诚信原则在商标与商号权利冲突解决中的司法适用

发布时间：2019-05-09 22:41

【摘要】：商标与商号权利冲突一直是法院在司法实践中处理案件中的重点与难点。在人民法院审理的所有不正当竟争纠纷案件中,两者权利冲突的案件占了相当大的比重。为了解决商标与字号的争议,虽然我国《商标法》、《反不正当竞争法》以及相关司法解释做了一些规定,如商号的突出使用直接构成商标侵权的规定,又如使用与他人相同的商号作为商标注册构成对他人企业名称的侵害,但是这些规定在内容上不够全面和明晰,没有涵盖商标与字号争议的所有情况。文章主要从司法适用的视角对商标与商号的权利冲突的解决进行了研究与分析。通过对法院在解决两者之间权利冲突的法律依据的分析发现,现有法律和司法解释对两者权利冲突的解决规定不全面,存在司法漏洞,诚信原则成为法院解决两者之间权利冲突的主要法律依据。文章对法院主要适用诚信原则处理商标与商号权利冲突的原因分别从两者之间权利冲突的特点、诚信原则的优势、社会公平等多方面进行了深入分析,说明其适用的合理性以及必要性。文章还对法院在实践中的相关案例进行了分析并发现,法院在适用诚信原则处理两者权利冲突时所考量的因素已趋于成熟与稳定,最后的裁判文书的判决结果也相对确定,很少出现法院适用诚信原则随意判决的情况。最后,文章对法院在司法实践中适用诚信原则解决商标与商号权利冲突时提出了完善的建议,也希望对以后两者之间权利冲突更好的解决有所裨益。
[Abstract]:The conflict between trademark and trade name rights has always been the key and difficult point for the court to deal with cases in judicial practice. Among all the unfair disputes heard by the people's court, the conflict of rights accounts for a considerable proportion. In order to solve the dispute between trademark and font, although China's Trademark Law, Anti-unfair Competition Law and related judicial interpretation have made some provisions, such as the prominent use of trade names directly constitutes trademark infringement. For example, the use of the same trade name as others as trademark registration constitutes an infringement on the name of other people's enterprises, but these provisions are not comprehensive and clear in content and do not cover all the cases of trademark and name disputes. This paper mainly studies and analyzes the solution of the conflict between trademark and trade name from the perspective of judicial application. Through the analysis of the legal basis of the court in resolving the conflict of rights between the two, it is found that the existing laws and judicial interpretations are not comprehensive in the resolution of the conflict of rights between the two, and there are judicial loopholes. The principle of good faith has become the main legal basis for the court to solve the conflict of rights between the two. This paper makes a deep analysis on the reasons why the court mainly applies the principle of good faith to deal with the conflict of rights between trademark and trade name from the characteristics of the conflict of rights between the two, the advantages of the principle of good faith, social fairness and so on. Explain the rationality and necessity of its application. The article also analyzes the relevant cases of the court in practice and finds that the factors considered by the court in applying the principle of good faith to deal with the conflict of rights between the two have become mature and stable, and the judgment results of the final adjudication documents are also relatively certain. There are few cases in which the court applies the principle of good faith to decide at will. Finally, the paper puts forward some perfect suggestions for the court to apply the principle of good faith to solve the conflict between trademark and trade name rights in judicial practice, and also hopes to solve the conflict of rights between the two in a better way.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】