当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 科研管理论文 >

论科技异化及其对我国构建和谐社会的影响、对策

发布时间:2018-05-02 21:32

  本文选题:科技异化 + 工具理性 ; 参考:《山东财经大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:在原始社会,科技与人文是浑然不分,一体不二的,其产生和存在的终极目的就是为人类服务。但随着人类广泛深入的使用科技,人们对科技产生了极度的依赖,科技开始作用于社会生活的各个方面,科技影响着人类的文化、思想、意识形态、社会组织等方面,导致工具理性甚嚣尘上。人们的思想和行为被工具理性全面的主导和覆盖,人们失去了选择的自由,行为必须屈从于无孔不入的工具理性,片面追求利益的最大化。科技中的人文向度逐渐被吞噬,科学技术发生了全面的本质的异化。具体表现在人类对自然界的剥削和滥用,在社会领域则主要表现在生产、消费、文化、教育及社会管理等领域。科技异化应该是发达资本主义国家的产物,但是由于工具理性思维的渗透和全球化浪潮等内外因的共同作用,科技异化逐渐向社会主义国家、向欠发达国家蔓延和扩展,呈现出了一种普遍化的倾向。科技异化在短时期内可能有利于我国提高科技水平,发展社会生产力,,但科技异化承载的发展方式是短视的、不可持续的,这种发展方式是以资源的破坏和环境的污染为代价的,如果任其发展不加制止,必将带来毁灭性的威胁。社会科技发展的历史经验告诉我们,必须从一开始就要注重和强调科技的人文向度,引导工具理性和价值理性的融合发展,促进科技为构建和谐社会服务。
[Abstract]:In the primitive society, science and technology and humanities are inseparable, and their ultimate purpose is to serve human beings. However, with the extensive and in-depth use of science and technology, people have become extremely dependent on science and technology. Science and technology have begun to affect all aspects of social life. Science and technology affect human culture, ideology, ideology, social organization, and so on. It leads to a great clamour of instrumental rationality. People's thoughts and behaviors are dominated and covered by instrumental rationality, and people lose the freedom of choice, and act must submit to the all-pervasive instrumental rationality and unilaterally pursue the maximization of interests. The humanistic dimension of science and technology is gradually swallowed up, science and technology has a comprehensive nature of alienation. It is embodied in the exploitation and abuse of nature by human beings, and in the fields of production, consumption, culture, education and social management in the field of society. The alienation of science and technology should be the product of the developed capitalist countries. However, due to the combination of internal and external factors such as the penetration of instrumental rational thinking and the wave of globalization, the alienation of science and technology is gradually spreading and expanding to the socialist countries and to the less developed countries. There is a tendency to generalize. In a short period of time, the alienation of science and technology may help our country to raise the level of science and technology and develop the productive forces of society, but the mode of development carried by the alienation of science and technology is short-sighted and unsustainable. This mode of development is at the cost of the destruction of resources and pollution of the environment. If it is left unchecked, it will bring about a devastating threat. The historical experience of the development of social science and technology tells us that we must pay attention to and emphasize the humanistic dimension of science and technology from the beginning, guide the integration of instrumental rationality and value rationality, and promote science and technology to serve the construction of a harmonious society.
【学位授予单位】:山东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G301

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 刘长明;管斌;;和谐发展的“圆理”[J];北方论丛;2008年05期

2 张一兵;工具理性对社会生活的渗透——中后期法兰克福学派的一种社会批判[J];教学与研究;2001年07期

3 张芳喜;;科学与人文分离的原因探析[J];理论与现代化;2006年04期

4 李桂花;;“科技异化”释义[J];吉林师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年01期

5 戈士国;新教伦理:西方现代资本主义的道德支撑——解读马克斯·韦伯和《新教伦理与资本主义精神》[J];天府新论;2005年05期

6 李文潮;技术伦理与形而上学——试论尤纳斯《责任原理》[J];自然辩证法研究;2003年02期



本文编号:1835578

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/keyanlw/1835578.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户296b2***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com