当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 生产管理论文 >

可持续发展下的煤电企业综合绩效评价研究

发布时间:2018-09-07 16:43
【摘要】:我国的能源产业结构是以煤炭为主,而煤炭的主要用途是用于发电,因此煤电企业是我国能源产业的基石,也是我国国民经济发展的基础和保障。煤电企业是一个特殊的行业,特点是高投入、高能耗、高污染,这些特点决定了煤电企业必须要走可持续发展道路。当今世界背景下,全球都在走可持续发展的道路,这为煤电企业的可持续发展提供了机遇,也带来了挑战。在可持续发展的要求下,煤电企业必须对自身的可持续发展能力、水平和前景做出科学合理客观的评价。 本文在查阅、分析、总结国内外大量关于煤电企业可持续发展、企业综合绩效评价等相关方面文献的基础上,综合考虑我国煤电企业特点和基本情况,对煤电企业的可持续发展内涵做了相关描述,并在此基础上给出了煤电企业综合绩效的内涵。本文依照可持续发展的要求对煤电企业综合绩效进行分析与研究,引入了三重绩效评价理论对可持续发展下的煤电企业综合绩效进行评价。 本论文将模糊综合评价法、层次分析法和三重绩效评价理论等相关理论基础进行了整合,构建了煤电企业综合绩效评价模型。本研究下煤电企业的综合绩效包括经济绩效、环境绩效和社会绩效三个方面,因此本文从这三个方面选择了相关评价指标,并构建了煤电企业综合绩效评价指标体系,随后运用层次分析法对构建的指标体系进行赋权。本文首先采用模糊综合评价法对经济绩效、环境绩效和社会绩效三个基本绩效以及煤电企业综合绩效进行了基本评价,在模糊综合评价法计算的三个基本绩效分值和综合绩效基本值的基础上,运用三重绩效评价模型对煤电企业的综合绩效进行进一步的评价。在模糊综合评价中,本文根据模糊隶属度函数和煤电行业各指标的评价标准,结合企业原始数据构建了模糊隶属度矩阵,在计算的权重的基础上,进一步计算出了三个基本绩效和综合绩效的模糊隶属度,并结合模糊综合评价的评分标准得出企业绩效评价基本分值。随后的三重绩效评价过程的评价内容包括煤电企业发展的静态协调度、动态协调度和三重绩效综合评价值等方面。 本论文根据构建的煤电企业综合绩效评价模型对山西兴能发电有限责任公司、山西西山热电有限责任公司、山西潞安余吾热电有限责任公司三家煤电企业进行实证研究,得出兴能公司综合绩效值位于中间,静态协调度较好,但动态协调度一般,因此三重绩效综合评价值也位于中间;西山公司的综合绩效最好,但是静态协调度和动态协调度都不高,导致三重绩效综合评价值反而不高;潞安公司的综合绩效值最低,但静态协调度最好,动态协调度最高,因此三重绩效综合评价值最高,企业潜力巨大。 根据评价结果以及煤电企业的行业发展趋势,提出煤电企业要节约利用资源,做好节能减排工作,运用可持续发展、低碳生态经济、循环经济等相关理论对企业进行技术改造,建立发展速度快、资源消耗低、环境友好型的煤电企业,从而提高煤电企业的综合绩效。
[Abstract]:China's energy industry structure is dominated by coal, and the main use of coal for power generation, so coal-fired power enterprises are the cornerstone of China's energy industry, but also the foundation and guarantee of China's national economic development.Coal-fired power enterprises are a special industry, characterized by high investment, high energy consumption, high pollution, these characteristics determine that coal-fired power enterprises must be. In today's world, the world is taking the road of sustainable development, which provides opportunities and challenges for the sustainable development of coal-fired power enterprises. Under the requirements of sustainable development, coal-fired power enterprises must make a scientific, reasonable and objective evaluation of their sustainable development capacity, level and prospects.
On the basis of consulting, analyzing and summarizing a large number of domestic and foreign literatures about the sustainable development of coal-fired power enterprises and comprehensive performance evaluation of enterprises, this paper comprehensively considers the characteristics and basic situation of coal-fired power enterprises in China, describes the connotation of sustainable development of coal-fired power enterprises, and gives the comprehensive performance of coal-fired power enterprises on this basis. According to the requirements of sustainable development, this paper analyzes and studies the comprehensive performance of coal-fired power enterprises, and introduces the triple performance evaluation theory to evaluate the comprehensive performance of coal-fired power enterprises under Sustainable development.
This paper integrates fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, analytic hierarchy process and triple performance evaluation theory, and constructs a comprehensive performance evaluation model for coal-fired power enterprises. This paper firstly uses the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the economic performance, environmental performance and social performance, and the comprehensive performance of coal and power enterprises, and then uses the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the comprehensive performance of coal and power enterprises. On the basis of the three basic performance scores and the basic comprehensive performance values calculated by the combined evaluation method, the comprehensive performance of coal and electricity enterprises is further evaluated by using the triple performance evaluation model. The fuzzy membership matrix calculates the fuzzy membership degree of three basic performance and comprehensive performance on the basis of calculating the weights, and obtains the basic score of enterprise performance evaluation according to the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation criterion. State coordination scheduling and three performance comprehensive evaluation value.
Based on the comprehensive performance evaluation model of coal and electricity enterprises, this paper makes an empirical study on three coal and electricity enterprises of Shanxi Xingneng Power Generation Co., Ltd., Shanxi Xishan Thermal Power Co., Ltd and Shanxi Luan Yuwu Thermal Power Co., Ltd. It is concluded that the comprehensive performance value of Xingneng Company lies in the middle, the static coordination degree is better, but the dynamic coordination is better. Therefore, the comprehensive evaluation value of triple performance is also in the middle; Xishan company's comprehensive performance is the best, but the static coordination degree and dynamic coordination degree are not high, resulting in the triple performance evaluation value is not high; Lu'an company's comprehensive performance value is the lowest, but the static coordination degree is the best, the dynamic coordination degree is the highest, so the triple performance synthesis. The highest value of combined assessment is the huge potential of enterprises.
According to the evaluation results and the industry development trend of coal-fired power enterprises, it is proposed that coal-fired power enterprises should economize and utilize resources, do a good job in energy conservation and emission reduction, use sustainable development, low-carbon eco-economy, recycling economy and other related theories to carry out technical transformation of enterprises, and establish coal-fired power enterprises with fast development, low resource consumption and environment-friendly characteristics. Comprehensive performance of high coal and electricity enterprises.
【学位授予单位】:山东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:F272.5;F426.61

