当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

人格权独立成编是中国民法典的不二选择

发布时间:2019-05-08 18:27
【摘要】:人格权独立成编,既是民法典体例问题,更是一个关系中国民法典能否适应现代中国社会的根本问题。德国人格权模式以人格和侵权来解决人格权问题,反映的是百年前的社会状况,完全不能适应现代社会尤其是现代中国的需要。只有人格权独立成编,才能充分容纳现代中国的人格权问题,才能科学规定现代中国的具体人格权,才能合理保护现代中国的人格利益。人格权独立成编,不仅可以改变德国人格权模式的体例,解放人格权发展的空间,而且也可以改变德国人格权模式的逻辑,将权利确认和防止侵权并重。《人格权法学者建议稿》的问世显示人格权独立成编完全可行,当然也有不少缺点,期望国家立法机关勇于承担历史责任,自觉追求民法典现代化和中国化,尽快将人格权编纳入立法计划。
[Abstract]:The independent compilation of the right of personality is not only a matter of civil code style, but also a fundamental problem related to whether the civil code of China can adapt to the modern Chinese society. The German model of personality right solves the problem of personality right by personality and tort, which reflects the social condition of 100 years ago and can not meet the needs of modern society, especially modern China. Only if the right of personality is compiled independently, can the problem of personality right of modern China be fully accommodated, the specific personality right of modern China can be stipulated scientifically, and the interests of personality of modern China can be reasonably protected. The independent formation of the personality right can not only change the style of the German personality right model, but also change the logic of the German personality right model as well as the space for the development of the right to liberate the personality right. Putting equal emphasis on the recognition of rights and the prevention of infringement. The publication of the draft of the Scholars' recommendations on the Law of personal Rights shows that the independent compilation of personality rights is completely feasible, and of course there are many shortcomings. It is expected that the national legislature will have the courage to assume historical responsibilities. Consciously pursue the modernization and Sinicization of the Civil Code and incorporate personality rights into the legislative plan as soon as possible.
【作者单位】: 武汉大学法学院;
【分类号】:D923

【相似文献】

相关硕士学位论文 前4条

1 魏晓阳;标表型人格权的法律保护研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2017年

2 陈如炮;大数据时代个人信息之私权保护路径研究[D];中国政法大学;2016年

3 禹旭辉;论人格权的概念及在民法中的地位[D];华中科技大学;2015年

4 王美;我国人格权立法模式的选择[D];山东大学;2017年



本文编号:2472133

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2472133.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3e5be***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com