行政处罚程序司法化研究

发布时间：2019-06-26 21:59

【摘要】：随着社会法治文明的进步和发展,以行政强权为主要特征的行政处罚行为已越来越暴露出权力与权利的冲突性弊端,如行政处罚告知程序不完善、行政处罚的证据性依据不规范、行政相对人缺少应有的救济程序等,这些都加大着人们与政府之间的矛盾,在这样的情况下,无论行政主体还是行政相对人都越来越要求和愿意强化行政处罚的程序性,将司法的程序规范纳入到行政行政处罚当中,以规范行政处罚程序中政府与人们之间权力与权利的平等性与公平性。我国行政处罚程序的司法化,一方面规范了行政主体行政处罚权的程序运用,另一方面加强了行政处罚程序中人们合法权益的保障,且顺应了国际上关于行政处罚规范的总体发展趋势,对于我国行政法治的不断完善来说具有促进性的内在价值和意义。笔者就是想通过对行政处罚程序在运行过程中的现实分析,找出其所体现出来的种种缺陷弊端,并结合时代背景找出其弊端存在的原因,并通过比较目前世界行政处罚程序的司法化趋势,提出符合我国国情与发展实际并能有效解决行政处罚程序运行过程中所暴露出的种种弊病的合理性建议,从而走出一条适属于我国发展实际的行政处罚程序司法化道路。本文笔者通过对我国行政处罚程序司法化的可行性分析,从尝试律师介入行政处罚程序制度、完善行政处罚程序中的告知制度、规范行政处罚程序中的证据制度、统一并规范行政处罚中的听证程序制度的适用、健全行政处罚过程中行政相对人有效的救济途径等多个方面提出我国行政处罚程序司法化的可行性建议。尤其是在行政相对人的救济途径中提到增加行政处罚中行政复议制度的有效性、加大行政处罚中行政诉讼制度的审判中立性、严格对错误及不当行政处罚的赔偿或补偿责任等方面对行政相对人的合法权益的权力性侵害提出更加具体化的建议性救济措施,以从具体可行的角度提议出发促进我国的行政处罚程序司法化道路改革的步代。
[Abstract]:With the progress and development of social civilization ruled by law, the behavior of administrative punishment characterized by administrative power has more and more exposed the conflict of power and right, such as the imperfect procedure of informing administrative punishment, the irregular evidence basis of administrative punishment, the lack of due relief procedures of administrative counterpart, and so on, which all increase the contradiction between people and the government. Both the administrative subject and the administrative counterpart are more and more demanding and willing to strengthen the procedure of administrative punishment, and bring the judicial procedural norms into the administrative punishment in order to standardize the equality and fairness of power and rights between the government and people in the administrative punishment procedure. The judicialization of administrative punishment procedure in our country, on the one hand, standardizes the procedural application of administrative punishment power of administrative subject, on the other hand, strengthens the protection of people's legitimate rights and interests in administrative punishment procedure, and conforms to the overall development trend of administrative punishment norm in the world, which is of intrinsic value and significance for the continuous improvement of administrative rule of law in our country. The author wants to find out all kinds of defects and malpractices embodied in the administrative punishment procedure through the realistic analysis of the operation process of the administrative punishment procedure, and find out the causes of its malpractice combined with the background of the times, and by comparing the judicialization trend of the administrative punishment procedure in the world at present, puts forward some reasonable suggestions that accord with the national conditions and development reality of our country and can effectively solve the various disadvantages exposed in the course of the operation of the administrative punishment procedure. Therefore, it is suitable for the judicial road of administrative punishment procedure, which belongs to the actual development of our country. Through the feasibility analysis of the judicialization of the administrative punishment procedure in our country, the author tries to intervene in the administrative punishment procedure system, perfect the notification system in the administrative punishment procedure, standardize the evidence system in the administrative punishment procedure, unify and standardize the application of the hearing procedure system in the administrative punishment. The feasible suggestions on the judicialization of administrative punishment procedure in our country are put forward from many aspects, such as perfecting the effective relief way of administrative counterpart in the process of administrative punishment. In particular, in the relief channels of the administrative counterpart, it is mentioned to increase the effectiveness of the administrative reconsideration system in the administrative punishment, to increase the trial neutrality of the administrative litigation system in the administrative punishment, and to strictly put forward more concrete remedial measures for the infringement of the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart in the aspects of compensation or compensation liability for the wrong and improper administrative punishment. From the specific and feasible point of view, it is proposed to promote the reform of the judicial road of administrative punishment procedure in our country.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.1

【相似文献】