区域科普绩效综合评价与分析

发布时间：2018-06-09 14:08

本文选题：科普绩效 + 综合评价　；参考：《湖南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：科普是提高公民科学素质的重要途径和实现方式。作为国家基础教育与基础建设的重要组成部分,科普工作是一项宏伟的社会工程,意义深远。然而,科普的绩效怎样,如何科学合理地评价科普绩效,是开展科普工作必须考虑的重要因素。国内外关于科普绩效评价的研究相对比较少,评价体系并不统一,缺乏定量和系统的分析与研究。因此,建立科学实用的科普绩效评价指标体系,科学客观地评价科普绩效,全面准确地反映科普发展情况,为政府及相关部门提供管理和决策依据,促进科普事业的健康发展。本文首先界定了区域科普绩效相关概念的内涵,对科普绩效评价的相关理论进行了回顾和简要评述。其次,综合考虑指标的全面性和代表性,从科普人员、科普设施、科普经费、科普宣传和科普活动等5个方面构建了区域科普绩效评价指标体系,并采用距优平方和法与变异系数法联合对各指标进行赋权,运用投影寻踪评价模型对2013年我国31个省市区的科普绩效进行评价分析。在此基础上,利用泰尔指数对科普绩效的区域差异进行分析。研究结论表明:(1)整体来看,我国各省域的科普绩效不平衡,北京、上海、天津地区在科普绩效上具有明显优势,大致呈现出从东部、中部到西部依次递减的趋势;(2)区域科普绩效的“东中西”梯度已不是很明显,部分西部地区科普绩效的相对指标并不落后,排名比较靠前;(3)为更客观比较各地区科普绩效的差异情况,运用泰尔指数进行测算,结果表明在总体差异中地区间的差异和B类区域的内部差异比较显著。
[Abstract]:Popular science is an important way to improve the scientific quality of citizens. As an important part of national basic education and infrastructure construction, the work of popularizing science is a grand social project with far-reaching significance. However, the performance of science popularization and how to evaluate it scientifically and reasonably are the important factors that must be considered in carrying out the work of science popularization. At home and abroad, the research on performance evaluation of popular science is relatively few, the evaluation system is not uniform, lack of quantitative and systematic analysis and research. Therefore, the establishment of scientific and practical performance evaluation index system of science popularization, scientific and objective evaluation of science performance, comprehensively and accurately reflect the development of science popularization, provide management and decision-making basis for the government and related departments, and promote the healthy development of science popularization. Firstly, this paper defines the connotation of the concept of regional popular science performance, and reviews the relevant theories of science popularization performance evaluation. Secondly, considering the comprehensiveness and representativeness of the index, this paper constructs the regional performance evaluation index system of science popularization from five aspects: science popularization personnel, science popularization facilities, science popularization funds, science popularization propaganda and science popularization activities. The authors use the square sum method of distance optimization and the coefficient of variation method to give weight to each index, and use projection pursuit evaluation model to evaluate and analyze the performance of science popularization in 31 provinces and municipalities in China in 2013. On this basis, the Tyr index is used to analyze the regional differences of popular science performance. The conclusion of the study shows that, overall, the performance of science popularization in various provinces of China is unbalanced. Beijing, Shanghai and Tianjin have obvious advantages in the performance of science popularization. The gradient of regional science popularization performance is no longer obvious, and the relative index of science popularization performance in some western regions is not backward. In order to compare the differences of the performance of science popularization in different regions objectively, we use the Thiel index to measure the results. The results show that the differences between the regions and the internal differences of the B regions are significant in the overall differences.
【学位授予单位】：湖南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G315

【参考文献】