家长式领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为的关系研究

发布时间：2018-04-09 08:13

本文选题：家长式领导　切入点：公务员亲组织不道德行为　出处：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：公务员是当代中国一个特殊的政治群体。陆学艺(2002)认为,公务员群体是“整个社会阶层结构中的主导性阶层,是当前社会经济发展及市场化改革的主要推动者和组织者。”在我国当前政治体制中,公务员代表行政组织行使国家公权力。加强公务员道德建设研究,规范公务员道德行为,是有效防范权力异化、维护公民利益,进而实现社会公平正义、和谐稳定的题中之义。亲组织不道德行为(unethical pro-organizational behaviors,UPB)是指个体为了所属组织和/或成员的利益而从事的有违道德甚至法律的行为。基于我国传统文化背景和行政特色,本研究探讨了家长式领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为的关系,以及在两者关系中道德推脱的中介作用和领导成员交换的调节作用,以揭示家长式领导影响公务员亲组织不道德行为的作用机制和限制条件。研究主要从以下三个方面展开:首先,修订了公务员亲组织不道德行为量表。以UmphressBingham(2010)、MatherneLitchfield(2012)的亲组织不道德量表为蓝本,参考吴明证、沈斌和孙晓玲(2016)在两者基础上修订的合并量表,通过访谈和问卷调查,最后得到包含8道题项的公务员亲组织不道德行为量表。该量表具有较好的心理计量学特征。其次,探讨了道德推脱在家长式领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为关系中的中介作用。研究发现,在家长式领导各维度中,威权领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为呈正关系,德行领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为呈负关系,而仁慈领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为相关性不显著。不仅如此,道德推脱在威权领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为关系中发挥着部分中介作用,在德行领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为关系中发挥着完全中介作用。最后,探讨了领导成员交换在家长式领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为关系中的调节作用。研究发现:领导成员交换调节着威权领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为的关系,威权领导只有在高领导成员交换条件下才能有效预测公务员亲组织不道德行为;领导成员交换调节着仁慈领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为的关系,高领导成员交换下仁慈领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为呈负相关,而低领导成员交换关系下仁慈领导与公务员亲组织不道德行为呈正相关;高质量领导成员交换能提升德行领导对公务员亲组织不道德行为的预测作用。
[Abstract]:Civil servant is a special political group in contemporary China.According to Lu Xueyi (2002), the group of civil servants is "the leading stratum in the whole social stratum structure, and the main promoter and organizer of the current social and economic development and market-oriented reform."In China's current political system, civil servants on behalf of administrative organizations exercise public power.Strengthening the research of civil servants' moral construction and standardizing civil servants' moral behavior is the meaning of effectively preventing the alienation of power, safeguarding the interests of citizens, and realizing social fairness and justice, harmony and stability.Pro-organization immoral behavior (UPBs) refers to the unethical and even legal behavior of an individual for the benefit of his or her organization and / or members.Based on the traditional cultural background and administrative characteristics of our country, this study probes into the relationship between paternalistic leadership and civil servants' immoral behavior of pro-organization, the intermediary role of moral deduction and the regulating role of the exchange of leading members in the relationship between them.In order to reveal the role of paternalistic leadership in influencing civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior and restrictions.The research is mainly carried out in the following three aspects: firstly, the civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior scale is revised.Taking Umphres Bingham-2010 / Matherne Litchfield (2012) as the original version, referring to Wu Mingzheng, Shen Bin and Sun Xiaoling (2016), the combined scale was revised on the basis of both. Finally, through interviews and questionnaires, the civil servants' pro organization immoral behavior scale containing 8 items was obtained.The scale has good psychometrics characteristics.Secondly, it discusses the intermediary role of moral deduction in the relationship between patriarchal leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior.The study found that, in each dimension of paternalistic leadership, authoritarian leadership has a positive relationship with civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior, and moral leadership has a negative relationship with civil servants' pro-organizational immoral behavior.However, there was no significant correlation between benevolent leadership and pro-organization immoral behavior of civil servants.Not only that, moral deduction plays a part of intermediary role in the relationship between authoritarian leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior, and it plays a complete intermediary role in the relationship between moral leaders and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior.Finally, the paper discusses the role of leadership exchange in the relationship between patriarchal leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior.It is found that leadership exchange regulates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior, and authoritarian leadership can effectively predict civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior only under the condition of high leadership member exchange.The exchange of leadership members regulates the relationship between benevolent leadership and civil servants' unethical behavior of pro-organization, and the relationship between merciful leadership and civil servants' pro-organizational immoral behavior is negatively correlated with that of high leaders.However, there is a positive correlation between benevolent leadership and civil servants' pro-organization immoral behavior under the exchange relationship of low leadership members, and the exchange of high-quality leadership members can enhance the predictive effect of moral leaders on civil servants' pro-organizational immoral behaviors.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：C933;D630.3

【参考文献】