非洲商法统一组织仲裁制度与中国仲裁制度比较研究
发布时间：2018-10-22 08:07
【摘要】： 当今世界加速进入经济动荡、格局调整、体系变革的新阶段。在世界金融危机的大背景下,中非合作的规模将不断扩大,共同应对金融危机带来的冲击。因此,如何加深对非洲各国法律制度的理解,明晰中国法律制度与非洲法律制度的差异,以便在经济活动中把握各种法律风险,成为中国投资方普遍关注的问题。 非洲商法统一组织(OHADA)是由西非16个国家创建的一个区域性国际组织,其目的是对成员国国内商法进行协调,统一各成员国国内立法,从而减少贸易障碍,促进投资,发展各国的经济。OHADA已成为对非洲商法影响最大的组织之一,主要成就是制定了八部统一法,其中之一为《仲裁统一法》。同时,OHADA的最高司法机构司法与仲裁共同法院(CCJA)作为仲裁中心也有一套仲裁规则。因此,OHADA仲裁制度包括两套体系,即根据《仲裁统一法》进行的仲裁和在司法与仲裁共同法院内进行的仲裁。OHADA仲裁制度已经成为该地区解决商事争议最主要的机制。中国仲裁制度是以1994年颁布的《仲裁法》为主体,结合《民事诉讼法》关于仲裁的规定以及相关的司法解释形成的单一体系。 仲裁作为当今国际社会普遍认可的商事争议解决方式,在全世界范围内表现出一定的趋同性。因此,OHADA的仲裁制度与中国的仲裁制度在仲裁基本原则方面表现出一定的相似性。但是,由于地理环境、历史发展过程、经济发展水平等方面的差异,二者在仲裁的定义、仲裁的分类以及仲裁法律制度的渊源等方面都诸多差异。另外,就具体的仲裁制度而言,二者在仲裁范围,仲裁协议、仲裁的组织形式、仲裁申请和受理、仲裁审理和裁决等方面既有相似之处也有差异之处。OHADA仲裁制度相对于中国仲裁制度而言,要更加开放,对于仲裁也持更为支持的态度。 总而言之,通过对比较研究,我们能够很好的明晰二者在仲裁理论和仲裁基本制度方面的主要差异。对于中国投资者在非投资争议解决具有指导意义。同时,中国《仲裁法》修改时也可以考虑借鉴OHADA仲裁制度中的合理内核。
[Abstract]:Today the world is accelerating into a new stage of economic turmoil, structural adjustment, and system change. In the context of the world financial crisis, the scale of China-Africa cooperation will continue to expand, to jointly cope with the impact of the financial crisis. Therefore, how to deepen the understanding of African countries' legal system and clarify the difference between Chinese legal system and African legal system, in order to grasp various legal risks in economic activities, has become a common concern of Chinese investors. The Organization for the Harmonization of Commercial Law in Africa (OHADA) is a regional international organization founded by 16 countries in West Africa, whose aim is to harmonize the domestic commercial laws of member States and harmonize their domestic legislation, thereby reducing trade barriers and promoting investment. OHADA has become one of the most influential organizations in commercial law in Africa. Its main achievement is the enactment of eight uniform laws, one of which is the uniform Arbitration Act. At the same time, (CCJA), the common court of justice and arbitration, the supreme judicial body of OHADA, also has a set of arbitration rules as the arbitration center. Therefore, OHADA arbitration system includes two sets of systems, that is, arbitration under uniform Law of Arbitration and Arbitration in the Common Court of Judicature and Arbitration. OHADA arbitration system has become the most important mechanism for settling commercial disputes in this region. The arbitration system of China is a single system based on the Arbitration Law promulgated in 1994, combined with the provisions of the Civil procedure Law on arbitration and related judicial interpretations. Arbitration, as a universally accepted commercial dispute settlement method in the international community, shows some convergence all over the world. Therefore, the arbitration system of OHADA and the arbitration system of China show some similarities in the basic principles of arbitration. However, due to the differences in geographical environment, historical development process, economic development level and so on, there are many differences in the definition of arbitration, the classification of arbitration and the origin of arbitration legal system. In addition, as far as the specific arbitration system is concerned, the scope of arbitration, the arbitration agreement, the form of organization of arbitration, the application for arbitration and the acceptance of the arbitration, The arbitration system of OHADA should be more open and supportive than that of China. In a word, through the comparative study, we can clarify the main differences between the two in the arbitration theory and the arbitration basic system. For Chinese investors in non-investment dispute resolution has guiding significance. At the same time, the reasonable core of OHADA arbitration system can be taken into account in the revision of Chinese Arbitration Law.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D925.7
本文编号：2286595
[Abstract]:Today the world is accelerating into a new stage of economic turmoil, structural adjustment, and system change. In the context of the world financial crisis, the scale of China-Africa cooperation will continue to expand, to jointly cope with the impact of the financial crisis. Therefore, how to deepen the understanding of African countries' legal system and clarify the difference between Chinese legal system and African legal system, in order to grasp various legal risks in economic activities, has become a common concern of Chinese investors. The Organization for the Harmonization of Commercial Law in Africa (OHADA) is a regional international organization founded by 16 countries in West Africa, whose aim is to harmonize the domestic commercial laws of member States and harmonize their domestic legislation, thereby reducing trade barriers and promoting investment. OHADA has become one of the most influential organizations in commercial law in Africa. Its main achievement is the enactment of eight uniform laws, one of which is the uniform Arbitration Act. At the same time, (CCJA), the common court of justice and arbitration, the supreme judicial body of OHADA, also has a set of arbitration rules as the arbitration center. Therefore, OHADA arbitration system includes two sets of systems, that is, arbitration under uniform Law of Arbitration and Arbitration in the Common Court of Judicature and Arbitration. OHADA arbitration system has become the most important mechanism for settling commercial disputes in this region. The arbitration system of China is a single system based on the Arbitration Law promulgated in 1994, combined with the provisions of the Civil procedure Law on arbitration and related judicial interpretations. Arbitration, as a universally accepted commercial dispute settlement method in the international community, shows some convergence all over the world. Therefore, the arbitration system of OHADA and the arbitration system of China show some similarities in the basic principles of arbitration. However, due to the differences in geographical environment, historical development process, economic development level and so on, there are many differences in the definition of arbitration, the classification of arbitration and the origin of arbitration legal system. In addition, as far as the specific arbitration system is concerned, the scope of arbitration, the arbitration agreement, the form of organization of arbitration, the application for arbitration and the acceptance of the arbitration, The arbitration system of OHADA should be more open and supportive than that of China. In a word, through the comparative study, we can clarify the main differences between the two in the arbitration theory and the arbitration basic system. For Chinese investors in non-investment dispute resolution has guiding significance. At the same time, the reasonable core of OHADA arbitration system can be taken into account in the revision of Chinese Arbitration Law.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D925.7
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 刘俊,朱志权,周春华;联合国仲裁示范法与中国仲裁法比较研究[J];抚州师专学报;2003年01期
2 吴莲;中国仲裁制度与国际商事仲裁制度的发展与趋同[J];广西公安管理干部学院学报;2000年03期
3 朱伟东;非洲国际商法统一化与协调化[J];西亚非洲;2003年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张蔷;国际商事仲裁制度研究[D];山东大学;2006年
2 汪世芳;OHADA公路货物运输统一法及对中国的启示[D];湘潭大学;2007年
，本文编号：2286595
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/sflw/2286595.html
