社会工作者介入严重精神障碍社区服务综合评价指标体系的构建研究
发布时间:2018-09-01 15:04
【摘要】:目的建立科学、规范的社会工作者(社工)介入严重精神障碍社区服务综合评价指标体系。方法采用文献资料法和德尔菲法,建立社工介入严重精神障碍社区服务综合评价指标体系框架并编制专家咨询问卷;于2015年5—8月采用电子邮件的方式对10例从事临床精神医学、精神科护理、社会医学、社会工作、社区精神病学、公共卫生领域工作且具有10年及以上专业技术工作经历、中级及以上职称的专家进行两轮咨询,根据专家意见的协调程度和集中程度,对指标进行增减和修改,建立社工介入严重精神障碍社区服务综合评价指标体系及其权重。结果两轮专家咨询,均发放问卷10份,回收有效问卷10份,有效回收率均为100%。专家的熟悉系数、判断系数、权威系数分别为0.725、0.850、0.788。两轮专家意见协调系数(W)分别为0.403、0.464,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。构建了一个包括3个一级指标(资源投入、服务绩效、工作结果)、13个二级指标和58个三级指标的社工介入严重精神障碍社区服务综合评价指标体系,其中一级指标的权重分别为0.338 0、0.331 0、0.331 0。结论专家的积极程度高,权威性和协调性较好,筛选出的综合指标可为社工介入严重精神障碍社区服务综合评价提供依据。
[Abstract]:Objective to establish a scientific and standardized comprehensive evaluation index system for social workers involved in community services with severe mental disorders. Methods using the method of literature and Delphi, the framework of comprehensive evaluation index system of social workers' intervention in community service with severe mental disorders was established, and the questionnaire of expert consultation was compiled. From May to August 2015, 10 patients were engaged in clinical psychiatry, psychiatric nursing, social medicine, social work, community psychiatry, public health and had 10 years of professional and technical work experience. According to the degree of coordination and concentration of the expert opinion, the index was increased or decreased and modified, and the comprehensive evaluation index system and its weight of social worker intervention in community service for serious mental disorders were established. Results 10 questionnaires were sent out and 10 valid questionnaires were recovered in the two rounds of expert consultation. The effective recovery rate was 100 kum. The familiarity coefficient, judgment coefficient and authority coefficient of experts are 0.725 / 0. 850 / 0. 788 respectively. The coordination coefficient (W) of the two rounds of expert opinion was 0.403 and 0.464, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). A comprehensive evaluation index system of social workers' intervention in community services with severe mental disorders was constructed, which included 3 first-level indicators (resource input, service performance, work results), 13 second-level indicators and 58 third-level indicators. The weight of the first class index is 0.338 0 / 0.331 0 / 0.331 0 respectively. Conclusion the expert's positive degree is high, the authority and coordination are good, the comprehensive index can provide the basis for the social worker to intervene in the community service comprehensive evaluation of the serious mental disorder.
【作者单位】: 上海市长宁区精神卫生中心;上海市长宁区疾病预防控制中心;
【基金】:上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研项目(20134342)——社会工作者介入重性精神疾病社区治疗康复培训模块及评价指标研究
【分类号】:R749
,
本文编号:2217560
[Abstract]:Objective to establish a scientific and standardized comprehensive evaluation index system for social workers involved in community services with severe mental disorders. Methods using the method of literature and Delphi, the framework of comprehensive evaluation index system of social workers' intervention in community service with severe mental disorders was established, and the questionnaire of expert consultation was compiled. From May to August 2015, 10 patients were engaged in clinical psychiatry, psychiatric nursing, social medicine, social work, community psychiatry, public health and had 10 years of professional and technical work experience. According to the degree of coordination and concentration of the expert opinion, the index was increased or decreased and modified, and the comprehensive evaluation index system and its weight of social worker intervention in community service for serious mental disorders were established. Results 10 questionnaires were sent out and 10 valid questionnaires were recovered in the two rounds of expert consultation. The effective recovery rate was 100 kum. The familiarity coefficient, judgment coefficient and authority coefficient of experts are 0.725 / 0. 850 / 0. 788 respectively. The coordination coefficient (W) of the two rounds of expert opinion was 0.403 and 0.464, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). A comprehensive evaluation index system of social workers' intervention in community services with severe mental disorders was constructed, which included 3 first-level indicators (resource input, service performance, work results), 13 second-level indicators and 58 third-level indicators. The weight of the first class index is 0.338 0 / 0.331 0 / 0.331 0 respectively. Conclusion the expert's positive degree is high, the authority and coordination are good, the comprehensive index can provide the basis for the social worker to intervene in the community service comprehensive evaluation of the serious mental disorder.
【作者单位】: 上海市长宁区精神卫生中心;上海市长宁区疾病预防控制中心;
【基金】:上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研项目(20134342)——社会工作者介入重性精神疾病社区治疗康复培训模块及评价指标研究
【分类号】:R749
,
本文编号:2217560
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2217560.html