高校学生受教育平等权保障机制的完善

发布时间：2018-05-04 05:15

本文选题：平等权 + 高等教育平等权　；参考：《吉林大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：接受高等教育是社会发展和个人素质提高的重要手段。在高等教育大众化的今天,接受高等教育已经从少数出身好或天赋高或两者兼备的人的特权成为具有一定资格的人的一般权利。我国法律虽然已经将高等教育平等权作为一项法律权利确定下来,但是在其权利实现的过程中依然存在诸多不平等的现象,严重侵犯了权利人,尤其是弱势群体的接受高等教育的权利。因此,有必要建立一种有效的权利保障机制来保证人民接受公平的高等教育。目前,我国学术界对于高等教育领域平等权的研究成果比较丰富。但是主要都集中关注入学机会上的平等,强调给予每个人平等的入学机会,研究范围过于狭窄。高等教育平等权是一项复合权利,覆盖范围广泛,涵盖了学习机会、学习过程、学习结果三方面。所以目前的学术研究不能有效地为保障权利实现提供理论支撑。因此,本文通过对高等教育平等权内涵外延的分析,试图建立一套有效覆盖高等教育领域全过程的平等权利保障机制。本文主体共分为四部分,第一部分对高等教育平等权的内涵进行界定。首先从平等权的一般概念分析,确立“合理依据”和“合理程度”两个判断平等的标准。然后结合高等教育的特点,重点阐述高等教育权的一般特点,表明高等教育领域平等权保障的必要性和紧迫性。最后对现阶段我国关于高等教育领域平等权的法律规定进行梳理。第二部分对于现阶段我国高等教育领域存在的不平等现象进行分析,分别对高等教育起点、高等教育过程、高等教育结果三方面出现的不平等现象进行阐述,例举了一些在实践中出现的不平等现象,使人们具有直观的印象。第三部分着重分析了我国对于高等教育平等权的保障和不足。指出虽然我国对于高等教育领域平等权利保障取得巨大的成绩,但是在法律规范、行政执法、司法救济三方面仍然存在着不足,主要存在立法规范缺失,行政机关缺乏监督,司法救济范围狭小等原因,导致了侵犯权利现象时有发生,但是得到应有的救济却十分困难。第四部分集中探讨如何完善高等教育平等权保障机制,主要从加强立法规范和完善权利救济机制两方面进行考虑。结合具体案例和现实制度,借鉴先进经验,一方面要加强关于高等教育平等权立法保障,完善法律法规。另一方面建立一套以行政教育调解、行政教育申诉、行政教育复议、行政教育诉讼、行政教育赔偿五种机制相互衔接相互配合的权利救济机制。
[Abstract]:Accepting higher education is an important means for the development of society and the improvement of personal quality. In today's higher education popularization, the acceptance of higher education has become the general right of a person with certain qualifications from the privileges of a few people with good or talented or both. The legal rights are determined, but there are still many unequal phenomena in the process of the realization of their rights, which seriously infringe on the rights of the rights holders, especially the disadvantaged groups. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an effective right guarantee mechanism to ensure the people to receive a fair higher education.
At present, the research achievements of the equal rights in the field of higher education are rich in the academic circles of our country. However, the equality of admission opportunities is focused mainly on the equal opportunities for admission to everyone, and the scope of the study is too narrow. The equal right of higher education is a complex right, covering a wide range of learning opportunities and learning process. Three aspects of the study results. So the current academic research can not effectively provide theoretical support for the realization of the realization of rights. Therefore, this paper tries to establish an effective guarantee mechanism for equal rights covering the whole process of higher education through the analysis of the connotation and extension of the equal right of higher education. The main body of this article is divided into four parts, the first part The connotation of the equal right of higher education is defined. First, from the analysis of the general concept of equal rights, the two criteria for equality between "reasonable basis" and "reasonable degree" are established. Then, combining the characteristics of higher education, the general characteristics of the right of higher education are elaborated, which indicates the necessity and urgency of the protection of the right to equality in the field of higher education. Finally, the legal provisions on the right of equality in the field of higher education at the present stage are combed. The second part analyses the unequal phenomena in the higher education field in our country at the present stage, and expounds the inequality in the three aspects of the starting point of higher education, the process of Higher Education and the result of higher education respectively. Some of the unequal phenomena appearing in practice make people have a visual impression. The third part focuses on the analysis of our country's guarantee and deficiency for the equal rights of higher education. Although China has made great achievements in the protection of equal rights in the field of higher education, it still exists in three aspects of legal norms, administrative law enforcement and judicial relief. The fourth part mainly discusses how to improve the protection mechanism of the equal rights of higher education, mainly from the strengthening of the legislative norms and the improvement of the right to improve the rights of the higher education. Two aspects of the relief mechanism are taken into consideration. On the one hand, we should strengthen the legislative guarantee on the equal rights of higher education and improve the laws and regulations. On the other hand, we should establish a set of five mechanisms for administrative education mediation, administrative education appeals, administrative education reconsideration, administrative education litigation, and administrative education compensation. The right relief mechanism which is connected with each other.

【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D921;D922.16

【相似文献】