, the "law source" clause, has the time breath, initially satisfies the actual life needs, leads to the task of making specific rules. Recognizing the special legal personality of groups such as places of religious activity (organizations), taking unincorporated organizations as the third civil subject, establishing a special system of assistance in distress, and selecting civil affairs departments as guardians under certain circumstances, and so on, All these are based on China's reality, pay attention to and solve the Chinese problem, with a landmark significance, worthy of drum and shout.
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金重点项目“法学方法论与中国民商法研究”(批准号:13AZD065) 清华大学自主科研计划课题“中国民法典编纂重大理论问题研究”(批准号:2015THZWJC01)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郑跟党;试论非法人组织[J];中外法学;1996年05期
2 鲁夫;“非法人组织”与“其他组织”、“其他经济组织”[J];工商行政管理;1997年10期
3 周贤日;法人和非法人组织分类简论[J];国家检察官学院学报;2004年05期
4 夏旭阳;非法人组织的法律地位及其立法模式——兼评《民法(草案)》总则有关条文[J];法学杂志;2005年04期
5 毛晓丽;;浅论非法人组织的独立性[J];法制与经济(下旬刊);2008年09期
6 眭鸿明,陈爱武;非法人组织的困境及其法律地位[J];学术研究;2004年02期
7 范远洪;;论非法人组织的主体法律地位[J];职业时空;2007年21期
8 张胜先;第三民事主体——非法人组织的立法思考[J];求索;2002年04期
9 张力;;法人与非法人组织的体系区隔及其突破——以“类型序列论”改造《民法通则》第37条[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2007年05期
10 陈荣文;论“其他组织”在我国民事法律主体体系中的地位[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2004年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 张晓霞;试论非法人组织的法律地位及立法保护[D];华东政法大学;2007年
2 吕文秀;非法人组织民事法律地位研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年
3 雍自明;非法人组织主体资格理论研究[D];湖南大学;2009年
4 陈平;论非法人组织民事主体的制度构建[D];大连海事大学;2008年
，本文编号：2446694
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2446694.html
