我国专利授权确权中的“最宽合理解释”
发布时间：2019-03-28 11:37
【摘要】：美国在专利审查中采用"最宽合理解释",有别于地区法院的普通含义解释。美国的最宽合理解释适用于美国专利商标局的所有程序,包括双方复审程序。我国法院和专利复审委员会近年来也陆续提出了"最宽合理解释"。最宽合理解释在我国应适用于专利审查和复审程序,但不应适用于无效程序。
[Abstract]:The United States uses "broadest reasonable interpretation" in patent review, which is different from the common interpretation of district courts. The broadest and most reasonable interpretation in the United States applies to all procedures of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including the two-party review procedure. In recent years, China's courts and patent reexamination boards have also put forward the broadest and most reasonable explanation. The broadest reasonable interpretation should be applied to patent review and review procedure in our country, but not to invalid procedure.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学知识产权学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中国云计算知识产权问题与对策研究(批准号11&ZD179)”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.42
[Abstract]:The United States uses "broadest reasonable interpretation" in patent review, which is different from the common interpretation of district courts. The broadest and most reasonable interpretation in the United States applies to all procedures of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including the two-party review procedure. In recent years, China's courts and patent reexamination boards have also put forward the broadest and most reasonable explanation. The broadest reasonable interpretation should be applied to patent review and review procedure in our country, but not to invalid procedure.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学知识产权学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“中国云计算知识产权问题与对策研究(批准号11&ZD179)”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.42
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苗迎华;;关于中国专利审查中创造性判断的技术启示的思考[J];法制与社会;2008年27期
2 唐楹琰;刘昶;;论专利审查标准一致性[J];商品与质量;2012年S7期
3 时鹏;;由专利审查投诉平台的一个具体案例谈对法律说理的思考[J];中国发明与专利;2013年04期
4 彭飞荣;陶金宏;;风险社会背景下我国公众参与专利审查制度之探究[J];知识产权;2013年06期
5 谭明敏;张晓芳;张秀梅;;法律修养与专利审查[J];现代经济信息;2014年13期
6 琼升;在四万件发明专利申请积压的背后──专利审查员站在技术之巅评判发明的苦与乐[J];w挛胖芸，
本文编号：2448822
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2448822.html
