微博问政的困境及制度化路径研究
发布时间：2019-04-16 18:21
【摘要】：2006年10月,中共中央编译局副局长俞可平提出“民主是个好东西”!时至2011年“中国政务微博元年”,人们认识到“微博是个好东西”,它不反可以娱乐大众,还可以在某种程度上改变中国的公共政策格局。从2011年起,中国公民开始利用微博问政来重新界定公共政策与政府管理的理念。公民利用微博问政来介入公共事务、参与政策制定、监督官员行为、表达利益诉求,同时各级政府机构及公务人员开设微博,与民互动、了解民情、荟萃民智、抨击腐败、转变作风。官民在微博这一平台良性互动,使得公民看到政府实现科学、民主执政的希望。“微博反腐”的偶然成功,也给公民带来了意外惊喜,得到各个阶层尤其是处于社会底层公民的追捧。然而,微博作为一种社交手段,其商业化与娱乐化的属性,使得微博问政面临不良信息传播、非理性情绪宣泄、网民道德自律缺失等问题困扰。本文着从完善制度建设这一视角,探讨突破微博问政困境的路径。 本文以公共管理、公民参与的相关理论为支撑,结合我国当前微博问政的现状及具体困境,对微博问政与政务微博的作用机理进行深入剖析,并借鉴可行经验,以制度化路径做为切入点,提出了突破微博问政困境的制度化策略。围绕这一思路,本文在结构上分为五部分,首先在绪论中简要介绍了选题的背景,意义,研究现状及方法,在第一章中,笔者对微博问政进行一般分析,利用文献及网络术语对微博问政的概念及功能类型进行界定,为下一步研究奠定基础。笔者选取2011年3月至2013年12月期间,微博问政的典型案例,将其归纳总结为五种类型,并从促民主、维民权、赢民心、逼官廉四个方面阐述微博问政的现实意义；第二章对微博问政的困境进行了系统阐述,包括微博问政大众性与专业性的困境,自由表达与非理性表达的困境,微博问政主体话语权不平等的困境以及政府在应对微博问政过程中应对不足与反应过度的困境,线上交流与线下执行脱节的困境。文章认为,微博问政之所以会陷入困境,与微博自身的缺陷密切相关,然而,更深层次的原因应该是公民表达渠道不畅与政府监管不力,缺乏长效机制造成的。关于这几点,学者们或多或少提出过一些对策,故笔者不再赘述,也不需要再提及网民的道德素养与官员的新闻业务素养,而把焦点直接切入相关制度建设,以期能与相关研究一道为微博问政的良性发展贡献绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:In October 2006, Yu Keping, deputy director of the Central Bureau of compilation and compilation of the CPC Central Committee, proposed "democracy is a good thing"! In 2011, "the first year of China's Government Weibo", people recognized that "Weibo is a good thing", it can not only entertain the public, but also to some extent change the pattern of public policy in China. Since 2011, Chinese citizens have used Weibo politics to redefine public policy and government management. Citizens use Weibo to engage in public affairs, participate in policy formulation, supervise officials' behavior, express interest claims, and at the same time set up Weibo at all levels of government agencies and public servants to interact with the people, understand the situation of the people, gather the wisdom of the people, and attack corruption. Change the style. The benign interaction between the government and the people on the Weibo platform makes the citizens see the hope of the government to realize the science and democracy. The accidental success of "Weibo anti-corruption" has also brought an unexpected surprise to citizens, and has been pursued by all classes, especially those at the bottom of the society. However, as a kind of social means, the commercialization and entertainment of Weibo make Weibo face some problems such as bad information dissemination, irrational emotion catharsis and the lack of moral self-discipline of netizens. This article discusses the way to break through Weibo's dilemma of asking for politics from the perspective of perfecting the system construction. Based on the relevant theories of public administration and citizen participation, this paper, combined with the current situation and specific predicament of Weibo in China, makes a deep analysis of the action mechanism of Weibo and government affairs Weibo, and draws lessons from feasible experiences. Taking the institutionalized path as the starting point, this paper puts forward an institutionalized strategy to break through Weibo's dilemma of asking for politics. Around this train of thought, this paper is divided into five parts in structure. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the background, significance, research status and methods of the topic in the introduction. In the first chapter, the author carries on the general analysis to the Weibo question politics. This paper defines the concept and function types of Weibo politics by using literature and network terminology, which lays a foundation for further research. From March 2011 to December 2013, the author selects the typical cases of Weibo's political inquiry, summarizes it into five types, and expounds the practical significance of Weibo's political inquiry from four aspects: promoting democracy, safeguarding civil rights, winning the hearts of the people and forcing the government to be honest. The second chapter makes a systematic exposition of the dilemma of Weibo's political inquiry, including the plight of the mass and professionalism of Weibo's political inquiry, the dilemma of free expression and irrational expression, and the difficulties of free expression and irrational expression. The dilemma of unequal discourse power of Weibo subjects and the dilemma of inadequate and over-reaction of the government in the process of dealing with Weibo administration, and the disconnect between online communication and offline execution. The paper holds that the reason why Weibo is in a difficult position is closely related to the defects of Weibo itself. However, the deeper reason is that the poor channels of expression of citizens and the lack of government supervision and the lack of a long-term mechanism are the reasons for this. On these points, scholars have more or less put forward some countermeasures, so the author does not repeat, nor does it need to mention the moral literacy of netizens and the quality of news business of officials, but to focus directly on the relevant system construction. In order to contribute to the benign development of Weibo governance together with related research.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D630;G206.2
