基于功效函数法的合肥市城镇化发展质量研究
本文选题:城镇化发展质量 + 功效函数法 ; 参考:《安徽建筑大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:改革开放以来,我国城镇化建设取得突出成就,全国城镇化率由1978年的17.9%提升至2015年的56.1%,这表明我国已进入城镇人口超越农村人口的历史性时期。然而,在城镇化进程快速推进的背景下,我国城镇化建设中存在的问题也日益凸显,如部分地区过度追求城镇人口规模,忽视提升城镇居民生活质量,城镇基础设施与公共服务系统不健全,自然资源过度消耗和生态环境遭到破坏等。基于此,近年来国内学者对城镇化发展质量问题进行了一系列的探索;受国内城镇化发展现状的影响,多数学者将研究重点放在城镇化发展模式和城镇化发展质量的提升上,而有关如何合理地对城镇化发展质量进行测度和评价的研究相对较少。因而,作者通过对多目标规划原理的学习,将应用于企业财务绩效评价和金融体系风险预警的方法——功效函数法,引入到城镇化发展质量研究中,尝试从客观的角度分析和评价城镇化发展质量。本研究通过对系统理论、区域协调发展理论、城乡一体化理论和可持续发展理论的学习,深入分析了城镇化和城镇化发展的内涵;在对相关文献进行分析、总结的基础上,将城镇化发展质量系统分为经济发展与产业结构、城市建设与社会保障、居民收入与消费、科教文化卫生和资源与环境5个子系统,针对不同子系统选取了相应的评价指标,较为完整地构建了城镇化发展质量评价指标体系;其次,研究中以国内部分省会城市的城镇化数据为计算基础,通过指标权重、标准值和标准系数的计算,建立了城镇化发展质量相对性评价标准。为检验功效函数法应用于城镇化发展质量研究的可行性和实用性,文中以合肥市为例进行了实证研究。研究结果表明,合肥市城镇化发展质量总体上居于较高水平,但不同子系统的发展质量存在差异;其中,资源与环境及城市建设与社会服务层面的发展质量较好,科教文卫和居民收入与消费层面的发展质量居于中间水平,经济发展与产业结构的发展质量处于较低水平。文章最后,结合合肥市城镇化发展现状和实证研究结果,对合肥市后期城镇化建设提出了具体的建议。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, China has made outstanding achievements in the construction of urbanization, the national urbanization rate has increased from 17.9% in 1978 to 56.1% in 2015, which indicates that China has entered a historic period in which the urban population exceeds the rural population.However, in the context of the rapid progress of urbanization, the problems in the construction of urbanization in China have become increasingly prominent, such as excessive pursuit of urban population in some areas, neglect to improve the quality of life of urban residents.The urban infrastructure and public service system are not perfect, the natural resources are overconsumed and the ecological environment is destroyed.Based on this, in recent years, domestic scholars have carried out a series of explorations on the quality of urbanization development. Under the influence of the present situation of urbanization development, most scholars have focused their research on the urbanization development model and the improvement of urbanization development quality.However, there are few researches on how to measure and evaluate the development quality of urbanization.Therefore, by studying the principle of multi-objective programming, the author applies the efficiency function method, which is applied to enterprise financial performance evaluation and financial system risk early warning, to the study of the quality of urbanization development.This paper tries to analyze and evaluate the development quality of urbanization from an objective angle.Through the study of system theory, regional coordinated development theory, urban-rural integration theory and sustainable development theory, this study deeply analyzes the connotation of urbanization and urbanization development.The quality system of urbanization development is divided into five subsystems: economic development and industrial structure, urban construction and social security, residents' income and consumption, science, education, culture and health, and resources and environment.The evaluation index system of urbanization development quality is constructed completely. Secondly, based on the urbanization data of some provincial capitals in China, the index weight, standard value and standard coefficient are calculated.The relative evaluation standard of urbanization development quality is established.In order to test the feasibility and practicability of applying the efficacy function method to the study of urbanization development quality, this paper takes Hefei as an example to carry out an empirical study.The results show that the development quality of urbanization in Hefei is on the whole at a high level, but the development quality of different subsystems is different, among which, the development quality of resources and environment, urban construction and social service is better.The development quality of science, education, culture and health, residents' income and consumption is in the middle level, while the development quality of economic development and industrial structure is at a lower level.Finally, combined with the present situation of Hefei urbanization development and the results of empirical research, the paper puts forward some concrete suggestions for the later urbanization construction of Hefei.
【学位授予单位】:安徽建筑大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F299.27
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭施宏;王富喜;高明;;山东半岛人口城市化与土地城市化时空耦合协调关系研究[J];经济地理;2014年03期
2 李旭鸿;;城乡一体化进程中的“农民荒”问题调查及对策建议[J];中国财政;2012年10期
3 王德利;赵弘;孙莉;杨维凤;;首都经济圈城市化质量测度[J];城市问题;2011年12期
4 李明秋;郎学彬;;城市化质量的内涵及其评价指标体系的构建[J];中国软科学;2010年12期
5 王德利;方创琳;杨青山;李飞;;基于城市化质量的中国城市化发展速度判定分析[J];地理科学;2010年05期
6 余晖;;我国城市化质量问题的反思[J];开放导报;2010年01期
7 陈明星;陆大道;张华;;中国城市化水平的综合测度及其动力因子分析[J];地理学报;2009年04期
8 袁晓玲;王霄;何维炜;陈跃;;对城市化质量的综合评价分析——以陕西省为例[J];城市发展研究;2008年02期
9 夏德孝;张道宏;;区域协调发展理论的研究综述[J];生产力研究;2008年01期
10 郑亚平;聂锐;;从城市化质量认识省域经济发展差距[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2007年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 梁振民;新型城镇化背景下的东北地区城镇化质量评价研究[D];东北师范大学;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 许yN航;基于熵值法与功效系数法的太龙药业财务风险预警研究[D];湖南大学;2014年
2 陈丹;基于功效系数法的金融体系预警研究[D];河北工业大学;2014年
3 白晶;黑龙江省城镇化发展质量问题研究[D];吉林大学;2013年
4 高荣柏;基于功效系数法的春晖公司财务风险预警研究[D];湖南大学;2013年
,本文编号:1760124
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/1760124.html