论合作治理实践模式的构建

发布时间：2018-04-06 03:16

本文选题：合作治理　切入点：模式构建　出处：《中共江苏省委党校》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：合作治理思想是总结反思公共管理的统治逻辑和市场化运动的产物。伴随着新公共管理弊端的出现,人们渴望寻求一种既强调民主体制下政府责任,又保留新公共管理运动思想中引入市场、社会力量,克服政府全面控制公共服务的弊端的理论。治理理论可以说满足了这种需求,并使之成为近二十年来公共管理领域的理论和实践的热点。论文主要以合作治理的基本理论观点为基础,以裁量权的配置为模式类型化的维度,从实践中寻找符合合作治理内涵及不同模式的典型案例,如购买服务案例苏州公共自行车,自主治理的淠史杭灌区农村自主灌溉及洛杉矶公共河流治理的中西案例对比,特许经营的四川碧峰峡景区及芝加哥千禧公园案例对比,将成功与失败案例比较,在中西方差异背景下的对比并总结我国的成功经验。提炼合作治理案例中的模式特征,并对三种合作治理模式进行总结对比,旨在从模式结构中提炼制度化因素,帮助合作治理实施者深入理解特定合作治理模式的内在机理以及与所处条件的匹配性,有利于提升实践应用的有效性。论文除绪论外,在结构上可分为五章。第一章为合作治理实践模式研究的学理依据,作者在大量查阅相关文献资料之后,对国内外有关合作治理的内涵进行梳理并将其作为案例选择的标准。从学理性分析运用案例研究合作治理模式的合理性,主要从制度化为逻辑基础出发。最后以裁量权分配的维度将合作治理模式类型化,为后文细致讨论做理论基础。第二章到第四章,以裁量的谱系为衡量标准将合作治理模式类型化,分为政府购买模式、自主治理模式和特许经营模式。实践中仍存其他模式,模式具有可复制性,仅是表达部分事务的特征。这里通过一个案例梳理,或是两个中西方案例的对比,从构建模式的5个维度进行分析说明,具有一定的特殊性又同时将其上升为普适性的工具。第五章,结论部分。将三个模式进行整理对比,每个模式都有其运用的地方,有他的优势和劣势。一个好的模式并不一定都适用所有,明确模式的运用范围并将它合理运用才是本文的意义所在。特别提出合作的代价是裁量权让渡,让政府与社会力量、私营企业共享权力与控制尽可能的实现。本文力图将合作治理研究引向以制度化为目标的应用,对准备应用某种理论进行制度化的管理者来说,基于制度化要素及相关因素选择某类模式是很有必要的。对具体实施者来说,在考虑时空下所有限制条件,从成功实践中提炼的合作治理模式更具有个别微观操作性和普适性。
[Abstract]:Co governance thinking is a product of summary and Reflection on the public management logic of domination and market movement. With the emergence of new public management problems, people are eager to seek a kind of not only emphasize the responsibility of the government under the democratic system, and keep social forces in the movement of new public management ideas into the market, overcome the drawbacks of full government control of public service theory the theory of governance. It can be said to meet this demand, and make it become the focus of theory and practice in the field of public administration in recent twenty years. This thesis is mainly based on the basic theory of cooperative governance, to the discretion of the configuration for the type of model dimension, looking for a typical case of cooperative governance connotation and different modes in practice, such as the purchase of Suzhou public bicycle service case management, self governance of Pishihang Irrigation Area in Losangeles River irrigation and rural autonomous public and on the case Than, the franchise Sichuan Bifengxia scenic area and the Chicago Millennium Park case comparison, success and failure cases, in contrast to Western differences in background and summarized the successful experience of our country. In the case of cooperative governance pattern extraction, and three kinds of cooperative governance mode summary comparison, to refine the system the factors from the model structure, the internal mechanism of cooperative governance help implementers understand specific cooperative governance model and matching with the conditions, is conducive to enhancing the effectiveness of the practical application of the paper. In addition to the introduction, in the structure can be divided into five chapters. The first chapter is theoretical basis for the study of practical mode of governance cooperation, after consulting a large number of related literature at home and abroad, the connotation of cooperative governance and sort out as the case selection criteria. From the theoretical analysis with case studies on Cooperative Governance The rationality of model, starting from the systematic logic foundation. Finally to the discretion of the distribution of dimension of cooperation governance model type, for the detailed theoretical foundation. The second chapter to the fourth chapter, the discretion of the lineage as the standard will cooperate governance model type, divided into the mode of government purchase and the self governance model and franchise mode. Other modes are still in practice, model can be replicated, is only part of the transaction. This feature expression through a case review, or comparison of Chinese and western two cases, that were analyzed from 5 dimensions of construction mode, has a certain particularity and at the same time will it rise to the universal tool. The fifth chapter is the conclusion. The three mode sorting comparison, each mode has its usage, has his advantages and disadvantages. A good model may not be suitable for all, A clear pattern using scope and reasonable use of it is the meaning of this article. Especially put forward cooperation is the price discretion to transfer, government and social forces, private enterprises sharing power and control as far as possible to achieve application. This paper tries to research into the cooperative governance institution as the goal, to prepare the application of some theories of institutional managers, based on the institutional factor and the related factors of a class of models is very necessary. In the concrete implementation, considering all time constraints, derived from the successful practice of the cooperative governance model has more individual micro operation and universality.

【学位授予单位】：中共江苏省委党校
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630

【相似文献】