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘传庚;;煤炭产业进入退出机制改革研究[J];山东工商学院学报;2008年06期

2 郭京福;张欣;王可;;企业社会责任评价指标研究[J];大连民族学院学报;2007年06期

3 ;能源、电力与可持续发展——中国电力发展论坛隆重召开[J];电力设备;2005年06期

4 张志强,孙成权,程国栋,牛文元;可持续发展研究:进展与趋向[J];地球科学进展;1999年06期

5 温素彬;;绩效立方体:基于可持续发展的企业绩效评价模式研究[J];管理学报;2010年03期

6 胡希;生态视角下的企业可持续发展[J];甘肃社会科学;2004年06期

7 韩春伟;;基于可持续发展的三重企业绩效矢量评价模型[J];贵州财经学院学报;2009年02期

8 王东清;吴博;;企业绩效评价模式研究综述[J];财会通讯;2012年27期

9 李永臣;何军石;;基于“三重盈余”的电网企业绩效评价模式研究[J];财会通讯;2012年26期

10 宋荆;顾平;席娜利;;企业可持续发展“三重盈余”绩效评价研究[J];华东经济管理;2006年09期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 中华人民共和国国务院总理 温家宝;[N];人民日报;2012年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 韩春伟;基于企业可持续发展的业绩评价研究[D];山东大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 栾丕志;基于可持续发展观的企业业绩评价体系研究[D];河北工程大学;2011年

2 石秀芬;我国火电企业可持续发展能力综合评价方法研究[D];华北电力大学;2011年

3 王湘志;国有企业绩效评价体系研究[D];湖南农业大学;2004年

4 李欣;我国风电企业绩效评价[D];上海师范大学;2012年

5 齐倩怡;矿产资源型企业绩效评价体系研究[D];成都理工大学;2012年



本文编号:2228828

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/shengchanguanlilunwen/2228828.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户29403***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com