我国商号权保护的不足及完善新论

发布时间：2018-03-25 03:12

本文选题：商号　切入点：商标　出处：《山东大学》2009年硕士论文

【摘要】： 从各国的商法实践中,可以看到商号权法律制度一直是各国商事立法中的重头戏——各国均把商号权的保护作为本国商事立法的一个极其重要的方面。商号权的保护关乎整个市场经济良性循环地发展,对于我国建立良好的商业秩序起着不可替代的作用。在当代中国,不法侵害人以各种各样的途径侵犯商号权人对商号的使用权,对原权利人造成了重大的损害,但中国相关法规缺乏对商号侵权案件的规制。通过本论题的研究,一方面可以对商号权诸多纠纷进行梳理,另一方面通过对中国与发达国家商号权立法的比较,找出中国商号立法的不足,并针对这些不足提出自己的一些拙见。论文从一开始就宏观地介绍了一下中国在商号权立法上的现状,让读者有一个初步的认识。对整篇文章起着一个提携作用。为了让文章更易接受,紧接着介绍了商号权的基本内涵,并详细指出了商号权与其他近似权利的区别,以平缓的方式自然过度到商号权在实践及理论上的现状。对于商号权现状问题,主要是介绍了中外商号权立法实践及理论上的现状,这部分基本上涵盖了世界上大部分国家的商号权立法实践情况,对在宏观上把握商号权保护的现状有重要的作用。从商号权的现状中,细致分析一下就可以发现中国商号权立法的不足。这种不足是由于多种因素造成的,如商号立法效力层次不够,各种商号权立法的体系性不足等。集中表现在以下几个方面:其一是我国商事法规对于商号权的定性不甚明朗;其二是我国商号权立法的位阶层次不够,效力不高。其三是我国商法对于商号权的保护的范围及程度与其他国家相比,相对较为狭窄。在找出中国商事立法缺陷与不足的情况下,本文立足比较法,从中外商事立法在商号权保护的比较中出发,进一步阐述中国商号权立法的不足,使得读者的认识更为深刻。在比较中,我们不难发现,中国商事立法存在的问题是复杂多样的。中国商号权立法在选用原则、保护的范围、不正当使用商号的形态以及商号转让的债务承担上所暴露出来的问题是中国商事立法所从未涉及的。要解决商号权立法中所存在的问题,不得不对商号权进行细致、透彻的分析,从而在本质上找出商号权与其他权利所不同之处,这有助于解决中国商号权诸多问题。从源头与本质上分析商号权,是开启中国商号权与诸多权利纠纷的钥匙。本文前四个部分分别从不同角度提出了中国商号权立法的不足,是一种宏观、抽象的列举,使我们对于商号权立法的不足有着更加深刻的认知。最后我们针对前面论述中所提出的问题,综合、系统的提出了多种解决问题的方式和方法,如为中国商号权立法建立一个统一的原则、在中国的商号权立法上明确中国商号权的性质、完善统一中国的商号权立法、并建议在以后的中国商号权立法实践中尽量吸取外国商号权立法及理论中所获得的宝贵实践,希望为中国商号权的立法实践、理论研究和广大商号权人的维权提供了新的思路和途径。
[Abstract]:From the practice of commercial law, we can see the legal system of trade name has been the business of major legislation, all countries have the right of trade name protection as a matter of national legislation is extremely important. The protection of trade name rights in relation to the whole market economy to develop a virtuous circle, in order to establish a good business I play irreplaceable role. In modern Chinese, illegal violations of the right to use the right of business firms in a variety of ways, the right to cause significant damage, but China regulations lack of regulation of trade name infringement cases. Through the research of this thesis, one can sort of trade name right a lot of disputes, on the other hand, through the comparison of the right of trade name China with developed countries legislation, find out the Chinese firm legislation, and solve these problems put forward some of his views.
From the beginning to introduce a macro situation in China trade name right legislation, let readers have a preliminary understanding. Plays the role of a carrying of the whole article. In order to make the article more accepted, then introduces the basic connotation of the right of trade name, and pointed out to right and other the approximate right difference, current situation in order to smooth the way over to the firm a natural right in practice and theory. The status quo for the right firms, mainly introduces the current situation of Chinese foreign trade name right legislation practice and theory, this part basically covers most countries in the world trade name right of the legislative practice, have important the role of the situation in the macro name right protection. From the present situation of the right of trade name, the detailed analysis can be found that lack of China name right legislation. This is due to many factors, such as trade legislation. The force level is not enough, a variety of business legislative system is inadequate. Concentrated in the following aspects: one is qualitative for the right of trade name of commercial law in China is not very clear; the second is a right of legislation of our business class is not enough, the effectiveness is not high. The third is the scope of protection of commercial law in China for business the right and extent compared with other countries, the relatively narrow. The defects China commercial legislation and deficiencies, based on the comparison, from the Chinese and foreign commercial legislation in the protection of the right of trade name, further elaborates the lack of China legislative power firm, has a more profound understanding of the reader in the comparison. And it is not difficult to find, there Chinese commercial legislation problems are complex. Chinese trade name right legislation in the selection principle, the scope of protection, the improper use of debt in the form of firm and firm commitment on the transfer The problems exposed are China business has never been involved in legislation. In order to solve the existing legislation of the right of trade name, trade name right to conduct detailed and thorough analysis, which in essence, find the right business rights with other differences, which helps to solve many problems China name right from the right of trade name. The source and nature, is open China firm right and many rights disputes key. This paper first four part puts forward the Chinese firm right legislation from different angles, is a macro, abstract list, so that we have a more profound understanding for the lack of the trade name right legislation.
At last we discussed earlier in the comprehensive questions, put forward a variety of system and the ways to solve the problems, such as the establishment of a unified principle Chinese firm right legislation, clear the nature of the right of trade name in the China China firm right legislation, perfect unity of the right of trade name legislation, and suggests that in after the China trade name right in legislation and practice to learn valuable practice for foreign trade name right legislation and theory, hope for Chinese legislative practice of the right of trade name, and provides a new way for theoretical research and the trade name right of human rights.

【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D923.43

【引证文献】