审判者之辨

发布时间：2018-05-15 00:01

本文选题：审判权 + 法院改革　；参考：《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：对于审委会参与的案件,从合议庭审理,经院庭长监督、审委会决定、合议庭制作裁判文书,再回到院庭长签发,审判权的运行形成了一个复合性圆环。案件审判的多主体参与和主体间的等级关系是造成审判权行政化和审判责任悬置的主要原因。审判权运行的这一圆环模式具有典型性,各类案件审判中的行政化现象都可以由之得到说明。审判权运行机制改革应以抽象审判权和具体审判权的区分为基础,以实现"让审理者裁判、由裁判者负责"。
[Abstract]:For the cases in which the adjudication committee participates, from the collegial panel hearing, supervising the president of the court, deciding that the collegial panel makes the judgment documents, and then returning to the president of the court to sign the case, the operation of the judicial power forms a compound circle. The multi-subject participation and the hierarchical relationship between the subjects are the main reasons for the judicial power to be administrated and the trial responsibility to be suspended. The circular pattern of judicial power operation is typical, and the administrative phenomenon in all kinds of cases can be explained by it. The reform of the operating mechanism of judicial power should be based on the distinction between abstract jurisdiction and specific jurisdiction, so as to "let the adjudicator judge and be responsible by the adjudicator".
【作者单位】：辽宁大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“当代中国权利立法研究”(项目编号:15JJD820004) 北京政治文明建设研究基地课题“京津冀立法协调研究”(项目编号:17ZZWM005) “辽宁特聘教授支持计划”资助
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】