核电工程项目管理模式选择研究

发布时间：2018-06-20 13:01

本文选题：核电工程 + 项目管理　；参考：《南华大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：在核电安全建设时期，核电安全生产，核电工程项目质量需要得到充分保证。项目管理模式众多，如何选择核电工程项目管理模式对保证核电工程项目质量有着重要意义。本文构建了核电工程项目管理模式多评价结论集结模型，，设计了核电工程项目管理模式的指标、权重以及评价。首先，分析对比DBB模式、DB模式、CM模式、PMC模式和EPC模式这几种国内外工程项目管理模式。其次，阐述了美国模式、法国模式、韩国模式、日德模式、秦山模式、岭澳模式、田湾模式、海阳模式等国内外核电工程项目管理模式。第三，建立了核电工程项目管理模式评价指标体系，在指标选取上，充分考虑了核电工程项目的特点。第四，运用层次分析法和嫡权集成设计了指标权重。最后，运用奇异值分解技术，构建了多评价结论集结模型，通过对方家山核电站项目管理模式选择，验证了模型的科学性和可行性。
[Abstract]:In the period of nuclear power safety construction, the safety of nuclear power production and the quality of nuclear power project should be fully guaranteed. There are many project management models, how to select the nuclear power project management mode is of great significance to ensure the quality of nuclear power project. In this paper, the multi-evaluation conclusion aggregation model of nuclear power project management model is constructed, and the index, weight and evaluation of nuclear power project management model are designed. Firstly, this paper analyzes and compares the DBB / DB / CM / PMC / EPC / EPC project management modes at home and abroad. Secondly, the American model, the French model, the Korean model, the Japanese-German model, the Qinshan model, the Lingao model, the Tianwan model, the Haiyang model and other nuclear power project management modes at home and abroad are expounded. Thirdly, the evaluation index system of nuclear power project management model is established, and the characteristics of nuclear power project are fully considered in the selection of indicators. Fourthly, the index weight is designed by AHP and the integration of legitimate weight. Finally, the multi-evaluation conclusion aggregation model is constructed by using singular value decomposition technology, and the scientific and feasibility of the model is verified by selecting the project management mode of the other side Jiashan Nuclear Power Station.
【学位授予单位】：南华大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F416.23;F416.61

【共引文献】