媒体误读科研成果,专家辟谣难消影响

发布时间：2018-06-06 04:25

  本文选题：耐药菌 + 谨慎处理　； 参考：《科技导报》2016年23期

【摘要】：正2016年11月,瑞典哥德堡大学研究人员在《Microbiome》发表"The structureand diversity of human,animal and envi-ronmental resistomes"(人、动物和环境耐药基因组的结构与多样性)一文,被部分国内媒体误读,将北京雾霾与耐药菌捆绑在一起,称北京雾霾中存在耐药菌且其对抗生素具有耐药性,引发了公众热议。随后,国内权威媒体邀请相关领域科研人员进行了解读辟谣,但"抢先发布、随后矫正"的报道方式并不利于科学的有效传播。学术成果的科学化报道究竟如何开展,对待存疑的结论,如何谨慎处理并客
[Abstract]:In November 2016, researchers at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden published an article entitled "The structureand diversity of human animal and envi-ronmental resistomes" (structure and diversity of drug-resistant genomes in humans, animals and environments), which was misread by some domestic media and bundled Beijing haze with drug-resistant bacteria. Public debate over the presence of drug-resistant bacteria in Beijing's haze and their resistance to antibiotics has sparked public debate. Later, the domestic authoritative media invited researchers in relevant fields to interpret and refute the rumor, but the "first release, then correction" report was not conducive to the effective dissemination of science. How to carry out the Scientific report on academic achievements, how to deal with the conclusion of doubt, and how to deal with the problem carefully
【分类号】：G206;G322
，

本文编号：1985079