宪法解释权性质研究
[Abstract]:Constitution is the fundamental law of the country and the "mother law" of various laws and regulations, which determines that the constitution is abstract, general and principled; in addition, the constitution has the highest legal effect in the national legal system, which determines the supreme authority of the constitution, and it must be stable and can not be changed overnight. In order to ensure the implementation of the Constitution, promote its continuous development and maintain its stability, the Constitution must be interpreted. The analysis of the nature of the power of interpretation of the Constitution is of great significance to the effective implementation of the Constitution, the correct understanding of the Constitution and the protection of the authority of the Constitution. In recent years, some cases of infringement of citizens'basic rights have appeared in our country. In these cases, the basic law can not be applied because the basic law is not stipulated in the basic law. At this time, the basic law of constitution is needed. The basic rights of citizens are protected, but in judicial practice, the Constitution does not serve as the direct legal basis for the court to adjudicate cases and has no actual legal effect. The analysis of the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation Power has a far-reaching impact on the implementation and development of the Constitution. However, China has not paid enough attention to the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation Power, and China's Constitutional Interpretation System is far from perfect. This paper analyzes the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation both at home and abroad, analyzes the problems existing in the theory and practice of the power of constitutional interpretation in our country, and puts forward some countermeasures to solve the problems in the light of the relevant experience abroad, in order to benefit the system of constitutional interpretation in our country.
In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into four parts.
The first part is the basic theory of the power of constitutional interpretation.Through the analysis of the basic concepts of the power of constitutional interpretation, people can have a deep understanding of the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in China, redefine the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation, and introduce the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation to the legal application of our constitution. And the further improvement of the constitutional interpretation has certain theoretical significance.
The second part is the introduction of the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries. This part introduces the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries, mainly the horizontal comparison between the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in foreign countries and in China, which arouses people's thinking about the nature of the power of constitutional interpretation in China. The improvement has certain guiding role in reality.
The third part is through the analysis of the existing typical cases, leads to the problems of the right to interpret the Constitution in China and analyzes these problems. Effective relief, and then make people doubt the authority of our legal system, leading to the threat to our legal system.
The fourth part is about the corresponding measures to improve the nature of the Constitutional Interpretation, including the application of the law, the design of the main body and the procedure of the Constitutional Interpretation. The guarantee has an important influence on the stable and harmonious development of our society.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D921
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏健馨;;美国宪法解释制度解析——兼论对中国宪法解释制度的启示[J];天津法学;2011年03期
2 黄娟;;全国人大与其常委会立法权冲突的现实出路[J];求实;2011年07期
3 包金玉;;我国宪法司法化探讨[J];前沿;2011年15期
4 齐冠军;李立强;;防止我国宪法司法化的必要性[J];山西省政法管理干部学院学报;2011年03期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 本报记者李新会;宪法解释是宪法实施的重要保障[N];法制日报;2002年
2 吴酩;香港不适宜马上采取普选[N];人民日报海外版;2004年
3 中国政法大学教授 焦洪昌;宪法的性质[N];人民法院报;2001年
4 本报记者 乐欣;宪法权利不是空中楼阁[N];检察日报;2002年
5 顾元;西方国家的宪法解释机制[N];学习时报;2000年
6 ;把握良好契机 推进法治建设[N];21世纪经济报道;2003年
7 任进;建立宪法诉讼制度 推进宪法规范实施[N];检察日报;2001年
8 本报专稿 艾栎楠;美政治进入少数族裔盛开期[N];世界报;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 赵佩佩;宪法解释权性质研究[D];山西大学;2011年
2 张洁;论宪法解释权的主体[D];吉林大学;2011年
3 田川;我国宪法解释制度问题研究[D];河北大学;2010年
4 党冲;论我国宪法解释制度的完善[D];山西大学;2012年
5 耿紫阳;俄罗斯宪法解释制度研究[D];山东大学;2010年
6 位敏;俄罗斯联邦宪法解释制度研究[D];郑州大学;2012年
7 许傲雪;建立和完善我国的宪法解释制度[D];郑州大学;2007年
8 郝静;宪法解释权比较研究[D];天津师范大学;2008年
9 王玉荣;我国违宪审查制度的现状及完善[D];内蒙古大学;2012年
10 张红利;论我国宪法私有财产权保护的发展与完善[D];中央民族大学;2010年
,本文编号:2219201
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xianfalw/2219201.html