海难救助与共同海损制度之比较研究
发布时间：2018-07-17 18:38
【摘要】：本文共分五章,针对海商法上较为古老的两项制度—海难救助制度和共同海损制度,结合实务中的问题,尝试着进行比较研究,并提出两项制度未来发展完善的建议。 本文除开篇引言外,首先第一章从理论上,对海难救助和共同海损制度的概念、形式以及构成要件进行了简略的介绍,试图首先从理论上对二者进行分析说明,使读者对本文研究分析的对象有一个初步的理论了解和认识。 接下来,本文第二章对海难救助和共同海损制度之间的理论交叉点进行了详细的比较分析,包括二者在理论上的共同点和不同点,就部分要点进行了较为深入的分析,并提出了笔者的理解。 本文第三章,笔者前两章理论分析的基础之上,挑选了现今海上航运实务中两个较为热门的话题——船舶保险和海盗问题——中涉及海难救助和共同海损制度的方面进行进一步的分析。 作为本文的重要部分,第四章分析了海难救助和共同海损制度未来发展的趋势,指出目前制度的缺陷、不足,并对两项制度的完善提出了笔者自己的建议。 本文参考的法律主要是中国法、国际公约及国际惯例,并根据我国《海商法》第二百六十八条关于法律适用顺序的规定,中国缔结或者参加的国际条约与《海商法》规定不同的,除非中国声明保留某些条款,本文适用国际条约进行分析；若国际公约与国内法均没有规定,则适用国际惯例或相关通用的格式合同进行分析。
[Abstract]:This paper is divided into five chapters, aiming at the two ancient systems in maritime law, the salvage system and the general average system, combined with the problems in practice, this paper tries to make a comparative study, and puts forward some suggestions for the future development of the two systems. In addition to the introduction, the first chapter gives a brief introduction to the concepts, forms and elements of salvage and general average system in theory. So that readers have a preliminary theoretical understanding and understanding of the object of this study and analysis. Then, the second chapter makes a detailed comparative analysis of the theoretical intersection between salvage and general average system, including the common points and differences between the two in theory, and makes a more in-depth analysis of some key points. And put forward the author's understanding. In the third chapter, based on the theoretical analysis of the first two chapters, This paper selects two hot topics in the practice of maritime navigation, ship insurance and piracy, which involve salvage and general average system for further analysis. As an important part of this paper, the fourth chapter analyzes the future development trend of salvage and general average system, points out the defects and deficiencies of the current system, and puts forward my own suggestions for the perfection of the two systems. The laws referred to in this paper are mainly Chinese law, international conventions and international practices, and according to the provisions of Article 268 of the Maritime Law of China concerning the order of application of the law, If an international treaty to which China is a party is different from the provisions of the Maritime Law, unless China declares that it has reserved certain provisions, this article applies to the analysis of international treaties; if neither international conventions nor domestic law provide for them, The application of international practice or relevant common format contract for analysis.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19;D922.294
本文编号：2130574
[Abstract]:This paper is divided into five chapters, aiming at the two ancient systems in maritime law, the salvage system and the general average system, combined with the problems in practice, this paper tries to make a comparative study, and puts forward some suggestions for the future development of the two systems. In addition to the introduction, the first chapter gives a brief introduction to the concepts, forms and elements of salvage and general average system in theory. So that readers have a preliminary theoretical understanding and understanding of the object of this study and analysis. Then, the second chapter makes a detailed comparative analysis of the theoretical intersection between salvage and general average system, including the common points and differences between the two in theory, and makes a more in-depth analysis of some key points. And put forward the author's understanding. In the third chapter, based on the theoretical analysis of the first two chapters, This paper selects two hot topics in the practice of maritime navigation, ship insurance and piracy, which involve salvage and general average system for further analysis. As an important part of this paper, the fourth chapter analyzes the future development trend of salvage and general average system, points out the defects and deficiencies of the current system, and puts forward my own suggestions for the perfection of the two systems. The laws referred to in this paper are mainly Chinese law, international conventions and international practices, and according to the provisions of Article 268 of the Maritime Law of China concerning the order of application of the law, If an international treaty to which China is a party is different from the provisions of the Maritime Law, unless China declares that it has reserved certain provisions, this article applies to the analysis of international treaties; if neither international conventions nor domestic law provide for them, The application of international practice or relevant common format contract for analysis.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D996.19;D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李婧;杨奎臣;;试论我国共同海损制度的完善[J];法制与社会;2007年05期
2 岳瑞芳;;2004《约克—安特卫普规则》修改[J];法制与社会;2007年12期
3 于淼源;;船舶保险中海难救助相关问题[J];法制与社会;2010年33期
4 ;全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于我国加入《1989年国际救助公约》的决定[J];中华人民共和国国务院公报;1993年30期
5 李军;盛福深;;浅谈海事中的人为因素[J];中国海事;2006年05期
6 尚清;谈《约克安特卫普规则2004》对共同海损制度之影响[J];世界海运;2005年06期
7 毕仲辉;;海盗赎金能否作为共同海损理赔[J];科教导刊(中旬刊);2010年04期
8 陈若鸿;2004年《约克—安特卫普规则》修订综述[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年03期
9 俞天文;;共同海损制度仍应保留但需简化[J];中国海商法年刊;1992年00期
10 胡辉;论共同海损与救助款项[J];中国海商法年刊;1994年00期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 曾越凡;海难救助报酬法律问题研究[D];郑州大学;2004年
2 关阳;废除共同海损制度的可行性研究[D];大连海事大学;2007年
3 陈萍萍;当代共同海损制度的评价与发展趋势[D];上海海事大学;2007年
4 郭庆;索马里海盗赎金性质及保险赔付研究[D];大连海事大学;2010年
，本文编号：2130574
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2130574.html
