家长式领导的有效性:来自Meta分析的证据

发布时间：2018-11-15 10:49

【摘要】：本文运用Meta分析方法,对家长式领导与领导效能相关的87篇实证研究文献进行了阶段性总结,共获得436个效应值,40879个独立样本,总样本量达118108个。结果发现:家长式领导风格下不同领导行为对领导效能有不同的影响,其中仁慈领导是最为有效的领导方式,威权领导的效能是负向的。仁慈领导、德行领导对员工工作态度(工作满意度、组织承诺、离职倾向)的影响程度要强于对员工工作行为(组织公民行为、任务绩效)的影响程度。此外,在分析三种领导方式与个体绩效的关系时发现,相比于任务绩效,三种领导方式更能促进关系绩效;同源偏差程度能够显著调节三种领导方式与个体绩效的相关程度。通过对工作价值观的调节分析动态考察三种领导方式的效能,本文发现,随着员工价值观的改变,仁慈领导、德行领导的效能在增强,而威权领导效能的变化却不明显。
[Abstract]:Using the Meta analysis method, this paper summarizes 87 empirical studies on the relationship between parental leadership and leadership efficacy. A total of 436 effect values are obtained, and 40879 independent samples, with a total sample size of 118108, are obtained. The results show that different leadership behaviors have different effects on leadership efficacy under the paternalistic leadership style, among which benevolent leadership is the most effective leadership style, and authoritarian leadership is negative. Benevolent leadership and moral leadership have greater influence on employee's work attitude (job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention) than on employee's work behavior (organizational citizenship behavior, task performance). In addition, in the analysis of the relationship between the three leadership styles and individual performance, it is found that the three leadership styles can promote the relationship performance more than task performance, and the degree of homologous deviation can significantly regulate the correlation between the three types of leadership and individual performance. Through the dynamic analysis of the adjustment of work values, this paper finds that with the change of employee values, benevolent leadership, moral leadership effectiveness is enhanced, but the change of authoritarian leadership effectiveness is not obvious.
【作者单位】：华南理工大学工商管理学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(11YJA630004) 中央高校基金科研业务费资助项目(X2gsD2117810)资助
【分类号】：F272.92

【相似文献】