新三板农业公司多元化经营与企业绩效关系的实证研究
[Abstract]:Over the years, compared with foreign capital markets, China's capital market has been in the primary stage, and there are many problems. Although scholars from all walks of life have been studying and exploring the existing problems, but in view of China's past capital market practice, the development of the capital market can not meet the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, the capital market must enter. Therefore, in order to adapt to and promote the rapid development of small and medium-sized enterprises in China and improve the capital market, the State Council officially approved the establishment of a small and medium-sized enterprises share transfer system in 2013, the system has been rapidly developed since entering the public view, and has occupied a place in China's capital market. At present, most of the research on the new Third Board focuses on the conditions and difficulties of listing small and medium-sized enterprises, laws and regulations, financing effects of new third board listing enterprises and so on. However, the research on the performance evaluation of listed agricultural companies is seldom involved, not to mention the relationship between performance and diversification. The healthy development of agriculture has always been the foundation of our country in a large agricultural country, and it is very important to the social stability and economic development of our country. However, the agricultural listed companies in the third board market as the industry leader is also worthy of our study, but the study of the new third board enterprises is still mainly concentrated in the legal norms, listing conditions, system and financing effect, etc., for a certain type of enterprise performance research is rarely involved. The first chapter reviews the research on diversification, enterprise performance and their correlation by domestic and foreign scholars, and finds that there are some defects in the previous research results, such as the inconsistent definition standards of agricultural companies, the selection of indicators does not take into account China's national conditions, and so on. Chapter 2 briefly introduces the basic theory of the relationship between the two and the significance of each theory to the empirical study in the future, which makes the latter empirical study have a certain theoretical basis. In addition to the number of listed agricultural companies, earnings per share and net asset income, the paper also introduces the main business of 45 listed agricultural companies. The results show that the new three-board listed enterprises have a serious degree of diversification, but the operating effect is not good. Ideal. In order to explore the complex relationship between the two, only descriptive analysis is too one-sided, so this paper attempts to use multiple regression analysis and other empirical analysis for further research. Quantity is a dependent variable and five control variables. The fifth chapter is the empirical part of the paper, which is the focus of the full text. Five major factors are extracted by factor analysis. Secondly, a simple descriptive statistical analysis is carried out to list the mean and standard deviation of the corresponding variables of all listed companies in the three years from 2014. According to the step of factor analysis, the number of common factors in the article is determined by principal component analysis, and then the factor load matrix after rotation is obtained by the method of variance maximization. According to the matrix, the common factors extracted are named, and then the root is determined. According to the factor score of regression equation, the factor score equation and the comprehensive performance score equation are obtained. The paper divides the enterprise performance into five major factors by factor analysis, and scores and evaluates each factor and the comprehensive performance separately. Scores can be used to test the seven hypotheses proposed in this paper. It is worth noting that the limitations of common factor extraction and the randomness of variables make the relevant conclusions of Hypothesis 7 impossible to judge temporarily. On the premise of regression analysis, the relationship between diversification and performance is studied. The results show that diversification and performance of agricultural enterprises listed on the new third board are negatively correlated. At the same time, as far as the impact of diversification on the five capabilities of enterprises is concerned, diversification has a negative effect on the solvency and asset management of enterprises. According to the conclusion, we can explain that hypothesis 3 and Hypothesis 7 are not valid, and other hypotheses are all valid. Chapter 6, combined with the characteristics of the new three-board agricultural market, China's small and medium-sized enterprises share transfer system started late, the development time is short, and the market is open. The market mechanism is not perfect, and the performance gap of agricultural enterprises listed on the new third board is large. There is a huge gap between the new third board and the main board, small and medium-sized listed companies in agriculture, but it shows potential and advantages in the growth capacity. This paper gives two suggestions, first of all in the market hope that the relevant departments can be positive. It is hoped that the listed agricultural enterprises can operate appropriately and improve their performance.
