公共行政社会化与行政诉讼受案范围的重构

发布时间：2018-08-01 21:11

【摘要】：受案范围是行政诉讼制度的基础。自从行政诉讼制度设立以来,在法学理论和司法实务界关于行政诉讼受案范围的讨论就一直没有停息。现行《行政诉讼法》中受案范围等诸多条款已经显露出结构性弊端和深层次矛盾,这些弊端仅凭司法解释已经无法彻底解决。因此我们必须正视当下公共行政社会化给行政诉讼受案范围带来的新变化,对当前的研究方法进行反思,理解当下的行政诉讼的困境及其原因；进而寻求-种综合性的分析视角,明确行政诉讼要以解决行政争议为目标,提出以“行政争议”作为行政诉讼受案范围标准,以“肯定概括加负面排除”的立法方式科学设置行政诉讼受案范围的具体标准。适当放宽行政诉讼的原告资格,明确社会组织承担公共管理行为的可诉性的具体立法建议,以此来重构行政诉讼受案范围。全文分为导论、正文和结语三个部分。文章的主要内容如下：导论部分介绍了论文选题的背景意义、文献综述及研究方法和创新等情况。第一章是问题的缘起——公共行政社会化引发的新课题。从公共行政发展变化的背景入手,分别介绍了公共行政的概念特征以及公共行政社会化的内涵与形态。第二章行政诉讼受案范围的现状考察,分别分析了行政诉讼受案范围的立法现状、行政诉讼原告资格和被告资格的立法规定。第三章重点分析了公共行政社会化对行政诉讼受案范围的影响,主要体现在行政诉讼受案范围的狭窄、行政主体的多元化、行政诉讼被告资格拓展、非强制性行政行为的救济瓶颈等方面。第四章主要阐述了行政诉讼受案范围的重构问题。以公共行政社会化的背景为出发点,对行政诉讼受案范围的域外经验进行了考察,提出了行政诉讼观念更新的观点,并明确指出行政诉讼要以解决行政争议为目标。行政诉讼受案范围的重构,要借助《行政诉讼法》修改的良好契机,以“行政争议”作为行政诉讼受案范围标准,采取“肯定概括加负面排除”立法标准,同时要注重适当放宽行政诉讼原告资格,还要以立法的方式明确社会组织行使公共行政职能行为的可诉性。结语部分提出,在公共行政发展对行政诉讼制度带来挑战的背景下,关于行政诉讼受案范围的研究应当利用《行政诉讼法》修改的历史机遇,以完善行政诉讼受案范围研究为重要支撑点,推动起行政诉讼前行的车轮,勾勒出行政诉讼发展的清晰轨迹。
[Abstract]:The scope of accepting a case is the basis of the administrative litigation system. Since the establishment of the administrative litigation system, the discussion on the scope of accepting cases in the field of law theory and judicial practice has never stopped. Many articles in the current Administrative procedure Law, such as the scope of accepting cases, have revealed structural defects and deep-seated contradictions, which cannot be solved thoroughly by judicial interpretation alone. Therefore, we must face up to the new changes brought by the socialization of public administration to the scope of administrative litigation, reflect on the current research methods, and understand the predicament and reasons of the current administrative litigation. Then it is clear that administrative litigation should be aimed at resolving administrative disputes, and that "administrative disputes" should be regarded as the standard of accepting cases in administrative litigation. By the way of "positive generalization plus negative exclusion", the specific standard of accepting cases in administrative litigation should be set scientifically. In order to reconstruct the scope of administrative litigation, it is necessary to relax the plaintiff's qualification of administrative litigation and make clear the specific legislative suggestions that social organizations should undertake the actionable nature of public administration behavior in order to reconstruct the scope of administrative litigation cases. The full text is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The main contents are as follows: the introduction introduces the background significance, literature review, research methods and innovations. The first chapter is the origin of the problem-the new topic caused by the socialization of public administration. Starting with the background of the development and change of public administration, this paper introduces the concept characteristics of public administration and the connotation and form of socialization of public administration. The second chapter examines the current situation of the scope of administrative litigation cases, respectively analyzes the scope of administrative litigation cases of legislative status, administrative litigation plaintiff qualification and defendant qualification legislative provisions. The third chapter focuses on the analysis of the impact of public administration socialization on the scope of administrative litigation cases, mainly reflected in the narrow scope of administrative litigation cases, the diversification of administrative subjects, and the expansion of administrative litigation defendants' qualifications. The remedy bottleneck of non-compulsory administrative act. The fourth chapter mainly expounds the reconstruction of the scope of administrative litigation cases. Taking the background of the socialization of public administration as the starting point, this paper investigates the extra-territorial experience of accepting cases in administrative litigation, puts forward the point of view of renewing the concept of administrative litigation, and points out clearly that administrative litigation should be aimed at resolving administrative disputes. In order to reconstruct the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation, we should make use of the good opportunity of revising the Administrative procedure Law, take "administrative dispute" as the standard of accepting cases in administrative litigation, and adopt the legislative standard of "positive generalization plus negative exclusion". At the same time, we should pay attention to relaxing the plaintiff's qualification of administrative litigation and make clear by legislation the actionable nature of social organization's action of public administrative function. The conclusion points out that under the background that the development of public administration brings challenges to the administrative litigation system, the research on the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation should take advantage of the historical opportunity of revising the Administrative procedure Law. In order to improve the scope of administrative litigation cases as an important supporting point, promote the wheel of administrative litigation, draw a clear track of the development of administrative litigation.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】