江苏省政府科技投入绩效评价研究
发布时间：2018-07-17 05:45
【摘要】：在科技活动中,存在典型的市场失灵现象,科技投入不能完全依赖于市场规律,因此,科技事业的发展必然需要政府公共财政的支持。近年来,随着我国各级政府科技投入强度的逐步加大,政府科技投入的绩效管理也成为学术界和相关政府部门关注的热点。本研究以江苏省政府科技投入绩效为研究对象,采用纵向与横向对比分析的方法对江苏省政府科技投入与产出的现状进行分析;在科学性、可行性、可比性、系统性和整体性原则指导下,根据政府科技投入绩效评价的目的,从投入与产出两个方面构建了江苏省政府科技投入绩效评价指标体系,并分析了这些指标的内涵;继而综合运用定性分析法和数据包络分析(DEA),从综合有效性、技术有效性、规模有效性以及规模收益等角度对1999-2008年江苏省政府科技投入绩效进行综合评价,主要结论如下: (1)从综合有效性的角度看,2006-2008年间及1999江苏省政府科技投入绩效为DEA有效;2000-2005年期间,江苏省政府科技投入绩效出现非DEA有效,造成非DEA有效的原因是这几年的科技产出相对不足,科技人力资源和科技资金的利用效率不高,造成产出的相对不足。 (2)从技术有效性的角度看,1999-2008年期间,除2001、2002、2004这3年是技术无效外,其他年份都是技术有效。说明在这3年中,江苏省的科研机构对科技人力资源和政府科技资金没有达到完全有效利用的程度,科技投入产出的有效转化率相对另外7年偏低,但是,这3年技术效益的DEA分值都在0.9以上,如果相关部门能改善科技人力资源和政府科技资金的投入要素组合,对人力和资金加强管理,则可以有效的提高技术效率。 (3)从规模有效性及规模收益的角度看,1999年和2006-2008年江苏省政府科技投入规模有效,规模收益不变,规模既不偏大也不偏小,处于规模合理阶段。2000-2005年政府科技投入规模无效。其中2003年规模收益递减,产出倍数的增长低于投入倍数的增长,此时规模偏大;2000-2002年以及2004-2005年这5年规模收益递增,产出倍数的增长高于投入倍数的增长,此时规模偏小。 综合江苏省政府科技投入的综合有效性、技术有效性和规模有效性来看,2000-2005年江苏省政府科技投入产出绩效良好;而1999年和2006-2008年政府科技投入产出已经达到了综合效率、技术效率和规模效率均为1并且规模收益不变的良好发展态势,目前江苏省政府科技投入的产出绩效是在不断提升的,产出绩效优异。 本研究认为,把握政府科技投入的正确方向是促进科技进步和社会经济协调发展的关键,提高政府科技投入效率的重要途径是改革科技投入机制,实现政府科技投入效益的根本措施是构建以人为本的科技创新体系。
[Abstract]:In science and technology activities, there is a typical phenomenon of market failure, and the investment of science and technology can not completely depend on the law of the market. Therefore, the development of science and technology must need the support of the government public finance. In recent years, with the gradual increase of the intensity of scientific and technological investment, the performance management of government science and technology investment has become a hot spot in academic circles and related government departments. This study takes the scientific and technological input performance of Jiangsu provincial government as the research object, and analyzes the current situation of the scientific and technological input and output of Jiangsu provincial government by using the method of longitudinal and horizontal comparative analysis, which is scientific, feasible and comparable. Under the guidance of the principle of systematicness and integrality, according to the purpose of evaluating the performance of government input in science and technology, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of scientific and technological input performance of Jiangsu provincial government from two aspects of input and output, and analyzes the connotation of these indicators. Then using qualitative analysis method and data envelopment analysis (DEA), this paper comprehensively evaluates the scientific and technological investment performance of Jiangsu Provincial Government from the aspects of comprehensive efficiency, technical effectiveness, scale effectiveness and scale income, etc. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) from the point of view of comprehensive efficiency, the performance of science and technology input from 2006 to 2008 and from 1999 to 1999 is DEA effective. The reason for the non-DEA efficiency is that the scientific and technological output is relatively insufficient in recent years, and the utilization efficiency of scientific and technological human resources and scientific and technological funds is not high. (2) from the point of view of technical effectiveness, the period 1999-2008, Except 2001 / 2002 / 2004, which is invalid, the other years are technical validity. It shows that in the past three years, the scientific research institutions in Jiangsu Province have not fully utilized scientific and technological human resources and government science and technology funds, and the effective conversion rates of scientific and technological inputs and outputs have been relatively low compared to the other seven years, but, The DEA score for the technical benefits of these three years is all above 0.9. If the relevant departments can improve the combination of input elements of science and technology human resources and government science and technology funds, and strengthen the management of human resources and funds, (3) from the perspective of scale effectiveness and scale income, the scale of science and technology investment of Jiangsu Provincial Government in 1999 and 2006-2008 is effective, the scale income is unchanged, and the scale is neither large nor small. In a reasonable scale. 2000-2005 government investment in science and technology scale is invalid. In 2003, the scale return decreased, the output multiple increased less than the input multiple, and the scale was larger than the input multiple in 2000-2002 and 2004-2005. The output multiple was higher than the input multiple, and the scale was small. In view of the comprehensive effectiveness, technical effectiveness and scale effectiveness of the scientific and technological input from Jiangsu provincial government, the performance of scientific and technological input and output of Jiangsu provincial government from 2000 to 2005 is good, while in 1999 and 2006 to 2008, the comprehensive efficiency of scientific and technological input and output has been achieved. The technical efficiency and scale efficiency are both 1 and the scale income is unchanged. At present, the output performance of science and technology input of Jiangsu provincial government is constantly improving, and the output performance is excellent. This study holds that the key to promote the scientific and technological progress and the coordinated development of social economy is to grasp the correct direction of the government's scientific and technological input, and the important way to improve the efficiency of the government's scientific and technological investment is to reform the scientific and technological investment mechanism. The fundamental measure to realize the benefit of government investment in science and technology is to build a scientific and technological innovation system based on people.
