刑事鉴定意见问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 10:24

本文选题：鉴定意见 + 本质属性　；参考：《中国青年政治学院》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：鉴定意见是刑事诉讼法定证据类型之一,目的在于解决诉讼涉及的专门性问题,帮助查明和认定案件事实。然而,在我国刑事鉴定制度中,刑事鉴定意见规则存在很多问题,如刑事鉴定意见概念界定模糊、性质定位不清;鉴定启动程序规定不合理;鉴定人出庭质证条件过严、专家辅助人制度不健全;鉴定意见的采信标准不明确,法官自由心证过大等。文章以刑事鉴定意见内涵与属性的研究为基础,分别展开对刑事鉴定意见的启动、质证、认证程序探讨,旨在解决刑事鉴定意见规则中的问题,促进我国刑事鉴定意见制度的完善。第一部分主要是提出文章论题。在分析鉴定的本质属性与法律价值的基础上,讨论鉴定意见的基本概念,以及由此引出的鉴定意见启动、质证与认证问题。第二部分围绕着鉴定意见的启动问题展开。由于对鉴定启动权性质的不同理解,形成当事人启动模式和职权主义启动模式。通过对这两种启动模式的评析,借鉴其合理之处,从而完善我国鉴定意见启动模式。第三部分着重探讨鉴定意见的质证问题。鉴定意见要具备证据能力,必须在严格证明下,进行法庭调查。同时,结合我国现有法律规定,对鉴定意见质证中的基本问题如鉴定人出庭作证制度、交叉询问制度与专家辅助人制度展开探讨。第四部分涉及鉴定意见认证问题。鉴定意见作为定案依据,不仅要求鉴定意见具备证据能力,而且具有证明力。法官对证明力的判断,主要凭借自由心证,但法官的自由心证是有限制的。此外,法官对鉴定意见的采信理由需要公开,接受公众监督。第五部分是结语,就刑事鉴定意见问题进行总结,并提出自己的观点。
[Abstract]:Appraisal opinion is one of the types of evidence established by the Criminal procedure Law, the purpose of which is to solve the specialized problems involved in the lawsuit and help to find out and identify the facts of the case. However, in our criminal identification system, there are many problems in the rules of criminal identification opinion, such as the definition of criminal appraisal opinion is vague, the nature is not clear, the procedure for the initiation of identification is unreasonable, and the conditions for cross-examination in court are too strict. The system of expert assistant is not perfect, the standard of acceptance of appraisal opinion is not clear, the judge is free to testify too much, and so on. Based on the study of the connotation and attribute of criminal expertise opinion, the paper discusses the initiation, cross-examination and authentication procedure of criminal identification opinion, aiming at solving the problems in the rules of criminal identification opinion. To promote the perfection of the opinion system of criminal appraisal in our country. The first part mainly puts forward the article topic. On the basis of analyzing the essential attribute and legal value of appraisal, this paper discusses the basic concept of appraisal opinion and the problems of initiation, cross-examination and authentication. The second part revolves around the appraisal opinion initiation question. Due to the different understanding of the nature of the appraising right to start, it forms the starting mode of the parties and the mode of the doctrine of authority. Through the analysis and analysis of these two startup modes, we can use them for reference and perfect our country's appraisal opinion starting mode. The third part focuses on the question of cross-examination of appraisal opinions. The appraisal opinion must have the evidence ability, must carry on the court investigation under the strict proof. At the same time, combined with the existing laws and regulations of our country, this paper probes into the basic problems in the cross-examination of appraisal opinions, such as the system of witnesses appearing in court, the system of cross-examination and the system of expert assistant. The fourth part deals with the authentication of appraisal opinions. Appraisal opinion, as the basis of final decision, not only requires the appraisal opinion to have the evidence ability, but also has the proof power. The judge's judgment on the power of proof mainly depends on the free evidence, but the judge's free evidence is limited. In addition, the reasons for the judge's acceptance of the opinion need to be made public and subject to public scrutiny. The fifth part is the conclusion, summarizes the criminal appraisal opinion question, and puts forward own viewpoint.
【学位授予单位】：中国青年政治学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】