论恶意诉讼及法律规制.pdf 全文免费在线阅读

  本文关键词：论恶意诉讼及其法律规制，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。

文档介绍：
对外经济贸易大学硕士学位论文论恶意诉讼及其法律规制姓名:任华申请学位级别:硕士专业:法律·民商法指导教师:苏号朋 20071001 摘要在本文引言部分,笔者指出恶意诉讼与民事诉讼相伴而生。民事诉讼被视为人们维护合法权益和解决争议的最重要手段,其价值与作用在我们的社会生活中得到了相当的体现。同时,由于种种原因,恶意诉讼现象与问题也越来越多,这不仅严重侵害了特定法律主体的合法权益、浪费司法资源和扰乱诉讼秩序,也对司法公正和诉讼价值构成了冲击与损害。恶意诉讼已受到一定的重视,但人们对其认识还比较缺乏,本文旨在通过对恶意诉讼相关问题研究,以求有效规制恶意诉讼之方案。本文正文共分为四个部分:第一部分论述恶意诉讼的含义及其与相关概念的区别,通过恶意诉讼行为的法理分析,指出恶意诉讼的性质具备两重性:其一、恶意诉讼行为违背诉讼目的或诉权正当行使的界限,是一种不正当的诉讼行为;其二、恶意诉讼行为因为主观存在恶意或故意,所实施的行为侵害了对方当事人的正当权益,又是一种侵权行为。通过与其他概念的辨析比较,得出恶意诉讼与滥用诉讼权利、诉讼欺诈这些概念不可等同。第二部分通过对恶意诉讼的成因分析,指出:诉讼具有负面效应、不法利益或非法目的驱动、个体法律知识与法律观念存在差异以及我国现行法律制度存在缺陷是造成恶意诉讼日益增多的主要原因。第三部分通过对两***系对恶意诉讼规制的比较研究,得出有效规制恶意诉讼行为需要借鉴外国的成功经验,对其进行实体法与程序法的双重规制。第四部分主要针对我国恶意诉讼的法律规制体系提出了规制手段和立法建议:其一、在民事诉讼法中确立规制恶意诉讼的诚实信用原则;其二、确立规制恶意诉讼的侵权损害赔偿责任制度。在本文结语中,笔者认为在我国法律地恶意诉讼进行具体规定之前,应当根据现有民事实体法与程序法的规定,对恶意诉讼积极处理,不断积累经验,在不远的将来实现对恶意诉讼的有效规制。关键词:恶意诉讼诚实信用侵权行为法律规制 ABSTRACT Inthe in订oducfion ofthearticle,the authorindicatesthatmalicious prosecution appears together 1)l,i血ci“llitigation.Wi山its value and functionapparently revealed in our sociallife.civillitigation isregarded船the most important re@arts ofprotecting people’S lawfulri曲ts and interestsand solving disputes.For variousreasons,more and mole malicious prosecution casgs haveappeared andcausedmany problems.which is a seriousinfiingement ofthelawfulrightsandinterestsofthespecific legalbody,a waste ofjudicial resources,a disturbance ofthecivilprocedule,an impact on thevalueof litigation,and abreach ofthejudicialjustice.People havebegun topay attention to maliciousprosecution butstilllack aclearideaofit.ThiSarticleanalyses thequestiOIlS related tomaliciousprosecution inorder toformulate aplan toeriectivelylegulate maliciousprosecution. 111emain body ofthearticleiSdividedintofourparts.In thefirstpart.the author elabomtes themeaning ofmalicious prosecution and thedifference between itand relatedconcepts such astheabuse ofprocedural fights andlitigation fraud.Besides. through thelegal analysis ofthe actofmaliciousprosecution,the authorindicates that malicious prosecution hastwo characters.First,it iSan incorrectlitigation actbecause has gone against thepurpose oflitigation or gone beyond thelimitoftheproper exerciseofthelitigiousright.Second,it is a丑act oftort because ithasinfringed on the iustrights andinterests oftheotherlitigant out ofsubjective malice ordeliberation.In thesecond part,by analyzing thecall∞ofmaliciousprosecution,the authorindicates thatmaliciousprosecution isdrivenbyillegal interests orpurposes andhas anegative effectand thatthedifferentknowledge levelof individuals aboutthelaw and thedefeet illChina’S current legal system arethe maincauses oftheincreasing cases ofmalicious prosecution.In the third pan,paring theregulatiOIlS ofthetwomajor law systems onmaliciousprosecution,the es to theconclusion that inorder to eriectively regulate maliciousprosecution,we shoulddraw on ESSfulexperience of other COWltries and adopt adouble legulafjon bining substantiallaw and procedural 1

1

  本文关键词：论恶意诉讼及其法律规制，，由笔耕文化传播整理发布。