从政策网络到网络化治理:一组概念辨析

发布时间：2018-03-13 05:35

本文选题：社会网络　切入点：政策网络　出处：《北京行政学院学报》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：社会科学领域与网络有关的概念有多个,极易引起混淆。国外的研究主要沿着两条相对独立的路径演进,分别是政策网络和网络化治理。前者起源于美国发展于欧洲,后分化为利益调和和治理两大学派;后者则以美国的研究为主,在工商管理和公共管理领域都有所发展。国内与网络有关的概念使用频率较高的有社会网络、政策网络、政策网络治理、网络治理和网络化治理等。其中社会网络引入最早,主要被社会学领域的学者所关注;政策网络和政策网络治理与西方政策网络研究的两大学派相对应;网络治理与网络化治理的使用主要与翻译、学术传承以及使用习惯有关,但每个概念皆有三重来源。西方两条研究路径都涉及治理,而两种治理的内涵有明显区别,主要体现在运行机理、价值标准、主要问题以及政府的角色定位四个方面。
[Abstract]:There are many concepts related to the network in the field of social sciences, which is easy to cause confusion. Foreign studies have mainly evolved along two relatively independent paths, namely, policy networks and networked governance. The former originated in the United States and developed in Europe. The latter has developed into two major schools of interest reconciliation and governance; the latter has developed in the fields of business administration and public administration, mainly in the United States. Social networks and policy networks are among the most frequently used concepts related to networks in China. Policy network governance, network governance and network governance, among which social network was introduced the earliest, mainly concerned by scholars in the field of sociology, the policy network and policy network governance correspond to the two schools of western policy network research. The use of network governance and network governance is mainly related to translation, academic heritage and usage habits, but each concept has three sources. Mainly reflected in the operating mechanism, value standards, the main problems and the role of the government in four aspects.
【作者单位】：山东科技大学文法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(15AGL017) 山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(YF44)
【分类号】：D035

【相似文献】