责任转质之证立及制度重构

发布时间：2019-05-23 01:47

【摘要】：我国现行立法对责任转质的态度模棱两可,容易引发纠纷。从效率维度上看,责任转质确实有其正当性,既可以促使物尽其用,也可弥补承诺转质难以取得出质人同意之不足。在责任转质的制度设计上,要兼顾物尽其用和保护出质人利益,明确责任转质能否成立应视质押物的类型而定,转质权应依附于原质权,同时应建立出质人与质权人之间的利益分享机制。在责任转质的具体构建上,要将"转质权所担保的债权期限不得超过原质权所担保的债权"与"质物是可替代物"作为责任转质的构成条件;同时,要赋予出质人清偿对象选择权以及当质物损坏时直接向转质权人追偿等权利。
[Abstract]:The current legislation of our country is ambiguous about the quality of responsibility, which is easy to cause disputes. From the perspective of efficiency, the transfer of responsibility to quality does have its legitimacy, which can not only promote the best use of things, but also make up for the difficulty of obtaining the consent of the pledge. In the system design of responsibility transfer, we should take into account the best use of the material and protect the interests of the pledge, and make it clear that the establishment of the responsibility transfer depends on the type of pledge, and the right of pledge should be attached to the original pledge. At the same time, the benefit sharing mechanism between the pledgee and the pledgee should be established. In the specific construction of the transfer of liability, it is necessary to take "the term of the creditor's rights guaranteed by the pledge shall not exceed the creditor's rights guaranteed by the original pledge" and "the pledge is a substitute" as the constituent conditions of the transfer of responsibility. At the same time, it is necessary to give the pledger the option of paying off the object and the right to recover directly from the pledgee when the pledge is damaged.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学民商法学院;北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】