我国第三人撤销之诉制度完善研究

发布时间：2018-01-29 22:58

本文关键词： 第三人撤销之诉既判力权利救济立法完善　出处：《西北大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：为了应对虚假诉讼,保障未参加原诉讼审理,却受到原审判决不利影响的第三人的实体权益,同时,也对我国现有保护第三人权益的民事诉讼救济制度进行补充,《民事诉讼法》修改后将第三人撤销之诉制度纳入了我国民事诉讼法框架内,该制度的确立,不仅拓宽了理论界的研究范围,而且还对我国程序法的完善起到一定的推动作用。本文拟从理论上阐述第三人撤销之诉的含义及理论基础,通过考察研究域外立法现状,从我国的司法实际出发,总结我国第三人撤销之诉制度功能实现的障碍,并提出完善路径。文章将在绪论和结语之外,着重从四个部分进行相应的讨论分析：第一部分主要包括两方面的内容,一方面是对第三人撤销之诉制度进行界定,明确其概念与特征,使之与其他的第三人救济制度区别开来；另一方面通过分析研究第三人撤销之诉的理论基础,从而加深对我国第三人撤销之诉制度的认识。第二部分主要从比较法的角度对世界主要国家的法律规定进行分析,从而进一步的认识第三人撤销之诉在理论研究和制度方面的构建。第三人撤销之诉最早在法国得到确立,在我国引入比较早的地区是台湾和澳门特别行政区。可以对这些国家、地区的第三人撤销之诉的主体、客体和程序等方面进行分析,以探析成熟的第三人撤销之诉制度的构建模式。第三部分通过对我国当前第三人撤销之诉制度在现有规定下所存在的功能实现障碍的探索分析,进而从我国立法层面和实践层面进行相应的研究,从而对我国第三人撤销之诉制度存在的不足之处进行反思,以期使该制度发挥其应有的作用。第四部分主要在借鉴各国家、地区的成熟经验的基础上,根据我国具体司法实际提出相应的完善措施,包括应当调整该制度的立法体例,扩大原告范围、扩大受案法院范围、建立双重起诉期间标准、协调第三人撤销之诉与其他第三人救济制度等。
[Abstract]:In order to deal with the false litigation, to protect the substantive rights and interests of the third party who did not participate in the original litigation trial, but were adversely affected by the original trial judgment, at the same time. It also supplements the existing civil litigation relief system of protecting the rights and interests of the third party. After the amendment of the Civil procedure Law, the system of the third party's revocation is brought into the framework of our civil procedure law, and the system is established. Not only broaden the scope of theoretical research, but also play a role in promoting the perfection of procedural law in China. This paper intends to theoretically explain the meaning and theoretical basis of the third party's revocation action. By investigating and studying the current situation of foreign legislation and proceeding from the judicial reality of our country, this paper summarizes the obstacles to the realization of the function of the third party revocation system in our country, and puts forward the perfect path. The article will be in addition to the introduction and conclusion. Focus on four parts of the corresponding discussion and analysis: the first part mainly includes two aspects of the content, on the one hand, the third party to withdraw the system of action to define, clear its concept and characteristics. To distinguish it from the other third party relief system; On the other hand, through the analysis of the third party to withdraw the theoretical basis of action. The second part mainly analyzes the legal provisions of the major countries in the world from the perspective of comparative law. Thus further understanding of the third party revocation in the theoretical research and system construction. The third party revocation action was first established in France. Taiwan and Macao Special Administrative region are the early regions in our country. We can analyze the subject, object and procedure of the third party's revocation in these countries and regions. By analyzing the mature third party revocation of the system of construction mode. The third part through the current third party revocation of the system under the existing provisions of the functional obstacles to the exploration and analysis. Then from the legislative level and the practical level of the corresponding research, so as to reflect on the deficiencies of the third party revocation system in our country. In order to make the system play its due role. 4th part mainly on the basis of the mature experience of various countries and regions according to the specific judicial practice of our country put forward the corresponding improvement measures. It includes adjusting the legislative style of the system, enlarging the scope of the plaintiff, expanding the scope of the court of the case, establishing the standard of double prosecution period, coordinating the third party's revocation action with the other third party's relief system, and so on.
【学位授予单位】：西北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】