抑制生产者能源回弹效应模式设计研究

发布时间：2018-03-10 04:29

本文选题：抑制能源回弹效应　切入点：能源效率收益　出处：《东北大学》2013年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：能源是人类活动的物质基础。而我国又是一个以煤炭为主要能源的国家,经济发展与环境污染的矛盾十分突出。在保证我国经济快速增长的前提下,应尽可能降低GDP增长对能源消费的依赖程度,提高能源效率、降低能源消费量是我国经济发展过程中急需解决的问题,而能源回弹效应的存在影响了国家能源政策的实施效果。近几年,我国学者对能源回弹效应的研究表明,无论是整个国民经济还是工业部门、或是钢铁行业都存在较大的能源回弹效应,因此,在提高能源效率的同时必须抑制能源回弹效应,才能真正的实现节能减耗。研究分为四个部分：第一,分析我国能源回弹效应的状况,阐述抑制能源回弹效应的必要性；第二,设计一种抑制生产者能源回弹效应的模式；第三,以工业生产者为例,对设计的抑制生产者能源回弹效应模式进行仿真；第四,提出实施抑制生产者能源回弹效应模式的政策建议。研究结果显示：2002-2010年,我国工业部门的能源效率收益具有波动性,且2010年的工业能源效率收益是2002年的近22倍；在比较不同的能源效率收益结构后发现,当消费者收益越少,国家收益越多,且不全部剥夺生产者收益的情况下,抑制回弹效应的效果就会越明显；国家收益作为技术补贴再分配于生产者,不但能保护生产者提高能源效率的积极性,还能抑制能源回弹效应,可谓一举两得。
[Abstract]:Energy is the material basis of human activities, and China is a country with coal as the main energy source. The contradiction between economic development and environmental pollution is very prominent. It is necessary to reduce the dependence of GDP growth on energy consumption, improve energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption, which is an urgent problem in the process of economic development in China. However, the existence of energy springback effect has affected the implementation effect of national energy policy. In recent years, Chinese scholars' research on energy rebound effect shows that, whether it is the whole national economy or the industrial sector, Or iron and steel industry has a large energy rebound effect, therefore, in order to achieve energy saving and consumption reduction, we must restrain the energy rebound effect while improving energy efficiency. The research is divided into four parts: first, analyze the situation of energy rebound effect in China, expound the necessity of restraining energy rebound effect; second, design a model to restrain energy rebound effect of producer; third, take industrial producer as an example. Simulation is carried out on the designed model to suppress the rebound effect of producer energy, and in 4th, some policy suggestions for restraining the rebound effect of producer energy are put forward. The results show that the industrial sector's energy efficiency benefits were volatile from 2002 to 2010, and the industrial energy efficiency gains in 2010 were nearly 22 times higher than in 2002. After comparing different energy efficiency income structures, it was found that the lower the consumer income, The more national income, and not all of which deprives the producer of income, the more obvious the effect of restraining the rebound effect will be; the redistribution of the national income to the producer as a technical subsidy not only protects the producer's enthusiasm for improving energy efficiency, Can also suppress the energy rebound effect, can be said to kill two birds with one stone.
【学位授予单位】：东北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F424.1

【参考文献】