“深阅读”之争议与再思考

发布时间：2018-07-02 23:48

本文选题：深阅读 + 争议　；参考：《国家图书馆学刊》2017年06期

【摘要】：学界关于深阅读的理解仍存在着诸多争议,未能满足实践繁荣下的理论需求。本研究从深度阅读推广目标设置、方案设计、绩效评估的理论需要出发,在梳理既有文献、析出争议焦点的同时,基于专家调查结果分析不同见解之间的内在联系,认为观点冲突的根本问题在于研究者对于深阅读的实现机制与价值诉求存在不同见解。通过对上述问题的探讨,提出深阅读是一场读者深度参与的主体间性对话,其价值一方面表现为阅读的应用实践价值、道德实践价值等,另一方面则表现为读者精神性与社会性需要的满足及其所赋予读者的阅读兴趣与可持续的阅读动力。
[Abstract]:There are still many controversies on the understanding of deep reading in academic circles, which fails to meet the theoretical needs of the prosperity of practice. This study starts from the theoretical needs of in-depth reading promotion goal setting, scheme design and performance evaluation, combing the existing literature, separating the focus of controversy, and analyzing the internal relationship between different opinions based on the results of expert survey. It is believed that the fundamental problem of conflict of views is that researchers have different views on the realization mechanism of deep reading and the demand of value. Through the discussion of the above problems, the author points out that the deep reading is a dialogue between the subjects in which the readers are deeply involved. On the one hand, the value of the deep reading is shown as the practical value of reading, the value of moral practice, and so on. On the other hand, it shows the satisfaction of the readers' spiritual and social needs and the reader's reading interest and sustainable reading power.
【作者单位】：四川大学公共管理学院信息资源管理系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目“全媒体环境下复合阅读行为及其阅读推广对策研究”(项目编号:16ATQ005)研究成果之一
【分类号】：G252.17

【相似文献】