“封杀”吸毒艺人的合宪性审查研究

发布时间：2018-02-10 18:14

本文关键词： 国家新闻出版广电总局吸毒艺人劳动权权利限制合宪性审查　出处：《浙江社会科学》2015年11期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文从国家新闻出版广电总局对吸毒艺人"封杀"即限制其劳动权的具体事例切入,研究限制吸毒者权利的合宪性。作者认为,公共利益内容的确定需要衡量,不应是一种大而化之的概括规定,需要用法律保留、比例原则、正当程序等技术性要件来审查。"封杀令"不但形式上不符合法律保留原则,而且内容上超出行政权范围随意处罚,违反我国《禁毒法》《戒毒条例》的禁止性规范。比较我国对吸毒者的职业准入或禁止的法律规范现状,让吸毒艺人彻底退出行业这种限制措施不够合理且过于严厉,法律规范不应对艺人赋予过高的道德和法律义务。"封杀令"本身规定不周延,不符合比例原则,违反正当程序,以间接的、非法治方式针对艺人,违反法不溯及既往原则,缺少必要的法律救济。
[Abstract]:This paper analyzes the constitutionality of restricting the rights of drug addicts by analyzing the specific cases of drug addicts being banned by the State Administration of Press, publication, Radio, Film and Television. The author believes that the determination of the content of public interest needs to be measured. It should not be a broad and general provision, and it needs to be examined with technical requirements such as legal reservation, proportionality principle, due process and so on. Not only is the "killing order" formally inconsistent with the principle of legal reservation, Moreover, the content goes beyond the scope of administrative power to punish arbitrarily, in violation of the prohibited norms of our country's "Drug Control Law", "Drug Addiction regulations," and compares the current situation of our country's legal norms concerning the occupational access or prohibition of drug addicts. Such restrictions as the complete withdrawal of drug addicts from the industry are unreasonable and too strict, and legal norms should not impose excessive moral and legal obligations on the entertainers. The kill order itself is not comprehensive, does not conform to the principle of proportionality, and violates due process. Indirect, non-rule of law for artists, in violation of the principle of non-retroactivity, the lack of necessary legal remedies.
【作者单位】：西北政法大学行政法学院;西北政法大学禁毒法律与政策研究所;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“吸毒管制的正当性与吸毒者人权保障法律问题研究”(项目编号10CFX021)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D669.8;D921

【相似文献】