金融专利审查标准研究

发布时间：2018-04-05 17:26

本文选题：金融专利　切入点：商业方法专利　出处：《华中科技大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：金融是现代经济的核心,金融活动己经成为整个经济活动的基础和核心,在一国经济发展中处于举足轻重的地位,金融业的发展离不开金融专利的长效支持,对专利研发者开发出的金融产品授予专利权是对研发者的智力劳动成果的最有效保护,会极大的激发研发者的创造积极性。金融专利审查标准的制定和执行对金融业的前景影响深远,基于此本文将在《专利审查指南2010年版》以及国家知识产权局2004年10月颁布的《商业方法发明相关专利申请的审查细则(试行)》的基础上对金融专利审查标准进行深入的研究和探讨,进而提出对我国金融专利的审查标准制定的建议。金融专利的审查标准是赋予金融专利专利权的基本标准要求,各国根据自己国家的具体国情制定自己的审查标准。《中华人民共和国专利法》自1985年4月1日实施以来,在2000年8月25日,做了第二次修改,都是对技术专利的审查指南的规定,只涉及到了金融专利的第一类专利,诸如点钞机、保险柜等以技术为特征的金融专利。到2004年10月,国家知识产权局颁布了《商业方法发明相关专利申请的审查细则(试行)》本,其间明确规定了商业方法相关的发明专利申请的可专利性的审查标准。在执行了近两年后以2006年版的《审查指南》生效宣告失效。之后2008年8月的第三次修订,2009年10月1日生效的《审查指南》,都没有对商业方法类金融专利的审查细则,2010年版的《审查指南》在第九章有关于涉及计算机程序的发明专利申请审查的若干规定,但是,并没有明确或者说单独列出一节对金融专利进行规定。目前美、日、欧以及国内的专家学者、研究生都在对金融专利进行进一步的研究,审查标准的研究是未来的热点。各国的金融业以及金融专利的竞争与合作,首先是金融专利审查标准的竞争与合作。本文采用比较研究和具体案例分析的方法,从金融专利的审查标准的形式标准和实质标准入手进行研究,最终提出符合我国现状和未来趋势的金融专利审查标准的建议,以供国家立法参考。全文除摘要外共分为五个部分和结论,摘要部分是对全文主要观点内容和论文结构的简要介绍。第一部分,绪论。是对研究的议题介绍、研究的现实意义和理论意义、研究对象和范围限定、研究思路和框架、研究的主要内容、主要研究方法和可能的创新点等的介绍。第二部分,金融专利的界定。是对金融专利的涵义与特征、金融专利的涵义以及相关概念介绍、金融专利的特征、金融专利的研究和应用现状、金融专利的国内外研究现状、金融专利在金融业中的运用现状描述等的介绍和描述。第三部分,金融专利可专利性(形式)标准分析。是对金融专利可专利性概述、金融专利授权的一般标准介绍、国际金融专利授权的形式标准介绍、我国金融专利授权的形式标准介绍、美、日、欧金融专利可专利性标准趋势分析、我国金融专利可专利性标准界定、我国已授权的金融专利案例分析、我国目前金融专利可专利性标准分析、我国将来金融专利可专利性最佳采用标准建议等的介绍和分析。第四部分,美、日、欧及我国金融专利实质审查标准对比研究。是对美国、日本、欧盟的金融专利的实质审查标准的介绍和对比分析研究。第五部分,我国将来金融专利审查标准创建建议。是对我国金融专利审查标准创建的必要性的分析、我国未来金融专利形式标准和实质标准的建立的建议。结论:总结全文的研究结果,和对主要观点做出总结。
[Abstract]:Finance is the core of modern economy, financial activities has become the foundation and core of the whole economic activities, plays an important role in the economic development in a country, the long-term support of the development of the financial sector cannot do without the financial patent, patent for developers to develop financial products patent is the most effective protection for developers intellectual labor, will greatly stimulate the developers to create enthusiasm. Formulate financial patent examination standard and Prospects on the implementation of the financial industry has far-reaching influence, this article will patent applications for inventions related to the review of the rules in the < 2010 Edition > and the guidelines for patent examination method of commercial State Intellectual Property Bureau issued in October 2004 "(for Trial Implementation Based on >) on the basis of the financial patent examination standards for in-depth research and study, and puts forward the development of China's patent examination standards for financial advice.
Financial patent review standard is a basic standard request gives financial patent right, all according to their specific conditions of countries to develop standards. People's Republic of China patent law of its own since April 1, 1985, in August 25, 2000, second to do a modification, are specified in the patent examination guidelines on technology, relates only to the first patent financial patent, such as currency-counting machine, financial patent safes and other characteristics of the technology. By October 2004, the State Intellectual Property Office issued the "business method patent applications for inventions related to the review of rules (Trial)", during which specifies the examination standard of business method related to the application for a patent for invention patent. In the past two years after the execution. In the 2006 edition of the "Review Guide > lapsed into effect. After the August 2008 third revision, effective October 1, 2009" Review Guide >, are not on the business method patent review the financial rules, regulations, guidelines for the review of the 2010 edition of < > are related to the computer patent application review process in the ninth chapter, however, there is no clear or separately one of the provisions of the financial patent. At present, the United States, experts and scholars in Europe as well as domestic, graduate students in financial patent for further study, the standard of review is the next hot spot. The financial industry and financial patent competition and cooperation, competition and cooperation is the first financial patent examination standard. This paper uses the method of comparative study and analysis of specific cases, from the financial patent review the standard form and essence standards of research, finally puts forward the current situation of our country and the future trend of the patent examination standards of financial proposals for national legislation for reference.
In addition to the summary, the full text is divided into five parts and conclusions, and the summary is a brief introduction to the main points of view and the structure of the paper.
The first part is the introduction, which is the introduction of the research topics, the practical significance and theoretical significance of the research, the object and scope of the research, the train of thought and framework, the main contents of the research, the main research methods and possible innovations.
The second part, the definition of financial patents. Is the meaning and characteristics of the financial patent, patent financial implications and the introduction of the related concept, characteristics of financial patents, research and application status of financial patents, research status of domestic and foreign financial financial patent, patent in the financial industry in the description of the current situation is introduced and described.
The third part, the financial patent patentability (standard form) is analyzed. The financial patent patentability overview, introduces the general standard of financial patent, the patent authorization form of international financial standards, authorized financial patent in China in the form of standard introduction, beauty, analysis of Patent Standard trend of European financial patent our country can define the financial patent patentability standards, analysis of China's authorized financial patent case, China's current financial patent patentability standard analysis, China's future financial patent introduction and analysis of the optimal patent using standard recommendations.
The fourth part is a comparative study of the substantive examination standards of financial patents in the US, Japan, Europe and China. It is an introduction and comparative analysis of the substantive review standards for the financial patents of the United States, Japan and the European Union.
The fifth part, the suggestion of our financial patent review standard in the future, is the analysis of the necessity of establishing our financial patent review standard, and the suggestion for the establishment of our financial patent form standard and substantive standard in the future.
Conclusion: summarize the results of the full text and summarize the main points of view.

【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.42;F832.2;G306

【相似文献】