[Abstract]:In October 2006, Yu Keping, deputy director of the Central Bureau of compilation and compilation of the CPC Central Committee, proposed "democracy is a good thing"! In 2011, "the first year of China's Government Weibo", people recognized that "Weibo is a good thing", it can not only entertain the public, but also to some extent change the pattern of public policy in China. Since 2011, Chinese citizens have used Weibo politics to redefine public policy and government management. Citizens use Weibo to engage in public affairs, participate in policy formulation, supervise officials' behavior, express interest claims, and at the same time set up Weibo at all levels of government agencies and public servants to interact with the people, understand the situation of the people, gather the wisdom of the people, and attack corruption. Change the style. The benign interaction between the government and the people on the Weibo platform makes the citizens see the hope of the government to realize the science and democracy. The accidental success of "Weibo anti-corruption" has also brought an unexpected surprise to citizens, and has been pursued by all classes, especially those at the bottom of the society. However, as a kind of social means, the commercialization and entertainment of Weibo make Weibo face some problems such as bad information dissemination, irrational emotion catharsis and the lack of moral self-discipline of netizens. This article discusses the way to break through Weibo's dilemma of asking for politics from the perspective of perfecting the system construction. Based on the relevant theories of public administration and citizen participation, this paper, combined with the current situation and specific predicament of Weibo in China, makes a deep analysis of the action mechanism of Weibo and government affairs Weibo, and draws lessons from feasible experiences. Taking the institutionalized path as the starting point, this paper puts forward an institutionalized strategy to break through Weibo's dilemma of asking for politics. Around this train of thought, this paper is divided into five parts in structure. Firstly, this paper briefly introduces the background, significance, research status and methods of the topic in the introduction. In the first chapter, the author carries on the general analysis to the Weibo question politics. This paper defines the concept and function types of Weibo politics by using literature and network terminology, which lays a foundation for further research. From March 2011 to December 2013, the author selects the typical cases of Weibo's political inquiry, summarizes it into five types, and expounds the practical significance of Weibo's political inquiry from four aspects: promoting democracy, safeguarding civil rights, winning the hearts of the people and forcing the government to be honest. The second chapter makes a systematic exposition of the dilemma of Weibo's political inquiry, including the plight of the mass and professionalism of Weibo's political inquiry, the dilemma of free expression and irrational expression, and the difficulties of free expression and irrational expression. The dilemma of unequal discourse power of Weibo subjects and the dilemma of inadequate and over-reaction of the government in the process of dealing with Weibo administration, and the disconnect between online communication and offline execution. The paper holds that the reason why Weibo is in a difficult position is closely related to the defects of Weibo itself. However, the deeper reason is that the poor channels of expression of citizens and the lack of government supervision and the lack of a long-term mechanism are the reasons for this. On these points, scholars have more or less put forward some countermeasures, so the author does not repeat, nor does it need to mention the moral literacy of netizens and the quality of news business of officials, but to focus directly on the relevant system construction. In order to contribute to the benign development of Weibo governance together with related research.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D630;G206.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈红玉;;由突发事件看微博的传播机制[J];传媒观察;2010年08期
2 王鼎云;;对微博的发展状况和趋势的冷思考[J];时代教育(教育教学);2011年01期
3 秦前红;李少文;;微博问政的规范化保护需求——基于社会管理体制创新的视角[J];东方法学;2011年04期
4 许蓉佳;;网络群体性事件与政府舆情引导能力建设[J];党政干部学刊;2010年07期
5 张佰明;;嵌套性:网络微博发展的根本逻辑[J];国际新闻界;2010年06期
6 郭文婧;;微博参与公共事务需积极导引[J];资源与人居环境;2011年03期
7 杨宪福;;网络问政的发展状况与应对措施[J];广西社会主义学院学报;2010年03期
8 毛寿龙;;网络的政治影响[J];党政论坛(干部文摘);2007年11期
9 李萌;;网络问政与参政的新态势[J];互联网天地;2010年03期
10 樊夏;青木;曹R，
本文编号：2458992
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2458992.html
