反腐倡廉与企业经营绩效——基于业务招待费的研究
[Abstract]:Based on the exogenous impact of anti-corruption and clean government since the end of 2012, this paper discusses the influence mechanism of anti-corruption on micro-enterprises. In particular, due to differences in the nature of property rights, business hospitality costs may be more of an agency problem of executive corruption in state-owned enterprises and government (state-owned enterprises) relationship investments in non-state-owned enterprises. Anti-corruption may have a different impact on business hospitality and performance of the two types of enterprises. Based on the unique perspective of the influence mechanism of the differentiation of business hospitality, this paper finds that: (1) Anti-corruption will significantly reduce the business hospitality costs of state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises. And the decline of state-owned enterprises is greater (or a smaller increase). At the same time, the decline in business hospitality costs is significantly positively correlated with consumption cash expenditures, other management costs, sales costs, and the decline in inventory, excluding the assumption that the decline in business hospitality costs is a cost manipulation and categorization. (2) after combating corruption, Reduced business hospitality costs have led to significant improvements in business efficiency and performance (including accounting performance and market performance), indicating that combating corruption and promoting integrity have led managers to shift more energy to business activities, (3) for the above conclusions, the change of state-owned enterprises is more obvious than that of non-state-owned enterprises, indicating that state-owned enterprises are more affected by anti-corruption. Finally, under the background of fighting corruption and advocating clean government, this paper investigates the changes of business hospitality expenses of state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises and its influence on the business performance of enterprises, which provides a direct and strong empirical basis for the positive policy effect of combating corruption and promoting honesty in China. It has significant practical significance. At the same time, it also expands the theoretical research of corporate governance and other related fields.
【作者单位】: 厦门大学管理学院;厦门国家会计学院;
【基金】:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“大数据环境下财务报告分析框架的重构与应用”(15JJD630011)
【分类号】:D262.6;F272.5;F275
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴思琦;;现行税法下企业业务招待费的税务筹划[J];时代金融;2013年09期
2 张贵民;企业业务招待费为何居高不下?[J];中国工运;1996年01期
3 谭清正;是整顿企业业务招待费的时候了[J];中国工运;1996年05期
4 杨兴富;坚持实行业务招待费向职代会报告制度[J];中国工运;1996年10期
5 曹谷良;;铁十四局建立业务招待费用向职代会报告制度[J];工会论坛;1996年03期
6 凡向民,马鸿林;周口地区电业局两年节约业务招待费百万元[J];中国监察;1997年03期
7 童狄生;要解决“业务招待费报告制度”执行中的问题[J];中国监察;1997年06期
8 野墨,德辉;企业业务招待费向职代会报告难[J];中国工会财会;1997年03期
9 ;加强领导 强化措施 促进企业业务招待费报告制度的落实[J];山东省工会管理干部学院学报;1999年04期
10 郭炜 ,郭若华;对国个执行业务招待费报告制度的思考[J];中国监察;2002年11期
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 张建聪 盛亿钊;业务招待费不是“避风港”[N];中国财经报;2006年
2 连江 字苓;娱乐消费挤入企业业务招待费[N];中国税务报;2007年
3 刘乐柱;江西局一九五队 控制业务招待费有新招[N];中煤地质报;2010年
4 李柏生;如何合理筹划业务招待费[N];财会信报;2010年
5 冯建荣 许士和;企业筹办期业务招待费如何扣除[N];中国税务报;2012年
6 程辉;业务招待费的税前扣除与会计处理[N];财会信报;2012年
7 王毅;业务招待费扣除注意四项规定[N];中国税务报;2013年
8 梁仁琼 钟美辉 廖永红;业务招待费扣除莫违规[N];中国税务报;2013年
9 张颖川;假如取消业务招待费……[N];现代物流报;2013年
10 刘炜;业务招待费花样知多少[N];中国税务报;2003年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 刘杰;业务招待,隐性激励还是漏洞?[D];西安电子科技大学;2014年
2 刘辰;大型外贸企业业务招待费税前扣除比例问题的研究[D];暨南大学;2015年
,本文编号:2246762
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/jixiaoguanli/2246762.html