基于PV-GPG模型的县级政府绩效评价流程研究

发布时间：2018-03-05 09:49

本文选题：评价流程　切入点：政府绩效　出处：《兰州大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：县级政府是事实上的基层政府,是区域发展的实际中心,但缺乏政府绩效评价的流程方面的理论指导；政府绩效评价是政治性与技术性都很强的工作,是价值理性与工具理性的结合,但是缺失对公共价值的回应；PV-GPG理论是对新公共管理在公共价值的缺陷进行反思基础上的创新,有着很强的矫正功能和指导意义,但缺乏在实践中的“操作化”指南。因此,本研究以县级政府为视角,来研究PV-GPG框架下政府绩效评价的流程,将推动该科学模型在县级政府绩效评价中的实际应用,也更有推广的意义。本研究的目标在于,将PV-GPG模型进行分解、重构和具体化,针对不同类型的公共行政过程,构建一个(组)流程体系,这些流程体系能够承载、体现并保障公共价值。首先,在理论上区分了PV-GPG框架下的评价流程与传统评价流程在管理要素、管理职能和评价功能方面的变化,按照“价值链”思想,将政府绩效评价前的功能定位于“公共价值的获取与平衡”,评价中定位于“价值的承载与输出”,评价后定位于“价值的反馈与重塑”。其次,分别界定流程中每个环节的功能和作用、流程中每个主体的诉求和价值取向,根据环节功能与主体价值的契合匹配,将环节与主体进行嵌套,把最合适的主体放置到相应的流程环节中,从而设计出了基于PV-GPG思想的通用评价流程,并建立了政府绩效评价的共享数据库和流程管理系统。再次,根据不同基础模型在组织者、评价者以及评价功能等方面的差异,在通用流程的基础上设计出六种有特定功能的系列流程。最后,撷取了16个县级政府绩效评价的案例,以基础模型为视角进行比较分析,发现了有关价值建构、多模型运用与动力机制的有益启示。本研究的创新点：以“县级政府”为立足点设计流程、将公共价值植入评价流程之中、建立了政府绩效评价的流程管理系统、区分了通用流程与特定功能的系列流程。下一步研究的方向在于案例的进一步剖析和流程的进一步细化。
[Abstract]:County level government is the actual center of regional development, but it lacks theoretical guidance on the process of government performance evaluation, and government performance evaluation is both political and technical work. It is the combination of value rationality and instrumental rationality, but the lack of response to public value is an innovation on the basis of reflection on the defects of public value in the new public management, which has a strong corrective function and guiding significance. However, there is a lack of "operationalization" guide in practice. Therefore, this study studies the process of government performance evaluation under the framework of PV-GPG from the perspective of county-level government, which will promote the practical application of the scientific model in the performance evaluation of county-level government. Also has the promotion significance. The goal of this study is to decompose, reconstruct and concretize the PV-GPG model, and construct a process system (group) for different types of public administration processes, which can carry, embody and protect public value. The paper theoretically distinguishes between the evaluation process under the PV-GPG framework and the traditional evaluation process in terms of management elements, management functions and evaluation functions, according to the idea of "value chain". The function of government performance evaluation is defined as "the acquisition and balance of public value", "the bearing and output of value" in evaluation, and "feedback and remolding of value" after evaluation. The function and function of each link in the process are defined, and the demand and value orientation of each subject in the process are defined respectively. According to the matching between the function of the link and the value of the subject, the link and the subject are nested. Put the most suitable subject into the corresponding process, and then design the general evaluation process based on PV-GPG, and set up the shared database and process management system of government performance evaluation. According to the differences of different basic models in organizers, evaluators and evaluation functions, six series of processes with specific functions are designed on the basis of general process. Finally, 16 cases of performance evaluation of county government are selected. Through comparative analysis from the perspective of basic model, some useful revelations about value construction, multi-model application and dynamic mechanism are found. The innovation point of this research: to design the process of "county government" as the foothold, put the public value into the evaluation process, and establish the process management system of government performance evaluation. The next step is to further analyze the case and further refine the flow.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D630

【参考文献】