选举拟或协商：我国地方党政官员的民主认知

发布时间：2018-03-16 16:36

本文选题：协商民主　切入点：选举民主　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：处理好选举民主与协商民主之间的关系是当前我国政治民主化建设中的焦点问题,也是影响我国民主政治发展未来的关键问题。这其中,地方党政官员对于两种民主形式地位与关系的态度尚未得到关注。地方党政官员是中央各项方针和政策的主要执行者,是直面管理与服务对象的重要管理者,同时也是我国社会治理的核心力量。他们对两种民主形式地位与关系的认知无疑深刻影响中央层面政策在地方与基层的贯彻与执行,进而影响我国民主政治建设在地方层面取得全面进展。因此,有必要对这一问题予以必要的研究。本文主要关注于我国地方党政官员对于两种民主形式地位与关系的认知状况以及造成民主认知差异的主要因素。为得出研究结论,本文借助已有调查数据,综合采用文献研究法与量化研究法开展研究。在研究过程中,以已有文献研究为基础设计分析框架并提出如下研究假设,假设1:将选举理解为民主本质的地方党政官员更倾向于认为选举民主更为重要;假设2:对协商实践绩效评价更高的地方党政官员更倾向于认为协商民主更为重要;假设3:对协商实践满意度更高的地方党政官员更倾向于认为协商民主更为重要;假设4:"权威"接受度更高的党政官员更加认同于协商民主与选举民主在我国具有相同重要的地位。随后,本文通过描述性统计分析以及相关性检验,对我国地方党政官员对于两种民主形式地位与关系的认知及造成认知差异的影响因素进行了探讨,验证了假设1、假设2、假设3,并发现性别因素对于地方党政官员的民主认知会也造成一定影响。根据以上分析与检验过程,本论文得出如下研究结论,地方党政官员普遍认同于选举与协商均是我国民主制度的重要内容,但就两种民主形式谁更重要存在观点差异。选举民主与协商民主在我国民主政治建设中处于同样重要的地位成为官员态度中的主流;持有选举民主观(认同选举是民主的本质)的地方党政官员更加倾向于认为选举民主更加重要;对协商民主实践绩效评价更高或者满意度更高的地方党政官员更加倾向于认为协商民主更加重要;女性地方党政官员对于协商民主与选举民主在我国民主政治建设中处于相同重要的地位有更高的认同度。最后,结合以上结论,本论文提出了推进协商民主与选举民主在我国民主政治建设中协调发展的现实策略:确立中国特色民主观;改进民主观念宣教工作方法;完善民主制度体系并规范运作机制;注重对女性官员群体民主潜能的开发;形成统一的民主发展路线共识。
[Abstract]:Properly handling the relationship between electoral democracy and deliberative democracy is a focus issue in the construction of political democratization in our country, and also a key issue affecting the future development of democratic politics in our country. The attitude of local party and government officials on the status and relationship between the two forms of democracy has not yet been paid attention to. Local party and government officials are the main executors of various policies and policies of the central government, as well as the important managers who face up to the targets of management and service. At the same time, they are also the core forces of social governance in our country. Their understanding of the status and relationship of the two forms of democracy undoubtedly profoundly affects the implementation and implementation of policies at the central level at the local and grass-roots levels. Thus affecting the overall progress in the construction of democratic politics in our country at the local level. It is necessary to make a necessary study on this issue. This paper mainly focuses on the cognition of local party and government officials about the status and relationship of the two forms of democracy and the main factors that cause the difference of democratic cognition. In this paper, the literature research method and the quantitative research method are used to carry out the research with the help of the existing survey data. In the course of the research, the analytical framework is designed based on the existing literature research and the following research hypotheses are put forward. Assumption 1: local party and government officials who regard election as the essence of democracy tend to think that electoral democracy is more important, hypothesis 2: local party and government officials with higher performance evaluation of consultation practice tend to think that consultative democracy is more important; Hypothesis 3: local party and government officials with higher satisfaction with consultation practice tend to think that consultative democracy is more important; Hypothesis 4: party and government officials with higher acceptance of "authority" agree that deliberative democracy and electoral democracy have the same important status in our country. Subsequently, through descriptive statistical analysis and correlation test, This paper probes into the cognition of the status and relationship between the two forms of democracy among local party and government officials in China and the factors influencing the cognitive differences. Hypothesis 1, hypothesis 2, hypothesis 3, and it is found that gender factors also affect the democratic cognition of local party and government officials. Based on the above analysis and test process, this paper draws the following conclusions. Local party and government officials generally agree that elections and consultations are important contents of our democratic system. However, there are differences of views on who is more important in the two forms of democracy. Electoral democracy and consultative democracy have become the mainstream of the attitude of officials in the construction of democratic politics in our country in the same important position; Local party and government officials who hold the view of electoral democracy (who agree that election is the essence of democracy) tend to think that electoral democracy is more important; Local party and government officials with higher performance evaluation or higher satisfaction degree tend to think that consultative democracy is more important; Women local party and government officials have a higher degree of recognition of the equal importance of deliberative democracy and electoral democracy in the construction of democratic politics in China. Finally, combined with the above conclusions, This paper puts forward the realistic strategies to promote the harmonious development of the deliberative democracy and the electoral democracy in the democratic political construction of our country: to establish the democratic view with Chinese characteristics, to improve the methods of propaganda and education of the democratic concept, to perfect the democratic system and to standardize the operating mechanism; Pay attention to the development of democratic potential of female officials group and form a unified consensus of democratic development line.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630.3;D621.5

【相似文献】