论小额诉讼程序的实证分析
发布时间：2018-08-19 18:24
【摘要】：我国新民事诉讼法将小额诉讼程序正式纳入现行法律范畴内，该程序是以提高办案效率促进司法服务大众为目的建立起来的，有别于普通程序和简易程序而独立运作的诉讼程序。该程序的确立对我国诉讼体系的完善，与国际司法改革的接轨都具有深远意义。但从新民诉法修订意见征求稿到新民诉法正式颁布施行，有关小额诉讼程序的争论在业界一直未有停息，且新法对此程序的规定较笼统模糊，司法实践中存在社会认知度低、适用率低、操作不统一等问题。为解决上述问题，笔者希望通过撰写此文，以实例来论证我国现行小额诉讼程序存在的可取性及弊端，结合国外多国小额诉讼程序的优缺点以及我国司法现状，从简化司法程序、确保司法公正、防止滥讼三方面着手，以期完善现行我国小额诉讼程序的相应规定、服务司法。 本文主要通过分析宁波市北仑区人民法院2013年1月至6月期间受理的小额诉讼案件，以及与其他诉讼程序案件之间存在的差异等进行比较，特别是对比较典型的物业服务合同纠纷案件从多角度予以量化，，从中不难得出小额诉讼程序有其自身的优点，也存在不容忽视的司法问题亟待解决。结果国外经验，提出具体改善措施，以期使小额诉讼程序更完善。
[Abstract]:The new civil procedure law of our country formally brings the small claims procedure into the scope of the current law. The procedure is established for the purpose of improving the efficiency of handling cases and promoting the judicial service to the public. A procedure that operates independently of ordinary and summary proceedings. The establishment of this procedure is of great significance to the perfection of our litigation system and to the international judicial reform. However, from the draft of the revised opinions of the New Civil Action Law to the formal promulgation and implementation of the New Civil procedure Law, the debate on the small claims procedure has not stopped in the industry, and the provisions of the new law on this procedure are relatively general and vague, and there is a low degree of social awareness in the judicial practice. The application rate is low, the operation is not uniform and so on. In order to solve the above problems, the author hopes to prove the desirability and malpractice of the current small claims procedure in our country by writing this article, combining the advantages and disadvantages of the small claims procedure in many foreign countries as well as the judicial status quo of our country. From the three aspects of simplifying judicial procedure, ensuring judicial justice and preventing litigation abuse, the author hopes to perfect the corresponding provisions of the current small claims procedure in our country and serve the administration of justice. This paper mainly analyzes the small lawsuit cases accepted by the Beilun District people's Court of Ningbo City from January to June 2013, as well as the differences between them and other procedural cases. In particular, it is not difficult to quantify the typical dispute cases of property service contract from various angles. It is not difficult to draw the conclusion that the small claims procedure has its own advantages, and there are also some judicial problems that can not be ignored to be solved. Results Foreign experience and specific improvement measures were put forward in order to improve the small claims procedure.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
本文编号：2192461
[Abstract]:The new civil procedure law of our country formally brings the small claims procedure into the scope of the current law. The procedure is established for the purpose of improving the efficiency of handling cases and promoting the judicial service to the public. A procedure that operates independently of ordinary and summary proceedings. The establishment of this procedure is of great significance to the perfection of our litigation system and to the international judicial reform. However, from the draft of the revised opinions of the New Civil Action Law to the formal promulgation and implementation of the New Civil procedure Law, the debate on the small claims procedure has not stopped in the industry, and the provisions of the new law on this procedure are relatively general and vague, and there is a low degree of social awareness in the judicial practice. The application rate is low, the operation is not uniform and so on. In order to solve the above problems, the author hopes to prove the desirability and malpractice of the current small claims procedure in our country by writing this article, combining the advantages and disadvantages of the small claims procedure in many foreign countries as well as the judicial status quo of our country. From the three aspects of simplifying judicial procedure, ensuring judicial justice and preventing litigation abuse, the author hopes to perfect the corresponding provisions of the current small claims procedure in our country and serve the administration of justice. This paper mainly analyzes the small lawsuit cases accepted by the Beilun District people's Court of Ningbo City from January to June 2013, as well as the differences between them and other procedural cases. In particular, it is not difficult to quantify the typical dispute cases of property service contract from various angles. It is not difficult to draw the conclusion that the small claims procedure has its own advantages, and there are also some judicial problems that can not be ignored to be solved. Results Foreign experience and specific improvement measures were put forward in order to improve the small claims procedure.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 彭荣华;;论我国经济诉讼中的小额诉讼程序[J];长沙铁道学院学报(社会科学版);2011年02期
2 刘敏;;论我国民事诉讼法修订的基本原理[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2006年04期
3 范愉;;司法资源供求失衡的悖论与对策 以小额诉讼为切入点[J];法律适用;2011年03期
4 黄琨;李娟;;浅析比较法视野下理性构建我国小额诉讼制度——基于美、德两国的考察[J];法制与社会;2009年14期
5 付冠男;;浅谈我国小额诉讼程序的构建[J];法制与社会;2010年05期
6 吴劲;;小额诉讼程序实践中利与弊的冲突[J];法制与社会;2012年07期
7 付开燕;;论我国小额诉讼程序的构建——结合我国基层法院小额速裁程序试点工作开展情况[J];法制与社会;2012年10期
8 李江蓉;;论小额诉讼制度的司法困境与制度构建[J];法律适用;2012年08期
9 李纪森;;构建我国小额诉讼程序的设想[J];法制与社会;2012年23期
10 廖中洪;;小额诉讼立案标准与受理规则比较研究——兼论我国小额诉讼程序的立法完善[J];法治研究;2012年09期
本文编号：2192461
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/2192461.html
