撤船法律问题研究
[Abstract]:This paper takes bareboat charter contract and term charter contract in Maritime Law as the research object, puts forward the concept of the right to withdraw ship, and analyzes the issue of withdrawal under Chinese law in combination with the General principles of Civil Law of China and the contract Law of China. At the same time, the relevant provisions and practices of Anglo-American law, through the case analysis, the practice of the legal knowledge of the right to withdraw ships and problems are systematically summarized and summarized. In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into five chapters and an attachment. The introduction briefly explains the practical significance of the study on the legal issue of ship withdrawal, and clarifies the scope and purpose of this study. The first chapter mainly discusses the basic theory of the right to withdraw ships, including the concept and legal nature of the right to withdraw ships. Chapter 2 mainly discusses the acquisition of the right to withdraw ships, including statutory acquisition, agreed acquisition and the relationship between the two. The third chapter mainly discusses several problems that should be paid attention to in the exercise of the right to withdraw ships: the clear and accurate expression of the intention of the notice of withdrawal and the choice of the timing of the withdrawal. Chapter 4 mainly discusses the loss of the right to withdraw ships, contrasts with the provisions of Chinese law and English law on abstaining and estoppel, the manifestation of the loss of the right of withdrawal and the legal consequences of the loss of the right of withdrawal of ships. The fifth chapter mainly discusses the consequences of the right to withdraw the ship, focusing on the analysis of the shipowner's right to compensation for legal damage after the correct withdrawal of the ship, as well as other forms of protection of the right. It also analyzes the charterer's right to indemnify the charterer and the right of compensation for damages. Attached to the attachment are two recent and representative cases of withdrawal, one of which is the "Guohong" case in the bareboat charter contract and the other is the "Li-Hai" case in the term charter contract.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2008
【分类号】:D922.294;D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 初北平;史强;;英国法下停租条款的作用与解释原则——评定期租船合同下的停租纠纷[J];世界海运;2011年09期
2 ;[J];;年期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 上海海事法院 张亮;定期租船合同中经营性支出费用由谁承担[N];中国贸易报;2006年
2 厦门海事法院 张希舟;合同解释应坚持客观主义与主观主义相结合[N];人民法院报;2006年
3 本报记者 陈煜儒;8000字裁决书述说中国法院管辖权[N];法制日报;2005年
4 傅斌;该笔车船使用税由谁“买单”?[N];海峡财经导报;2006年
5 记者 郑金雄 通讯员 李哲潳;仲裁机构约定不明[N];人民法院报;2005年
6 通讯员 刘卫红邋覃剑锋;接连爽约 俄籍轮船南通被扣[N];中国水运报;2008年
7 张东亮;第一季度铁矿石海运费堪称一波三折[N];中国冶金报;2006年
8 张东亮;铁矿石海运费猛涨原因何在[N];中国冶金报;2006年
9 王舜毕邋吴姿虹;首起特大仲裁中海事请求保全案[N];中国水运报;2007年
10 上海海事法院 刘怡如;承运人的航行过失能否免责?[N];国际商报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 王巾帼;论定期租船合同的性质[D];大连海事大学;2010年
2 陆玉;论定期租船合同的法律性质[D];大连海事大学;2010年
3 李丽;撤船法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2008年
4 新薇;定期租船合同下出租人的责任承担研究[D];大连海事大学;2009年
5 朱自真;论定期租船合同中租金支付条款下的出租人解除权及其相关问题[D];上海海事大学;2007年
6 边红;NYPE格式下停租条款涉及法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2006年
7 胡红林;定期租船合同转租法律问题研究[D];厦门大学;2009年
8 吴婧;定期租船合同若干重要条款研究[D];上海海事大学;2005年
9 丁丽琴;租船合同中涉及“租金”条款的法律研究[D];上海海事大学;2007年
10 黄刚;论期租船的租期[D];上海海事大学;2004年
,本文编号:2195510
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2195510.html