当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 绩效管理论文 >

地方法治的绩效及其评价机制初探

发布时间:2018-03-08 01:02

  本文选题:地方法治 切入点:绩效评价 出处:《学术界》2017年08期  论文类型:期刊论文


【摘要】:全面依法治国是国家治理现代化的必然要求。基于地方立法权扩容、地方法治竞争与其评价失范的背景,提出对地方法治的绩效及其评价机制进行研究。地方法治的绩效包括地方法治建设成效和地方法治的经济社会效益两层内涵,前者旨在提升地方乃至国家法治水平,后者旨在增强法治维护公共秩序、推动经济社会进步及人类自身发展的效能。地方法治的绩效评价研究内容:一是价值导向,即提倡一种"绩效型法治"理想,其本质为法治与绩效两套价值体系与实践要求的权衡及整合;二是评价内容,具体由地方立法、行政、司法与守法各环节绩效组成;三是评价机制,包括评价指标体系、组织模式、问责程序等。该项研究的重要意义:一是超越传统法治评估的功能,定位于民主范畴,服务于地方法治的公信力提升;二是提供法治中国建设的类型理想,即法治追求公平正义的同时也讲究经济效率;三是发挥评价技术理性,以评促改,针对性地提高地方法治绩效。
[Abstract]:General rule of law is the inevitable requirement of modern governance. Based on the expansion of the local legislative power, local law and competition evaluation anomie background, proposed the performance of local law and its evaluation mechanism is studied. The performance of the local law including local law construction achievements and to cure the economic and social benefits of the connotation of the two level, the former is to enhance the local and the level of rule of law, which aims to enhance the rule of law to maintain public order, to promote economic and social progress and human development performance. Research on the performance evaluation of the content of the local law: one is the value orientation, namely advocating a "performance rule", its essence is the rule of law and the performance of the two set of value system and practical requirements of balance and integration; two is to evaluate the content, specifically by the local legislative, administrative, judicial and law-abiding composition performance of each link; three is the evaluation mechanism, including evaluation index system, group Weave pattern, accountability procedures and so on. The important significance of the study: one is to go beyond the traditional law evaluation function, positioning in the Democratic category, enhance the credibility of service to the local rule of law; two is to provide the rule of law China construction type of ideal, namely the rule of law the pursuit of fairness and justice but also pay attention to economic efficiency; the three is to play the evaluation technology rational assessment and reform, to improve the performance of local law.

【作者单位】: 华南理工大学法学院;
【基金】:华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(2017XBS08) 中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题[CLS(2016)C02]阶段性成果
【分类号】:D927

【相似文献】

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 路平;绩效考核需解决的几块“短板”[N];中国劳动保障报;2008年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 王永刚;我国政府绩效评估法律制度研究[D];东北大学;2010年



本文编号:1581711

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/1581711.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fbf24***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com