【学位授予单位】:长江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:F324;F302.6;F832.51
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱冬林;多元化经营的辨证思考[J];工业技术经济;2000年06期
2 饶继红,李凯;多元化经营与核心竞争力[J];经济师;2000年04期
3 王任华;相关多元化经营模式[J];企业活力;2000年12期
4 邱景红;多元化经营市场机会分析及策略[J];统计与决策;2000年07期
5 叶林;电信多元化经营宜由主业控股[J];邮电企业管理;2000年03期
6 刘顺祥;多元化经营 再创新格局[J];华北电业;2000年02期
7 程丹;多元化经营的三个误区[J];企业改革与管理;2000年09期
8 袁明军,张志伟,丁岚山;论企业的多元化经营[J];山东电力高等专科学校学报;2000年01期
9 秦绪迎;浅谈多元化经营[J];山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报;2000年03期
10 邢启邦;纽柯探索多元化经营[J];山东冶金;2000年02期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 金守清;;第25章 核心竞争力和多元化经营[A];核心竞争力与企业管理创新研讨会暨中国企业管理研究会2002年年会论文集[C];2002年
2 付伟军;;湖北省盐业运销系统多元化经营的动因——关于多元化经营的理论探讨与分析之一[A];2004鄂盐研究学术交流研讨会论文集[C];2004年
3 覃志刚;;我国上市公司多元化经营成功因素实证研究[A];教育部文科重点研究基地联谊会2008年年会暨青年经济学者论坛论文集[C];2008年
4 王晓安;;关于多元化发展的若干思考[A];2004年论文汇编[C];2004年
5 许宝星;;论企业的核心竞争力[A];提升核心竞争力——浙江省经营管理研究会2004年年会论文汇集[C];2005年
6 唐建亮;;加快转变发展方式 不断提升管理水平——更好地为铁路安全运输和职工家属服务[A];第三届铁路安全风险管理及技术装备研讨会论文集(上册)[C];2012年
7 徐飞;;多元化经营与公司价值[A];中国会计学会第六届理事会第二次会议暨2004年学术年会论文集(上)[C];2004年
8 姚禄仕;姜云;;上市公司多元化经营与资本结构相关性研究综述[A];中国会计学会高等工科院校分会2009年学术会议(第十六届学术年会)论文集[C];2009年
9 刘金霞;;沈阳铁道金属物资有限公司多元化经营发展与途径[A];第十五届中国科协年会第11分会场:综合交通与物流发展研讨会论文集[C];2013年
10 袁玲;;国有控股、多元化经营与公司价值[A];中国会计学会2011学术年会论文集[C];2011年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 鑫牛证券网 李云霞;多元化经营风险与经营业绩[N];金融时报;2000年
2 林松娟邋记者 谭迎春;超六成企业集团多元化经营[N];黑龙江日报;2007年
3 记者 孙秀霞;我省超六成企业集团实施多元化经营[N];黑龙江经济报;2007年
4 敖娟;“多元化经营”应量力而行[N];中国建材报;2010年
5 晁前飞;多元化经营需要专业化服务[N];21世纪药店;2012年
6 林曙光;药店多元化经营的规范命题[N];医药经济报;2012年
7 兰州铁路局;关于多元化经营的调研与思考[N];人民铁道;2013年
8 贵航实业公司企管部部长 曹光明;“汽车露营地产业”适合多元化经营[N];中国航空报;2014年
9 ;企业多元化经营的成败得失[N];安徽经济报;2000年
10 潘秀丽;多元化经营的风险点[N];中国财经报;2005年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 何秉卓;中国保险公司多元化经营与绩效的关系研究[D];浙江大学;2016年
2 战颂;民营企业多元化经营与绩效研究[D];辽宁大学;2016年
3 徐康康;上市企业集团多元化经营与绩效关系的比较研究[D];复旦大学;2003年
4 李雪峰;多元化经营与公司绩效关系研究[D];华中科技大学;2011年
5 魏立江;基于终极控制人视角的多元化经营及绩效研究[D];暨南大学;2009年
6 潘瑞姣;多元化理论与中国上市公司多元化经营影响因素研究[D];复旦大学;2005年
7 薛超;我国城市商业银行规模扩张与多元化经营研究[D];南开大学;2014年
8 王圆圆;企业多元化经营与绩效的关系[D];对外经济贸易大学;2015年
9 张奎;股权结构、多元化经营与公司价值[D];复旦大学;2004年
10 赵景芬;农业上市公司多元化经营测度、影响因素及绩效研究[D];沈阳农业大学;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 谢光喜;多元化经营对我国工业上市公司业绩影响的实证研究[D];重庆大学;2005年
2 王巍;海尔集团多元化经营评价[D];长安大学;2013年
3 姜鑫;我国建筑业上市公司多元化经营与财务绩效的实证研究[D];武汉理工大学;2014年
4 张克然;邢台市新华书店多元化经营研究[D];河北大学;2015年
5 甘露;多元化经营与盈余管理关系的实证研究[D];石河子大学;2015年
6 李波;多元化经营、股权结构与企业价值[D];西南交通大学;2015年
7 熊荣萍;Y N能源集团多元化经营与资本运作研究[D];云南财经大学;2015年
8 朱凌燕;红豆集团多元化经营及绩效评价研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
9 张晗;多元化经营与我国商业银行绩效及风险关系的研究[D];南京大学;2014年
10 俞文磊;企业多元化经营对总经理被动离职的影响[D];南京大学;2014年
,本文编号:2241610
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2241610.html