一条宪法方法论的新进路——基于对服务型权威理论的评析

发布时间：2018-02-24 06:35

本文关键词： 法律权威宪法权威宪法解释方法论　出处：《浙江学刊》2015年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在对宪法权威来源这一重要宪法学命题的解读中,政治宪法学强调不成文宪法、政策与利益的权威性;宪法教义学强调价值和宪法文本的权威性。英国法理学家拉兹基于三个命题的"服务型"理论走一条不同于前人的权威阐释之路,给现代宪法学理论中关于宪法权威的讨论提供了一条介于事实和规范之间的新进路。宪法学作为一门理论性和实践性兼备的法律科学,既非重价值判断和价值选择的法伦理学,又非价值中立立足社会现实的法社会学。因此宪法权威理论的本质,乃是把"政治的宪法"与"文本的宪法"合二为一,在保持灵活性的同时不破坏价值性。从拉兹的权威理论所指示的方法论道路所得启示,有助于使我国宪法学研究摆脱事实与规范相脱节的尴尬困境,真正成为关切现实的规范学科。
[Abstract]:In the interpretation of the important constitutional proposition of constitutional authority, political constitutionalism emphasizes the authority of unwritten constitution, policy and interests. Constitutional dogmatics emphasizes the value and the authority of the constitutional text. The "service-oriented" theory of the British jurist Raz, based on three propositions, follows a different way from his predecessors' authoritative interpretation. It provides a new way between fact and norm to discuss constitutional authority in modern constitutional theory. As a legal science of both theory and practice, constitutional law is neither a legal ethics that emphasizes value judgment and value choice. Therefore, the essence of the constitutional authority theory is to combine the political Constitution with the text Constitution. From the methodological path indicated by Raz's authoritative theory, it is helpful to get rid of the awkward dilemma of disconnection between facts and norms in the study of constitutional jurisprudence in China. A normative discipline that is truly concerned with reality.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;山东大学法学院公法(宪政)研究所;
【分类号】：D921

【参考文献】