【学位授予单位】：南京航空航天大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：G322.7;F224
本文编号：2129273
[Abstract]:In science and technology activities, there is a typical phenomenon of market failure, and the investment of science and technology can not completely depend on the law of the market. Therefore, the development of science and technology must need the support of the government public finance. In recent years, with the gradual increase of the intensity of scientific and technological investment, the performance management of government science and technology investment has become a hot spot in academic circles and related government departments. This study takes the scientific and technological input performance of Jiangsu provincial government as the research object, and analyzes the current situation of the scientific and technological input and output of Jiangsu provincial government by using the method of longitudinal and horizontal comparative analysis, which is scientific, feasible and comparable. Under the guidance of the principle of systematicness and integrality, according to the purpose of evaluating the performance of government input in science and technology, this paper constructs the evaluation index system of scientific and technological input performance of Jiangsu provincial government from two aspects of input and output, and analyzes the connotation of these indicators. Then using qualitative analysis method and data envelopment analysis (DEA), this paper comprehensively evaluates the scientific and technological investment performance of Jiangsu Provincial Government from the aspects of comprehensive efficiency, technical effectiveness, scale effectiveness and scale income, etc. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) from the point of view of comprehensive efficiency, the performance of science and technology input from 2006 to 2008 and from 1999 to 1999 is DEA effective. The reason for the non-DEA efficiency is that the scientific and technological output is relatively insufficient in recent years, and the utilization efficiency of scientific and technological human resources and scientific and technological funds is not high. (2) from the point of view of technical effectiveness, the period 1999-2008, Except 2001 / 2002 / 2004, which is invalid, the other years are technical validity. It shows that in the past three years, the scientific research institutions in Jiangsu Province have not fully utilized scientific and technological human resources and government science and technology funds, and the effective conversion rates of scientific and technological inputs and outputs have been relatively low compared to the other seven years, but, The DEA score for the technical benefits of these three years is all above 0.9. If the relevant departments can improve the combination of input elements of science and technology human resources and government science and technology funds, and strengthen the management of human resources and funds, (3) from the perspective of scale effectiveness and scale income, the scale of science and technology investment of Jiangsu Provincial Government in 1999 and 2006-2008 is effective, the scale income is unchanged, and the scale is neither large nor small. In a reasonable scale. 2000-2005 government investment in science and technology scale is invalid. In 2003, the scale return decreased, the output multiple increased less than the input multiple, and the scale was larger than the input multiple in 2000-2002 and 2004-2005. The output multiple was higher than the input multiple, and the scale was small. In view of the comprehensive effectiveness, technical effectiveness and scale effectiveness of the scientific and technological input from Jiangsu provincial government, the performance of scientific and technological input and output of Jiangsu provincial government from 2000 to 2005 is good, while in 1999 and 2006 to 2008, the comprehensive efficiency of scientific and technological input and output has been achieved. The technical efficiency and scale efficiency are both 1 and the scale income is unchanged. At present, the output performance of science and technology input of Jiangsu provincial government is constantly improving, and the output performance is excellent. This study holds that the key to promote the scientific and technological progress and the coordinated development of social economy is to grasp the correct direction of the government's scientific and technological input, and the important way to improve the efficiency of the government's scientific and technological investment is to reform the scientific and technological investment mechanism. The fundamental measure to realize the benefit of government investment in science and technology is to build a scientific and technological innovation system based on people.
【学位授予单位】：南京航空航天大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：G322.7;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谈毅,仝允桓;政府科技计划绩效评价维度、方法及模式[J];公共管理学报;2005年02期
2 王朝才;徐博;;关于自主科技创新财税政策的思考[J];经济研究参考;2007年48期
3 郭凯;;科技成果转化资金绩效管理[J];经济论坛;2006年13期
4 曲昭仲,孙泽生;地方财政科技投入模式选择分析[J];经济问题;2005年05期
5 尹奥;邵波;庞增东;;山东财政科技投入与经济增长的协整关系分析[J];科学与管理;2009年05期
6 邓向荣,刘乃辉,周密;转型期我国政府科技投入绩效研究[J];科技管理研究;2005年10期
7 单薇;肖会敏;;我国区域科技投融资模式的分析[J];科技管理研究;2006年04期
8 张毕西;欧江艳;方慧;;基于灰色关联法的地方政府财政科技投入绩效评价[J];科技管理研究;2009年08期
9 朱九田,周莹莹,杨国军;我国科研资金投入体制的演化[J];科技进步与对策;2005年03期
10 郑文范,杨建军,钱丽丽;我国科技投入从三项费用模式向公共科技财政模式转变研究[J];科技进步与对策;2005年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 曹玺;财政科技投入绩效评估研究[D];复旦大学;2008年
，本文编号：2129273
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/keyanlw/2129273.html
